Supreme Court rules on Obama forgery case; birthers protest decision (Photos)
Examiner
Marv Dumon, Republican Examiner
2/16/2013
Excerpt:
On Tuesday, Feb. 19, the Supreme Court of the United States will announce its decision on whether or not Barack Obama should have been placed on the California ballot during the 2008 presidential elections.
On Friday, the nation's highest court released a list of granted petitions which indicates that it has rejected arguments that Obama used forged IDs in order to to run for political office, actions that are considered a felony.
On Feb. 15, the Supreme Court announced four cases that have been granted oral argument by the solicitor general, and therefore, further review by the justices. None of these included Noonan v. Bowen, a California-based lawsuit arguing that Obama should have been replaced by other Democratic presidential candidates nearly five years ago.
On Tuesday, the high court will issue a lengthy list of cases that have been rejected for additional review, a list that will most likely include Noonan v. Bowen. Though the Supreme Court has the option to add certain cases that have been elevated to oral arguments, only one percent of cases submitted to Scotus reach that level.
On the court's website, it identifies the status of Docket 12A606:
Noonan's supplemental brief claims that Obama is "[a] citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency."
Noonan et al provides other arguments:
Additional evidence includes an affidavit by debt collector Albert Hendershot. When conducting a background check on Obama's social security number (042-xx-xxxx), it listed Harrison J. Bounel as a holder of the same SSN. The Social Security Administration does not recycle social security numbers, and officials consider duplicate usage as a red flag for identity fraud.
...........................................
View the complete article at:
http://www.examiner.com/article/supr...otest-decision
Examiner
Marv Dumon, Republican Examiner
2/16/2013
Excerpt:
On Tuesday, Feb. 19, the Supreme Court of the United States will announce its decision on whether or not Barack Obama should have been placed on the California ballot during the 2008 presidential elections.
On Friday, the nation's highest court released a list of granted petitions which indicates that it has rejected arguments that Obama used forged IDs in order to to run for political office, actions that are considered a felony.
On Feb. 15, the Supreme Court announced four cases that have been granted oral argument by the solicitor general, and therefore, further review by the justices. None of these included Noonan v. Bowen, a California-based lawsuit arguing that Obama should have been replaced by other Democratic presidential candidates nearly five years ago.
On Tuesday, the high court will issue a lengthy list of cases that have been rejected for additional review, a list that will most likely include Noonan v. Bowen. Though the Supreme Court has the option to add certain cases that have been elevated to oral arguments, only one percent of cases submitted to Scotus reach that level.
On the court's website, it identifies the status of Docket 12A606:
- Title: Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants v. Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State
- Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
- Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
- Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Noonan's supplemental brief claims that Obama is "[a] citizen of Indonesia, as listed in his school registration #203 from Franciscan Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia. As a citizen of Indonesia Obama was never eligible and never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency."
Noonan et al provides other arguments:
- "Obama is using last name not legally his. Plaintiffs provided this court with the passport records of Stanley Ann Dunham, deceased mother of Barack Obama, showing that he is listed under the last name Soebarkah in her passport. He was removed from her passport in August of 1969 pursuant to the request and sworn statement of Ms. Dunham and signed by the U.S. consul in Jakarta Indonesia."
- "Obama's 2009 tax returns posted by Obama himself [online] showed him using a CT Social Security number 042-xx-xxxx, which failed both E-verify and SSNVS."
Additional evidence includes an affidavit by debt collector Albert Hendershot. When conducting a background check on Obama's social security number (042-xx-xxxx), it listed Harrison J. Bounel as a holder of the same SSN. The Social Security Administration does not recycle social security numbers, and officials consider duplicate usage as a red flag for identity fraud.
...........................................
View the complete article at:
http://www.examiner.com/article/supr...otest-decision