Tweet
Forgerygate, Or How The US Was Tricked: The Conclusion Of Operation Sideshow
The Western Center for Journalism
Alan P. Halbert
4/30/2012
Excerpt:
Part 11: Conclusion
"Facts and nothing but the facts with documents that have been deemed forgeries by a credible Law Enforcement Agency of the State of Arizona"
"A press gaggle had been hastily called on the afternoon of April 26, 2011 to debut Obama’s newly found long-form birth certificate for the next morning, the 27th. This briefing was done “old school” with the press corps being barred from using any audio or video recording of the event forcing them to use only pen and paper for any notes. This practice was extremely rare within the James S. Brady press briefing room and was usually only followed when they were on Air Force One or Two or other secure locations for security purposes. We do not have to guess the motives of the president’s agents at this gaggle, they were being deceptive.
The complicity of the State of Hawaii and several officials in their guarded and misleading statements from the Health Department and the Attorney Generals office had started in 2008 one week before the general election. The changing of the name of birth certificates or certifications (COLB) sometime in 2009 is another reason to doubt their veracity. Their duplicitous statements regarding the ability to receive a true and certified copy of an original document and impeached by the requirements of the State of Hawaii Homelands Heritage Agency itself, to require only the long-form birth certificate prior to sometime in 2009. Hawaiian Statute §338-18 refutes all the hyperbole of the officials in this matter as it was only “departmental policy” of the Health Department and not “law” as these officials continually stated. This corroborates the statements of Mile Zullo from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office about Hawaiian officials being complicit at least at some level; by their own deceptive statements, they have in essence self-impugned their own credibility.
We have the contradictory comments and actions of Neil Abercrombie the Governor of Hawaii who vowed to release Obama’s birth records in December of 2010 and by late January 2011 had retreated from all of his previous statements. However, on Tuesday January 18, 2011 he stated to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Obama did not have a hospital-generated long form birth certificate and the official record only consisted of a “unspecified notation or listing“. Four short months later on April 27, 2011 the Governor makes a press release of his own in conjunction with Obama’s “sideshow” message and tacitly intimates that Obama has a hospital generated long-form birth certificate. It is signed by Dr. David A. Sinclair who had conveniently died in 2003 as evidenced by the now fraudulent and discredited document posted on whitehouse.gov. This forgery had been substituted for the official “certified certificates of live birth” he received on the 25th through his personal attorney.
The long-form birth certificate is so poorly forged that it claims Obama’s Father’s race classification as “African” when the National Center for Health Statistics of the Public Health Service used the official term “Negro” to denote a person of color in 1961. All States and Territories were required to use the National Center for Health Statistics race classifications by federal law in the collection and reporting of vital statistics. Pencil mark notations are seen on his long-form certificate, and was a national reporting requirement from the National Vital Statistics Division which required data be taken from certain birth certificates for statistical analysis. The oddity about Obama’s certificate is that is was only required on “even” numbered documents, his forged document is numbered “61 10641″ an “odd” numbered document so it would not have had these penciled-in notations for data collection. On it’s face it is a fraudulent document without any type of analysis needing to be performed.
Officials of a credible law enforcement agency of the State of Arizona has leveled charges of forgery and fraud and that “probable cause” of a federal crime exists over Obama’s latest “Certificate of Live Birth” and his Selective Service Registration card. Without having one, he could not have been elected to federal office. Investigators also found that Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) microfiche records for the week of Aug. 1st thru 7th of 1961 from Hawaii were missing at the National Archives in Washington.
Selective Service Administration officials have refused as of March 28, 2012 to permit examination of Obama’s original Select Service Registration card to court approved forensic examiners of Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office investigators.
Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker filed a concurrence in denial of a mandamus petition over a request for an original copy of his long-form birth certificate be filed with the State in the Courts Order dismissing the petition. This statement lends credence that Obama’s fraudulent birth documents would have significant evidentiary value of forgery and fraud in the proper forum though was made in a failed ballot challenge from Alabama. Justice Parker is referring to the findings by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office in his concurrence."
................................................
