Tweet
Report: Obama ID Fraud Time Of Reckoning Coming; If Not U.S. Media, Perhaps Canada?
Birther Report
11/30/2014
Excerpt:
If Not the U.S. Media, Then Perhaps Canada?
“A TIME OF RECKONING”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 29, 2014) — In an editorial dated November 26, 2014, Calgary Sun columnist Marc Patrone wrote that “America is a mess and the world can barely tear its eyes away from the unfolding train wreck.”
In his column Patrone asserts that “the media, to its eternal, traitorous disgrace, has gone full Benedict Arnold. They have been a Democratic lapdog so long, they now act as if they have no choice but to continue protecting Obama.”
The day after the November 4 elections, Patrone criticized Barack Hussein Obama for ” the disdain, arrogance and contempt with which this president dismissed the results” in a reference to Obama’s statement that he “heard” the “the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process.”
Patrone lists a litany of complaints about the Obama regime, including the IRS targeting scandal, Obama’s apparent appeasement or even facilitation of relations with the rogue nation of Iran intent on achieving nuclear status, and “a shameless attempt to silence online critics” through his “net neutrality” advocacy.
Obama maintains that “net neutrality” must be “protected” by “a new set of rules” by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which Obama describes as “an independent agency.”
The IRS is also expected to be “independent” of the White House, but the recent discovery of approximately 30,000 emails which the agency said were lost without backup said to contain 2,500 communications with White House staff may constitute an impeachable offense, according to political pundit Dick Morris and others.
On November 7, Patrone predicted that Obama would use the “nuclear option” of “amnesty for millions of illegals,” which Obama announced on November 20 after promising that he would “work with Republican lawmakers” on important issues going forward.
After insisting on 25 different occasions that he was not authorized to act alone in changing immigration policies, Obama announced on November 20 that through his “executive actions,” relatives of young people shielded from deportation proceedings by his 2012 DACA declaration would also receive relief from the same if they were not hardened criminals and paid fines. On the same day, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued new policy directives stating that only the most serious criminals would be given top priority for removal from the country by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
Democrats have defended Obama’s actions by stating that previous presidents have issued executive orders on immigration matters, but many believe that Obama has usurped the authority to make law granted to Congress in Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, who for the last several months has led a special investigation into the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya in September 2012, told Fox News anchor Bill O’Reilly before Obama’s announcement that if Obama “wants a solution, he’ll wait” until the new Congress convenes in January. Gowdy characterized Obama’s impending declaration as not a “fight with the Republicans,” but rather, “a fight with the people who founded this republic.”
When O’Reilly asked Gowdy about Fox News commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano’s claim that Obama’s “making a new law” is an impeachable offense, Gowdy responded, “Have you met Joe Biden?” and “Impeachment is a punishment; it’s not a remedy.”
Some disagree with Gowdy’s contention that impeachment is only a “punishment.” One writer whose essay was widely publicized stated that “The impeachment process was part of the carefully crafted system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and limited government with the consent of the governed, and other enlightened principles inherent to a constitutional republic.”
In Federalist #65, Founding Father Alexander Hamilton acknowledged that impeachments could be “political,” and Founding Father James Iredell stated that “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct.“
Three Democrat staffers to whom this writer spoke last week were unable to point to the constitutional authority Obama allegedly has to “change the law” on deportations, as Obama admitted to having done to an audience in Chicago on Tuesday.
Patrone also cited Obama for having “fanned the flames of grievance and hatred” in regard to the violent protests in Ferguson, MO which occurred after a grand jury failed to issue a “True Bill” of indictment against Officer Darren Wilson for killing Michael Brown on August 9.
Missouri’s lieutenant governor suspects that the Obama White House was involved in the absence of the state’s National Guard in Ferguson on the evening of the prosecutor’s announcement, when considerable destruction of businesses, police cars and personal property occurred at the hands of angry protesters.
On Saturday, The Post & Email responded to Patrone’s editorial.
Dear Mr. Patrone:
I have read your column of November 26 in which you wrote that “America must fight to survive the Obama debacle” and in which you revealed that you have received many emails from concerned citizens asking “What do we do now?”
Although I am primarily a writer of “hard” news and not an editorialist, let me first state that those of us here in the U.S. with the same concerns appreciate the fact that someone in the media, anywhere, is writing about the “debacle” which has worsened almost daily since the man known as “Barack Hussein Obama” began his occupation of the Oval Office in January 2009.
Since you are willing to unreservedly write about your observations of the impact Obama’s actions are having on the United States and the world, there is something you and others can do to put a stop to it: expose the depths of deception to which the Obama regime went to catapult and maintain this man in the Oval Office for the last six years.
