Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Did Obama win the November 6, 2012 U.S. presidential election through fraud?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Did Obama win the November 6, 2012 U.S. presidential election through fraud?

    Did Obama win the November 6, 2012 U.S. presidential election through fraud?

    The following is a pertinent excerpt from COMMENT #104, by 'butterdezillion' in an 11/8/2012 Free Republic Thread



    I’m not looking to blame anything. All I want is the truth. The truth is it would be very easy to flip votes via software. And it would be really easy to sign a voter list and start punching in votes en masse when the R observers were kicked out in each of the battleground states. In some Philadelphia precincts Obama got 99% of the vote - even higher than the percentage of Obama votes by Blacks overall, I believe. Those are banana republic numbers, not the numbers in an election with integrity.

    Winning through fraud would not take much at all.

    But we’ve seen even worse coordination that can be documented, and you are a fool if you believe that big conspiracies are impossible. Good Lord - look at some of the footage from the German concentration camps.

    Let me tell you something. After I pointed out on my blog that the HI state registrar had confirmed that Obama’s HI BC is legally non-valid, and noted that the KS dem party chair (who was quoted in an article claiming the issue was settled) had been informed of that fact, that I had proof she was informed of that fact, and that she better watch what she says.... I had somebody try to post on my blog, saying that he/she had helped create the birth certificate forgery that Onaka had just confirmed as a forgery. He/she specifically admitted to committing a felony but said my resistance is futile because Obama has immunity and so do the creators of the forgery - and that the FBI knows they did it and will cover for them and laugh in the face of anybody who reports it. This person didn’t have to tell me that; I already had an FBI person lie to me about the FBI not investigating document fraud (right before I went online to report the fraud and was told that my complaint would be routed to the FBI...)

    Here’s the kicker. This poster used a gateway to hide where they were posting from, and put in tripwires to fry the computer of anybody (including my colleague whose computer was fried) who got anywhere close to finding out where they were really from. The e-mail address used was one that is used by multiple other people as well. Sort of a lot to go through if a person is “just kidding”, wouldn’t you say?

    Bill Gwatney and Stephanie Tubbs are dead - killed in succession as they each in turn agreed to present a petition at the 2008 Convention challenging Obama’s eligibility. We have signed statements from at least one media personality saying that their news company told them they had been threatened by Obama’s goons and if the on-air personalities reported on the eligibility issue their career would be over and their lives and families’ lives were questionable. Those threats have been verified by law enforcement.

    I have proven on my blog that the 1960-64 birth index at the Hawaii DOH has been altered to include the names from legally non-valid records. AP reporter Mark Niesse had admitted in an article, shortly before Obama’s long-form forgery was posted, that the name in that index is the only evidence presented by the HDOH regarding Obama’s records. And I have proven that the HDOH manipulated that evidence so that it doesn’t prove what everybody tries claiming that it proved.

    I could go on all day, giving examples of crimes and corruption that have carried the day on Obama’s eligibility.

    Obama’s passport was breached 3 times, and sources close to the investigation say it was to sanitize his record.

    Obama’s selective service registration has been proven as a forgery - most likely done by somebody within that agency, and being hidden by that agency.

    Alex Galovich of the Passport Office submitted in court a forged DOS cable claiming that millions of passport applications were destroyed because the retention period was changed - but there is no record of the destruction as required by law, there is no record of the retention period being changed as required by law, there is no record of it being changed BACK as required by law, and the records that were supposedly destroyed have been disclosed to requestors all during the nearly 30 years since they were supposedly destroyed.

    The amount of crimes committed over this issue would blow your mind away. And it’s all documented.

    ...............................................

    View the complete Free Republic post at:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bl...s?page=104#104
    Last edited by bsteadman; 11-08-2012, 05:38 PM.
    B. Steadman
Working...
X