View the complete article at:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/the...tion-sideshow/
The Western Center for Journalism
Alan P. Halbert
4/30/2012
Excerpt:
Part 11: Conclusion
"Facts and nothing but the facts with documents that have been deemed forgeries by a credible Law Enforcement Agency of the State of Arizona"
"A press gaggle had been hastily called on the afternoon of April 26, 2011 to debut Obama’s newly found long-form birth certificate for the next morning, the 27th. This briefing was done “old school” with the press corps being barred from using any audio or video recording of the event forcing them to use only pen and paper for any notes. This practice was extremely rare within the James S. Brady press briefing room and was usually only followed when they were on Air Force One or Two or other secure locations for security purposes. We do not have to guess the motives of the president’s agents at this gaggle, they were being deceptive.
The complicity of the State of Hawaii and several officials in their guarded and misleading statements from the Health Department and the Attorney Generals office had started in 2008 one week before the general election. The changing of the name of birth certificates or certifications (COLB) sometime in 2009 is another reason to doubt their veracity. Their duplicitous statements regarding the ability to receive a true and certified copy of an original document and impeached by the requirements of the State of Hawaii Homelands Heritage Agency itself, to require only the long-form birth certificate prior to sometime in 2009. Hawaiian Statute §338-18 refutes all the hyperbole of the officials in this matter as it was only “departmental policy” of the Health Department and not “law” as these officials continually stated. This corroborates the statements of Mile Zullo from the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office about Hawaiian officials being complicit at least at some level; by their own deceptive statements, they have in essence self-impugned their own credibility.
We have the contradictory comments and actions of Neil Abercrombie the Governor of Hawaii who vowed to release Obama’s birth records in December of 2010 and by late January 2011 had retreated from all of his previous statements. However, on Tuesday January 18, 2011 he stated to the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Obama did not have a hospital-generated long form birth certificate and the official record only consisted of a “unspecified notation or listing“. Four short months later on April 27, 2011 the Governor makes a press release of his own in conjunction with Obama’s “sideshow” message and tacitly intimates that Obama has a hospital generated long-form birth certificate. It is signed by Dr. David A. Sinclair who had conveniently died in 2003 as evidenced by the now fraudulent and discredited document posted on whitehouse.gov. This forgery had been substituted for the official “certified certificates of live birth” he received on the 25th through his personal attorney.
The long-form birth certificate is so poorly forged that it claims Obama’s Father’s race classification as “African” when the National Center for Health Statistics of the Public Health Service used the official term “Negro” to denote a person of color in 1961. All States and Territories were required to use the National Center for Health Statistics race classifications by federal law in the collection and reporting of vital statistics. Pencil mark notations are seen on his long-form certificate, and was a national reporting requirement from the National Vital Statistics Division which required data be taken from certain birth certificates for statistical analysis. The oddity about Obama’s certificate is that is was only required on “even” numbered documents, his forged document is numbered “61 10641″ an “odd” numbered document so it would not have had these penciled-in notations for data collection. On it’s face it is a fraudulent document without any type of analysis needing to be performed.
Officials of a credible law enforcement agency of the State of Arizona has leveled charges of forgery and fraud and that “probable cause” of a federal crime exists over Obama’s latest “Certificate of Live Birth” and his Selective Service Registration card. Without having one, he could not have been elected to federal office. Investigators also found that Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) microfiche records for the week of Aug. 1st thru 7th of 1961 from Hawaii were missing at the National Archives in Washington.
Selective Service Administration officials have refused as of March 28, 2012 to permit examination of Obama’s original Select Service Registration card to court approved forensic examiners of Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office investigators.
Alabama State Supreme Court Justice Tom Parker filed a concurrence in denial of a mandamus petition over a request for an original copy of his long-form birth certificate be filed with the State in the Courts Order dismissing the petition. This statement lends credence that Obama’s fraudulent birth documents would have significant evidentiary value of forgery and fraud in the proper forum though was made in a failed ballot challenge from Alabama. Justice Parker is referring to the findings by Maricopa County Sheriff‘s office in his concurrence."
................................................
View the complete article at:
http://www.westernjournalism.com/the...tion-sideshow/