Beginning in late 2007, doubts began to surface about Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president and commander-in-chief based on Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The “natural born Citizen” clause, though hotly debated and now watered down from its original meaning, involved the allegiance of the person’s parents as well as his birthplace. Questions about Sen. John McCain’s eligibility were also raised given that he was born to two U.S.-citizen parents in Panama. Early in 2008, NBC News reported that “many legal scholars and government lawyers say it’s a serious question with no clear answer.”
NBC further stated:
It seems clear only that the founders wanted to make certain that whoever was president would be loyal to the U.S. alone and not to some other country. But the term “natural born citizen,” many scholars say, was not in common use at the time the Constitution was written.
The press never questioned Obama about his background, childhood, parentage or his exotic life story while claiming to be a “natural born Citizen.”
Similarly, Sen. Ted Cruz, born in your city of Calgary in December 1970, now is reportedly planning to run for president despite his foreign birthplace and foreign-citizen father at the time of his birth. Following a FOIA request I made on October 21, the U.S. State Department has failed to confirm even the existence of a certificate that by law would have had to have been filed upon Cruz’s birth indicating that a U.S. birth “abroad” occurred.
The evisceration of the “natural born Citizen” clause has also led to speculation that Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, South Carolina Nikki Haley, and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio will run for president, all of whom were born in this country to parents who were, at the time, citizens of foreign countries and therefore possessing allegiance to those nations.
In December 2007, left-leaning MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews declared that Obama was “born in Indonesia” and asked his guest if she speculated that then-Democrat presidential primary contender Hillary Clinton would raise that issue to disqualify or cast doubt on Obama’s eligibility. Some have reported, although a video clip cannot be found, that during an early primary debate, Clinton said to Obama, “You can’t run for president; you’re not a ‘natural born Citizen.’”
In 2012, a film producer told Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND that Bill Clinton had referred to Obama as “the non-citizen” and was convinced that he was “born in Kenya.”
Obama claims a father who was never a citizen of the United States, which alone, during the founding days of the Republic and later, would have disqualified him and should have disqualified him in 2008 for more reasons than we knew at the time.
....................................
Source link. © 2014, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/11...reckoning.html
Birther Report
11/30/2014
Excerpt:
If Not the U.S. Media, Then Perhaps Canada?
“A TIME OF RECKONING”
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 29, 2014) — In an editorial dated November 26, 2014, Calgary Sun columnist Marc Patrone wrote that “America is a mess and the world can barely tear its eyes away from the unfolding train wreck.”
In his column Patrone asserts that “the media, to its eternal, traitorous disgrace, has gone full Benedict Arnold. They have been a Democratic lapdog so long, they now act as if they have no choice but to continue protecting Obama.”
The day after the November 4 elections, Patrone criticized Barack Hussein Obama for ” the disdain, arrogance and contempt with which this president dismissed the results” in a reference to Obama’s statement that he “heard” the “the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process.”
Patrone lists a litany of complaints about the Obama regime, including the IRS targeting scandal, Obama’s apparent appeasement or even facilitation of relations with the rogue nation of Iran intent on achieving nuclear status, and “a shameless attempt to silence online critics” through his “net neutrality” advocacy.
Obama maintains that “net neutrality” must be “protected” by “a new set of rules” by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which Obama describes as “an independent agency.”
The IRS is also expected to be “independent” of the White House, but the recent discovery of approximately 30,000 emails which the agency said were lost without backup said to contain 2,500 communications with White House staff may constitute an impeachable offense, according to political pundit Dick Morris and others.
On November 7, Patrone predicted that Obama would use the “nuclear option” of “amnesty for millions of illegals,” which Obama announced on November 20 after promising that he would “work with Republican lawmakers” on important issues going forward.
After insisting on 25 different occasions that he was not authorized to act alone in changing immigration policies, Obama announced on November 20 that through his “executive actions,” relatives of young people shielded from deportation proceedings by his 2012 DACA declaration would also receive relief from the same if they were not hardened criminals and paid fines. On the same day, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued new policy directives stating that only the most serious criminals would be given top priority for removal from the country by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents.
Democrats have defended Obama’s actions by stating that previous presidents have issued executive orders on immigration matters, but many believe that Obama has usurped the authority to make law granted to Congress in Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
Rep. Trey Gowdy, who for the last several months has led a special investigation into the deaths of four Americans in Benghazi, Libya in September 2012, told Fox News anchor Bill O’Reilly before Obama’s announcement that if Obama “wants a solution, he’ll wait” until the new Congress convenes in January. Gowdy characterized Obama’s impending declaration as not a “fight with the Republicans,” but rather, “a fight with the people who founded this republic.”
