Tweet
Zullo Talks: Sheriff Arpaio's Lead Obama ID Fraud Investigator Talks Obama Document Forgeries
Birther Report
6/29/2016
Excerpts:
Exclusive: Obama Birth Certificate/Selective Service Lead Investigator Speaks with The Post & Email
ARE FORGERIES CONCEALING A “HIDDEN” AGENDA?
by Sharon Rondeau
(P&E) — Four years ago, Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Maricopa County Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo disseminated the results of a criminal investigation of the long-form birth certificate image posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II.”
The investigators determined that the image could not have originated with a real, paper document and that it was posted “with the intent to deceive,” the details of which were released in two press conferences.
At the first presser on March 1, 2012, Zullo and Arpaio stated that there was “probable cause” to believe that the birth certificate image is fraudulent. At the second, on July 17 of that year, they declared that the probable cause standard had been overcome based on new information gleaned from the ongoing investigation.
Also included in the criminal probe was an analysis of Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form, which Zullo told The Post & Email “was found not to be a ‘computer-generated forgery’ like the Birth Certificate pdf file, but believed to be an actual hard-copy, paper-created document created at a much later date in time.” Those conclusions were based, in part, on the two-digit year stamp, which differed from the four-digit year stamps of 17 other Selective Service registration forms obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Linda Bentley of The Sonoran News.
.................................................. ...........................
On Monday, Zullo told The Post & Email:
The Post & Email asked, “Is there any way to know if Obama ever registered for Selective Service, perhaps under a different name?”
[ The Post & Email ] - http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/06/...he-post-email/
View the complete Birther Report presentation, including links and comments, at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/06...ead-obama.html
Birther Report
6/29/2016
Excerpts:
Exclusive: Obama Birth Certificate/Selective Service Lead Investigator Speaks with The Post & Email
ARE FORGERIES CONCEALING A “HIDDEN” AGENDA?
by Sharon Rondeau
(P&E) — Four years ago, Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and Maricopa County Cold Case Posse lead investigator Mike Zullo disseminated the results of a criminal investigation of the long-form birth certificate image posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II.”
The investigators determined that the image could not have originated with a real, paper document and that it was posted “with the intent to deceive,” the details of which were released in two press conferences.
At the first presser on March 1, 2012, Zullo and Arpaio stated that there was “probable cause” to believe that the birth certificate image is fraudulent. At the second, on July 17 of that year, they declared that the probable cause standard had been overcome based on new information gleaned from the ongoing investigation.
Also included in the criminal probe was an analysis of Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form, which Zullo told The Post & Email “was found not to be a ‘computer-generated forgery’ like the Birth Certificate pdf file, but believed to be an actual hard-copy, paper-created document created at a much later date in time.” Those conclusions were based, in part, on the two-digit year stamp, which differed from the four-digit year stamps of 17 other Selective Service registration forms obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Linda Bentley of The Sonoran News.
.................................................. ...........................
On Monday, Zullo told The Post & Email:
During our press conference, we spoke about the Selective Service issue ....
After we replicated what we believed actually transpired to create the appearance of an authentic stamp, with in three or four days later, the Selective Service changed its policy. Selective Service stonewalled our investigation by issuing a new policy whereby they would cooperate only with federal investigations. We weren’t allowed to proceed with them, we would not be permitted to view the actual hard-copy document or the microfilm record of the “original” if it had in fact been preserved. To us this new position by Selective Service was rather telling.
Moving forward to today, this new option in the oath of allegiance by this administration is obviously Obama’s position on the matter. It’s jarring and it’s unnerving, because we have an individual who we don’t think ever registered for Selective Service sitting in the White House who is obviously OK with foreigners coming to the USA, being naturalized but never having to take an oath to defend this country. What does that really mean about their Selective Service status? What happens in the future? In a draft situation do they become conscientious objectors? Do they become someone who’s exempt from fighting on behalf of this country from some untested legal position because pledging to defend the country was an opt-out option for them? Do they get a pass?
If you go back and think about Obama’s position on the “DREAMERS” and now his position on those who want to become full citizens, he is saying, “You don’t have to take an oath to defend this nation.” His idea of a foreigner coming in here isn’t to have them assimilate to the culture; for him, someone who’s a foreigner can come over here and try to change this country but does not have to risk his or her life to defend it. Obviously that’s how he thinks. This is an unconscionable position for the Commander-in-Chief of the greatest military known to man to take.
