Federal Prosecutor: Obama Guilty Of Serial Fraud; Impeachment & Removal

[bsteadman]

Federal Prosecutor: Obama Guilty Of Serial Fraud; Impeachment & Removal

Birther Report
11/14/2013

Excerpt:

Former Federal Prosecutor: Obama Guilty Of Serial Fraud; Impeachment And Removal...

A few days ago former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy penned a blistering piece at National Review Online accusing Obama of massive fraud for repeatedly lying about Obamacare. Last night McCarthy appeared on Fox News' The Kelly Files to take his argument to the masses:

VIDEO ...:
( Video via Fox News @ Gateway Pundit. )

McCarthy wrote at National Review Online:

The Justice Department is notoriously aggressive when it comes to material omissions by public corporations. Any public statement — not just in a required SEC filing but in any public context — may be deemed actionable if its purpose is to deceive the general public about a company’s condition. For example, as I’ve noted before, the Justice Department indicted Martha Stewart for fraud over press statements that did not disclose damaging information about her company.

Ms. Stewart, naturally, was fearful that truthful statements would send the stock price plummeting. Obama, by comparison, was not lying merely to prevent a company from losing value. His fraud was, first, to induce passage of a plan designed gradually to destroy the private health-insurance market — a plan that barely passed and never would have been enacted if he’d been honest. And later, his fraud was to procure his reelection and the guaranteed implementation of Obamacare; had he been honest, he would have been defeated and Obamacare forestalled.

Barack Obama is guilty of fraud — serial fraud — that is orders of magnitude more serious than frauds the Justice Department routinely prosecutes, and that courts punish harshly. The victims will be out billions of dollars, quite apart from other anxiety and disruption that will befall them.

The president will not be prosecuted, of course, but that is immaterial. As discussed here before, the remedy for profound presidential corruption is political, not legal. It is impeachment and removal. “High crimes and misdemeanors” — the Constitution’s predicate for impeachment — need not be indictable offenses under the criminal code. “They relate chiefly,” Hamilton explained in Federalist No. 65, “to injuries done immediately to the society itself.” They involve scandalous breaches of the public trust by officials in whom solemn fiduciary duties are reposed — like a president who looks Americans in the eye and declares, repeatedly, that they can keep their health insurance plans . . . even as he studiously orchestrates the regulatory termination of those plans; even as he shifts blame to the insurance companies for his malfeasance — just as he shifted blame to a hapless video producer for his shocking dereliction of duty during the Benghazi massacre. [...]

- Continued @ National Review Online.

View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/11...ial-fraud.html

[bsteadman]

Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Former Federal Prosecutor: Obama is guilty of SERIAL FRAUD', which was started 11/14/2013 by 'Whenifhow'

The thread references a 11/13/2013 article on 'The Right Scoop' - http://therightscoop.com/former-fede...-serial-fraud/

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3091106/posts

Excerpt:

Former Federal Prosecutor Andy McCarthy says that Obama is guilty of serial fraud against the American people. He cites several promises Obama made regarding Obamacare and said if an actual insurance CEO made these promises, they’d be prosecuted in a heartbeat.

But he says there’s no point in talking about impeachment until there is a political will in this country to make it happen.

Watch:

---

To: Patriot Babe; All

Article that Andy McCarthy wrote
Obama’s Massive Fraud
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...rew-c-mccarthy

7 posted on Thursday, November 14, 2013 12:26:54 AM by Whenifhow

---

To: jsanders2001

I think it goes deeper than color. I think Obama has been untouchable because Soros and his communist-Islamist alliance have threatened to make another run on the bank and collapse the world economy. September of 2008 was just a display of their ability to do it, and once they proved they could do it, they threatened whoever couldn’t be bribed. We know that in Oct of 2008 Soros and his stooges Axelrod and Emanuel threatened the media company heads with anti-monopoly annihilation if anyone in their company allowed reporting or commentary on Obama’s eligibility issue or Muslim leanings. They told their on-air personalities that their careers would be over if they allowed those subjects to air, and their lives and their loved ones’ lives were in question.

