Tweet
Editorial: Obama's power grab flouts Constitution
Blatant disregard of laws passed by Congress violates separation of powers
The Detroit News
8/6/2012
Excerpt:
"Democrats and Republicans alike should be distressed by President Barack Obama's disregard for constitutional limits on his authority. The president's flouting of the separation of powers risks turning this country into something other than a representative democracy. Congress should move in a bipartisan rebuke of Obama's overreach before he neuters that institution.
In a blatant challenge to the legislative branch, Obama by executive order tossed out the Clinton-era welfare reform that required able-bodied aid recipients to work, saying the federal government will no longer enforce the law.
This follows the president's unilateral rewrite of immigration law, using an executive order to implement elements of the DREAM Act, which Congress refused to adopt. He also has thumbed his nose at the No Child Left Behind Act, and has put in place cap-and-trade carbon rules that were specifically rejected by Congress.
He can't do these things, by any reading of the Constitution. And yet he is. Because Congress, whose powers he is usurping, hasn't risen to stop him.
The Constitution separates powers between the legislative, administrative and judicial branches to more effectively limit government authority, and thus protect individual liberty.
Obama apparently does not recognize those constitutional limits on his power.
He is doing these things under the rallying cry of "We Can't Wait," contending that the gridlock in Congress caused by Republican gamesmanship is impeding his agenda.
But this is how the founders intended government to work. The responsibility is on the president to forge a working relationship with Congress. Obama's inability to do that does not give him the power to act unilaterally, even if it were true that the opposition wants to see him fail.
The imperial presidency Obama is building should worry Democrats as much as it does Republicans. This has never been an "end justifies the means" nation. Even if you agree with the outcomes the president is seeking, his running roughshod over the rule of law should be objectionable, because the powers he is claiming will not be forfeited by the next Republican president.
Democrats and civil libertarians rightly protested when former President George W. Bush used the war on terror to grab authority from Congress and the courts, particularly in regard to wire-tapping and detentions. We shared their concern then, and are even more chagrined now because Obama's power grab comes in the domestic arena, where presidential authority is more tightly constrained than it is in dealing with national security.
The founders were justifiably worried about an aggressive president using the office to claim dictatorial control of the nation. That's why they so carefully limited and separated the powers."
..................................
View the complete article at:
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2...s-Constitution
Blatant disregard of laws passed by Congress violates separation of powers
The Detroit News
8/6/2012
Excerpt:
"Democrats and Republicans alike should be distressed by President Barack Obama's disregard for constitutional limits on his authority. The president's flouting of the separation of powers risks turning this country into something other than a representative democracy. Congress should move in a bipartisan rebuke of Obama's overreach before he neuters that institution.
In a blatant challenge to the legislative branch, Obama by executive order tossed out the Clinton-era welfare reform that required able-bodied aid recipients to work, saying the federal government will no longer enforce the law.
This follows the president's unilateral rewrite of immigration law, using an executive order to implement elements of the DREAM Act, which Congress refused to adopt. He also has thumbed his nose at the No Child Left Behind Act, and has put in place cap-and-trade carbon rules that were specifically rejected by Congress.
He can't do these things, by any reading of the Constitution. And yet he is. Because Congress, whose powers he is usurping, hasn't risen to stop him.
The Constitution separates powers between the legislative, administrative and judicial branches to more effectively limit government authority, and thus protect individual liberty.
Obama apparently does not recognize those constitutional limits on his power.
He is doing these things under the rallying cry of "We Can't Wait," contending that the gridlock in Congress caused by Republican gamesmanship is impeding his agenda.
But this is how the founders intended government to work. The responsibility is on the president to forge a working relationship with Congress. Obama's inability to do that does not give him the power to act unilaterally, even if it were true that the opposition wants to see him fail.
The imperial presidency Obama is building should worry Democrats as much as it does Republicans. This has never been an "end justifies the means" nation. Even if you agree with the outcomes the president is seeking, his running roughshod over the rule of law should be objectionable, because the powers he is claiming will not be forfeited by the next Republican president.
Democrats and civil libertarians rightly protested when former President George W. Bush used the war on terror to grab authority from Congress and the courts, particularly in regard to wire-tapping and detentions. We shared their concern then, and are even more chagrined now because Obama's power grab comes in the domestic arena, where presidential authority is more tightly constrained than it is in dealing with national security.
The founders were justifiably worried about an aggressive president using the office to claim dictatorial control of the nation. That's why they so carefully limited and separated the powers."
..................................
View the complete article at:
http://www.detroitnews.com/article/2...s-Constitution