Looking back to the Selective Service form, it really raises the suspicion even higher as to whether he actually registered and if he himself would take an oath to defend this country. He took an oath to defend the Constitution, the very document that he calls “pesky.” Looking back at his actions of the last seven plus years, you have to look at this and say, “This is starting to look like ‘birds of a feather.’ Birds of a feather on immigration, birds of a feather with loyalty to the United States of America…you have to step back and take a hard look at this.
I don’t believe that that Selective Service document is authentic on any level, and I think the federal government stonewalled us from pursuing it, because inspection of that document would have been problematic for them. Because they wouldn’t cooperate, it stopped us cold.
Here’s the ploy they’re using: This goes in tandem with the stonewalling of the birth certificate investigation, because what they’re saying is, “Turn your stuff over to the FBI, because we’ll make sure the FBI never looks into it.” That’s what people need to realize. This whole thing has been stonewalled because of the chess pieces that are in place around this administration and what they control. It is no different than Hillary Clinton’s email scandal: if Obama wanted it shut down, they could just shut it down.
The picture painted here is one of obfuscation and outright deceit, and that goes right to that birth document that I maintain was not created in 1961.
After we replicated what we believed actually transpired to create the appearance of an authentic stamp, with in three or four days later, the Selective Service changed its policy. Selective Service stonewalled our investigation by issuing a new policy whereby they would cooperate only with federal investigations. We weren’t allowed to proceed with them, we would not be permitted to view the actual hard-copy document or the microfilm record of the “original” if it had in fact been preserved. To us this new position by Selective Service was rather telling.
Moving forward to today, this new option in the oath of allegiance by this administration is obviously Obama’s position on the matter. It’s jarring and it’s unnerving, because we have an individual who we don’t think ever registered for Selective Service sitting in the White House who is obviously OK with foreigners coming to the USA, being naturalized but never having to take an oath to defend this country. What does that really mean about their Selective Service status? What happens in the future? In a draft situation do they become conscientious objectors? Do they become someone who’s exempt from fighting on behalf of this country from some untested legal position because pledging to defend the country was an opt-out option for them? Do they get a pass?
If you go back and think about Obama’s position on the “DREAMERS” and now his position on those who want to become full citizens, he is saying, “You don’t have to take an oath to defend this nation.” His idea of a foreigner coming in here isn’t to have them assimilate to the culture; for him, someone who’s a foreigner can come over here and try to change this country but does not have to risk his or her life to defend it. Obviously that’s how he thinks. This is an unconscionable position for the Commander-in-Chief of the greatest military known to man to take.
Looking back to the Selective Service form, it really raises the suspicion even higher as to whether he actually registered and if he himself would take an oath to defend this country. He took an oath to defend the Constitution, the very document that he calls “pesky.” Looking back at his actions of the last seven plus years, you have to look at this and say, “This is starting to look like ‘birds of a feather.’ Birds of a feather on immigration, birds of a feather with loyalty to the United States of America…you have to step back and take a hard look at this.
I don’t believe that that Selective Service document is authentic on any level, and I think the federal government stonewalled us from pursuing it, because inspection of that document would have been problematic for them. Because they wouldn’t cooperate, it stopped us cold.
Here’s the ploy they’re using: This goes in tandem with the stonewalling of the birth certificate investigation, because what they’re saying is, “Turn your stuff over to the FBI, because we’ll make sure the FBI never looks into it.” That’s what people need to realize. This whole thing has been stonewalled because of the chess pieces that are in place around this administration and what they control. It is no different than Hillary Clinton’s email scandal: if Obama wanted it shut down, they could just shut it down.
The picture painted here is one of obfuscation and outright deceit, and that goes right to that birth document that I maintain was not created in 1961.
The Post & Email asked, “Is there any way to know if Obama ever registered for Selective Service, perhaps under a different name?”
There’s no way to verify that. What we know is that stamp is suspect. It obviously matches no other stamp in existence that we know of to date. We also had retired postmasters general look at that document, and it raised their eyebrows. We have people who have dealt with those stamps for 40 years and said, ‘There is something way wrong here.’
Even from a mechanical standpoint, the stamp does not and cannot be operated in such a manner to cause the effect as displayed on his Selective Service card. You wouldn’t be able to rock that stamp to get that effect. And the inverted “8″…we showed you how that happened in the video.
We ran into the stonewall in the state of Hawaii, where they hid behind their state statute, stopping us from going in and getting an eyeball, hands-on look at the birth certificate and have the actual witness, Dr. Onaka, who purportedly stamped it, vouch for it. We were not permitted access to Onaka; even though he was in the building and knew who we were and why we were there, he refused to speak with us.