When O’Reilly asked Gowdy about Fox News commentator Judge Andrew Napolitano’s claim that Obama’s “making a new law” is an impeachable offense, Gowdy responded, “Have you met Joe Biden?” and “Impeachment is a punishment; it’s not a remedy.”
Some disagree with Gowdy’s contention that impeachment is only a “punishment.” One writer whose essay was widely publicized stated that “The impeachment process was part of the carefully crafted system of checks and balances, separation of powers, and limited government with the consent of the governed, and other enlightened principles inherent to a constitutional republic.”
In Federalist #65, Founding Father Alexander Hamilton acknowledged that impeachments could be “political,” and Founding Father James Iredell stated that “Every government requires it [impeachment]. Every man ought to be amenable for his conduct.“
Three Democrat staffers to whom this writer spoke last week were unable to point to the constitutional authority Obama allegedly has to “change the law” on deportations, as Obama admitted to having done to an audience in Chicago on Tuesday.
Patrone also cited Obama for having “fanned the flames of grievance and hatred” in regard to the violent protests in Ferguson, MO which occurred after a grand jury failed to issue a “True Bill” of indictment against Officer Darren Wilson for killing Michael Brown on August 9.
Missouri’s lieutenant governor suspects that the Obama White House was involved in the absence of the state’s National Guard in Ferguson on the evening of the prosecutor’s announcement, when considerable destruction of businesses, police cars and personal property occurred at the hands of angry protesters.
On Saturday, The Post & Email responded to Patrone’s editorial.
Dear Mr. Patrone:
I have read your column of November 26 in which you wrote that “America must fight to survive the Obama debacle” and in which you revealed that you have received many emails from concerned citizens asking “What do we do now?”
Although I am primarily a writer of “hard” news and not an editorialist, let me first state that those of us here in the U.S. with the same concerns appreciate the fact that someone in the media, anywhere, is writing about the “debacle” which has worsened almost daily since the man known as “Barack Hussein Obama” began his occupation of the Oval Office in January 2009.
Since you are willing to unreservedly write about your observations of the impact Obama’s actions are having on the United States and the world, there is something you and others can do to put a stop to it: expose the depths of deception to which the Obama regime went to catapult and maintain this man in the Oval Office for the last six years.
Beginning in late 2007, doubts began to surface about Obama’s constitutional eligibility to serve as president and commander-in-chief based on Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
The “natural born Citizen” clause, though hotly debated and now watered down from its original meaning, involved the allegiance of the person’s parents as well as his birthplace. Questions about Sen. John McCain’s eligibility were also raised given that he was born to two U.S.-citizen parents in Panama. Early in 2008, NBC News reported that “many legal scholars and government lawyers say it’s a serious question with no clear answer.”
NBC further stated:
It seems clear only that the founders wanted to make certain that whoever was president would be loyal to the U.S. alone and not to some other country. But the term “natural born citizen,” many scholars say, was not in common use at the time the Constitution was written.
The press never questioned Obama about his background, childhood, parentage or his exotic life story while claiming to be a “natural born Citizen.”
Similarly, Sen. Ted Cruz, born in your city of Calgary in December 1970, now is reportedly planning to run for president despite his foreign birthplace and foreign-citizen father at the time of his birth. Following a FOIA request I made on October 21, the U.S. State Department has failed to confirm even the existence of a certificate that by law would have had to have been filed upon Cruz’s birth indicating that a U.S. birth “abroad” occurred.
The evisceration of the “natural born Citizen” clause has also led to speculation that Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, South Carolina Nikki Haley, and Florida Sen. Marco Rubio will run for president, all of whom were born in this country to parents who were, at the time, citizens of foreign countries and therefore possessing allegiance to those nations.
In December 2007, left-leaning MSNBC commentator Chris Matthews declared that Obama was “born in Indonesia” and asked his guest if she speculated that then-Democrat presidential primary contender Hillary Clinton would raise that issue to disqualify or cast doubt on Obama’s eligibility. Some have reported, although a video clip cannot be found, that during an early primary debate, Clinton said to Obama, “You can’t run for president; you’re not a ‘natural born Citizen.’”
In 2012, a film producer told Dr. Jerome Corsi of WND that Bill Clinton had referred to Obama as “the non-citizen” and was convinced that he was “born in Kenya.”
Obama claims a father who was never a citizen of the United States, which alone, during the founding days of the Republic and later, would have disqualified him and should have disqualified him in 2008 for more reasons than we knew at the time.
....................................
Source link. © 2014, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/11...reckoning.html