Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Sibley Update: Motion Set For U.S. Supreme Court Conference Oct. 11 -- Birther Report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Sibley Update: Motion Set For U.S. Supreme Court Conference Oct. 11 -- Birther Report

    Sibley Update: Motion Set For U.S. Supreme Court Conference Oct. 11

    Birther Report

    10/2/2013

    Excerpt:

    Obama Dismisses Indictment Against Fugitive Bombing Terrorist - Part V

    Update: The Clerk of the United States Supreme Court has set for Conference my Motion to Direct the Clerk to File my Petition for Certiorari and Motion to Expedite on Friday, October 11, 2013. During the Conference, the Nine Justices will decide whether to grant or deny my Motion. Typically, the Clerk releases the results of the Friday Conferences the following Tuesday. - Montgomery Blair Sibley. Previous reports here.

    Questions Presented For Review ( Petition for Writ of Certiorari )

    On May 11, 1988, Defendant Elizabeth Duke was indicted for acts of violence against the United States, including the bombing of the United States Capitol on November 7, 1983. When she failed to appear for her arraignment on June 2, 1988, a bench warrant was issued for Defendant Elizabeth Duke.

    Twenty-one years later, on June 17, 2009, the government made an oral motion to dismiss the Indictment and quash the arrest warrant against the still-fugitive Defendant Elizabeth Duke without stating any reasons for the motion. Magistrate Judge Deborah A. Robinson granted the oral motion to dismiss and quash the same day falsely stating in her order that the dismissal was: “for the reasons set forth in the government’s motion and for good cause shown” when in fact there were no “reasons set forth” nor “good cause” shown.

    Accordingly, presented for review are the following questions: [...] Petition continued here.

    Excerpt: Petitioner’s Motions to Expedite Consideration of Petition for a Writ of Certiorari, Leave to File Ex Parte and Under Seal and to Set Expedited Schedule for Briefing and Oral Argument;

    Petitioner, Montgomery Blair Sibley (“Sibley”), respectfully requests that this Court: (i) expedite its consideration of the petition for a writ of certiorari in this case, (ii) permit Sibley to file ex parte and under seal information in support of this Motion to Expedite and (iii) pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25.5 expedite the schedule for briefing and oral argument.
    I. BACKGROUND

    As more fully detailed in the accompanying Petition:
    • On November 7, 1983, in the District of Columbia, a bomb was detonated inside the United States Capitol.
    • On May 24, 1985, Defendant Elizabeth Duke (“Duke”) was arraigned upon an Indictment charging her with involvement in the aforementioned bombing.
    • On July 24, 1985, Duke was released on bail. After failing to appear back in Court as ordered, on October 15, 1985, Duke’s bail was revoked and a bench warrant for her arrest as a fugitive was issued the same day.
    • On May 11, 1988, Duke – along with her co-conspirators Laura Whitehorn, Linda Evans, Marilyn Buck, Susan Rosenberg, Timothy Blunk, and Alan Berkman1 – was


    The Black Liberation Army and May 19th Communist Movement had organized the October 20, 1981, Brinks robbery in Nanuet, New York, in which $1.6 million was taken from a Brink's armored car. In a shootout shortly after the heist, two police officers were killed. A witness told a grand jury that Berkman had treated one of the holdup group's members for a gunshot wound. Indicted as an accessory after the fact, Berkman jumped bail and went underground. On the run, Berkman and Elizabeth Ann Duke were arrested on May 23, 1985, near Doylestown, Pennsylvania. Their car was found to have a pistol and shotgun, as well as the key to a storage site that held 100 pounds of dynamite. During his years on the run in the 1980s, court papers alleged, he was involved with groups that had staged seven bombings of military and other government facilities, though charges related to the bombings were later dismissed. Berkman was convicted for his participation in the supermarket robbery, the proceeds of which, prosecutors alleged, had been used to buy the dynamite. Berkman served eight years of a 10-year sentence.

    ........................................

    View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

    http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/10...s-supreme.html
    B. Steadman
Working...
X