Tweet
Who (or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision, and to turn you (Congress, Judiciary, Military, Media) into a TREASONOUS CO-CONSPIRATOR?
Before It's News
Neil B. Turner
4/6/2013
Excerpt:
Citizens for the Constitution;
‘Who (or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision … and to turn otherwise intelligent people into blithering idiots?’
In Part 1 of this series on the FUQ (Frequently Unasked Questions) titled ‘Rhetorical Questions? We don’t need no more stinkin’ rhetorical questions!’, we discussed why all the rhetorical questions of ‘why would Obama and his administration commit all its anti-American acts’ were meaningless and obfuscatory.
In Part II of this series on the FUQ (Frequently Unasked Questions) titled ‘The best DEFENSE is a good OFFENSE!’,we discussed some ideas on FUQs to ask those who would support and defend ‘the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people’ (© 2012 Clint Eastwood).
Here in Part III, we define and refine the FUQ (Frequently Unasked Questions), to include a direct question for those in Congress, the Judiciary, the Military, and the Media:
First, the term INELIGIBILITY (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5) is obviously understoodby Congress to mean what Congress and Obama said it meant in S.Res.-511, when they declared that John McCain was a ‘natural born Citizen because he was born of two U.S. Citizen parents–
– when Obama had already acknowledged, by his forged short-form (and later his forged long-form) Certificate of Birth, that he was not born to American citizens, and;
Second, the term acts of TREASON is obvious to all when the person unlawfully occupying the Office of President has obtained that Office by fraud, forgery, deception and deceit:
..........................................
View the complete article at:
http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-a...r-2451580.html
Before It's News
Neil B. Turner
4/6/2013
Excerpt:
Citizens for the Constitution;
‘Who (or what) has the power to make the issue of Obama’s INELIGIBILITY and acts of TREASON not fit for discussion, only derision … and to turn otherwise intelligent people into blithering idiots?’
In Part 1 of this series on the FUQ (Frequently Unasked Questions) titled ‘Rhetorical Questions? We don’t need no more stinkin’ rhetorical questions!’, we discussed why all the rhetorical questions of ‘why would Obama and his administration commit all its anti-American acts’ were meaningless and obfuscatory.
In Part II of this series on the FUQ (Frequently Unasked Questions) titled ‘The best DEFENSE is a good OFFENSE!’,we discussed some ideas on FUQs to ask those who would support and defend ‘the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people’ (© 2012 Clint Eastwood).
Here in Part III, we define and refine the FUQ (Frequently Unasked Questions), to include a direct question for those in Congress, the Judiciary, the Military, and the Media:
First, the term INELIGIBILITY (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5) is obviously understoodby Congress to mean what Congress and Obama said it meant in S.Res.-511, when they declared that John McCain was a ‘natural born Citizen because he was born of two U.S. Citizen parents–
Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it:
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a `natural born Citizen' under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.
– when Obama had already acknowledged, by his forged short-form (and later his forged long-form) Certificate of Birth, that he was not born to American citizens, and;
Second, the term acts of TREASON is obvious to all when the person unlawfully occupying the Office of President has obtained that Office by fraud, forgery, deception and deceit:
..........................................
View the complete article at:
http://beforeitsnews.com/economics-a...r-2451580.html