One of those personalities signed a statement explaining what had happened and gave it to PI Doug Hagmann, who investigated and corroborated the story with multiple eyewitnesses, handwritten notes, etc. Hagmann came out with the story in 2009 but quieted down on the issue shortly thereafter. A well-placed source has said he did that because one of his sources was killed and he wanted to protect another source who was especially vulnerable. I reported this stuff to Mike Zullo of Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse and he followed up by confirming that the threats did happen and that the source Hagmann was worried about had since fled the country with her family, in fear for their lives. Eventually Hagmann agreed to let another reporter look at his evidence and report non-confidential information, and he reported that Glenn Beck left Fox after the Van Jones take-down because his secretary was getting daily threats and intimidation and Fox refused to provide a bodyguard for her.

Since then we’ve had the sudden, basically uninvestigated death of Breitbart and what was considered a bomb threat to Rush Limbaugh - both on the same day as Arpaio’s team announced probable cause and an ensuing criminal investigation of forgery and fraud involving Obama’s BC and selective service registration. The Breitbart coroner may have been influenced to not officially look for a small red entry hole for a potassium chloride assassination dart because Michael Cormier, a tech at his office, was blatantly poisoned with arsenic a few days before the autopsy release and his doctors basically refused to treat him (let him go without testing in spite of classic arsenic symptoms and Cormier saying he believed he had been poisoned - supposedly letting him go untreated because they thought he “only” had perforated bowel, which is fatal if untreated...) When Cormier’s death was noted as a possible means to intimidate the coroner into sanitizing the Breitbart autopsy, the LAPD stepped in to lie about what happened with Cormier and cover up any possible connection, while at the same time refusing to investigate Cormier’s death even though it would have been a cinch to find his killer because the symptoms appear so suddenly a half hour after exposure. We’ve also had Michael Hastings’ death by a car explosion he had told his friend that he feared that very night. And Sharyl Atkisson had her computers turn on and off in the middle of the night, apparently to intimidate her into silence shortly after one of the White House thugs had cussed at her and told her to stop investigating Fast and Furious and Benghazi. James Rosen and his whole family had their phone lines tapped. A reporter who had done an expose’ of corruption in the Coast Guard had her confidential notes stolen by federal agents without a warrant for those notes when they were executing a warrant for her husband’s potato gun...

The long and the short of it? As long as the media can be threatened and/or killed into silence and will mock people like Freepers when we are the only ones left who will state the obvious... impeachment will not be successful in ousting anybody.

BUT impeachment is a way to get access to the evidence and expose the truth TO NON-FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT who actually CAN protect themselves while investigating potential state crimes committed by the Obama regime’s key players. And if Congress had the balls and wisdom to use that leverage perhaps something could come of it. For instance, if the HDOH was exposed as crooked, criminal scum (who broke every law in the books to create forged and falsified documents to cover for Obama’s ineligibility) at the same time as Congress got rid of all the pork to Hawaii, maybe somebody there would wake up and smell the coffee - realizing that the rest of the country doesn’t particularly like having our national security (and the country’s actual survival) jeopardized by the mafia in HI, and we are willing to do what it takes to stop that, even if we’ve got a crooked criminal in the AG’s office obstructing federal justice...

I think we have to do a no-BS assessment of what parts of our protective infrastructure are compromised/infiltrated by enemies and come up with a strategy based on what we still have left to work with. Impeachment won’t work to oust anybody because the US Senate has been taken by the enemy. But impeachment CAN work to get access to the evidence which can then be used by STATE law enforcement which may still be intact. The media and courts have already been taken as well, although the utter failure of Obamacare is waking up normal people to a level that is emboldening some of the media people to tiptoe forward with stuff they should have been proclaiming loudly years ago. - (bold and color emphasis added)

17 posted on Thursday, November 14, 2013 9:29:57 AM by butterdezillion (Free online faxing at http://faxzero.com/ Fax all your elected officials. Make DC listen.)