Then the Selective Service form comes out, and they have a problem. They don’t have a statute to stand behind. So what do they do? They changed their policy to make it difficult for us. They knew exactly what they were doing when they so abruptly changed their policy. If we pursued the matter it would have ended up in court and we would have had to prove “standing” and jurisdiction. We would have had to have gotten a judge to order them cooperate, and they knew we would not be successful there. So that’s how they stonewalled that. Everything pertinent to this narrative is stonewalled on some governmental level.
The actions of Selective Service only bolster the argument that Obama never registered because he himself doesn’t think that this is a necessity or he did not have to for other legal reasons.
Think what his lifting of this requirement to defend the country means in this context: You are born here in the USA. You have an automatic allegiance to your nation; no oath is required. It is expected of you to serve in the defense of this nation if called upon to do so. It is a birthright and privilege and your obligation as a United States citizen. You should be willing to defend your nation as you would defend your own family
So what he’s saying is that if you are born here you have no choice but to risk your life in service to your country, but if you immigrate here, as a naturalized citizen you have a special privilege: you can have allegiance to the United States up until the point that the United States becomes embattled, and then you’re under no obligation to uphold your allegiance to this country to defend it. That appears to me to be a distinct separation of a class of people. Natural born Citizens have to fight, whereas foreign-born citizens don’t.
Here’s the next legal battle that will come: In a draft situation, are we now going to have to have a legal fight going to the Supreme Court based on the position “I did not take an oath of allegiance to defend the nation so therefore I am exempt from being drafted because I was an immigrant? When I became a citizen, I made no such agreement as a condition upon receiving my citizenship so I don’t have to defend this country. I don’t have to serve in its military; I’m exempt.” Oaths are important and oaths are binding.
If you really look at it, this is an anti-American, anti-American-culture agenda.
What he wants to do is change the culture. To do that, he has to bring people in who aren’t of the culture. He can’t change it at the ballot box, so he has to do it this way.
Even from a mechanical standpoint, the stamp does not and cannot be operated in such a manner to cause the effect as displayed on his Selective Service card. You wouldn’t be able to rock that stamp to get that effect. And the inverted “8″…we showed you how that happened in the video.
We ran into the stonewall in the state of Hawaii, where they hid behind their state statute, stopping us from going in and getting an eyeball, hands-on look at the birth certificate and have the actual witness, Dr. Onaka, who purportedly stamped it, vouch for it. We were not permitted access to Onaka; even though he was in the building and knew who we were and why we were there, he refused to speak with us.
Then the Selective Service form comes out, and they have a problem. They don’t have a statute to stand behind. So what do they do? They changed their policy to make it difficult for us. They knew exactly what they were doing when they so abruptly changed their policy. If we pursued the matter it would have ended up in court and we would have had to prove “standing” and jurisdiction. We would have had to have gotten a judge to order them cooperate, and they knew we would not be successful there. So that’s how they stonewalled that. Everything pertinent to this narrative is stonewalled on some governmental level.
The actions of Selective Service only bolster the argument that Obama never registered because he himself doesn’t think that this is a necessity or he did not have to for other legal reasons.
Think what his lifting of this requirement to defend the country means in this context: You are born here in the USA. You have an automatic allegiance to your nation; no oath is required. It is expected of you to serve in the defense of this nation if called upon to do so. It is a birthright and privilege and your obligation as a United States citizen. You should be willing to defend your nation as you would defend your own family
So what he’s saying is that if you are born here you have no choice but to risk your life in service to your country, but if you immigrate here, as a naturalized citizen you have a special privilege: you can have allegiance to the United States up until the point that the United States becomes embattled, and then you’re under no obligation to uphold your allegiance to this country to defend it. That appears to me to be a distinct separation of a class of people. Natural born Citizens have to fight, whereas foreign-born citizens don’t.
Here’s the next legal battle that will come: In a draft situation, are we now going to have to have a legal fight going to the Supreme Court based on the position “I did not take an oath of allegiance to defend the nation so therefore I am exempt from being drafted because I was an immigrant? When I became a citizen, I made no such agreement as a condition upon receiving my citizenship so I don’t have to defend this country. I don’t have to serve in its military; I’m exempt.” Oaths are important and oaths are binding.
If you really look at it, this is an anti-American, anti-American-culture agenda.
What he wants to do is change the culture. To do that, he has to bring people in who aren’t of the culture. He can’t change it at the ballot box, so he has to do it this way.
[ The Post & Email ] - http://www.thepostemail.com/2016/06/...he-post-email/
View the complete Birther Report presentation, including links and comments, at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2016/06...ead-obama.html