Tweet
Birth Certificate Questions the Press Won’t Ask
h2ooflife
6/20/2012
Excerpt:
"Late April, 2011 after the White House release of a pdf image of Barack Hussein Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.
Thank you Mr. President for finally vetting yourself. We’re glad it only took 3 years and not 7 or 8. You could have waited even longer if you wanted to, it was all up to you.
I hope we didn’t annoy you or take up too much of your valuable vacation time with the issue of your eligibility. Uhhh…forgive me for bringing this up but I think the issue of your eligibility still exists (though no one seems to even have a clue that that is so). But about the vetting…uhhh who has vetted the new document that has been “released”?
I’d just like to know the name of the Hawaiian official who has certified under oath that it was sent from the Hawaiian Dept. of Health, and also what’s the name of the document expert that has certified the thing to be genuine? What’s that? It hasn’t been vetted by anybody? Uhhhh….then we know it’s not a counterfeit how?
Trust you, you say? Well, I kind of do, the document looks totally real but then I’m no expert so forgive me if I don’t trust in my own document verification skills. I’d like to “trust but verify” by letting a real document expert have a peek at it. Would that be OK?
No? But why not? I’m sure it would be good to just get this all behind us, so won’t you just lend it to an impartial expert for an hour? Would that not be something the American people should expect of their President?
I don’t want to be disrespectful, but just for the sake of history, it would look better if you allowed someone to fully vet your birth certificate. Think of it as a teeny-weeny version of the FBI background check that you were never subjected to.
Is there some reason for which you can’t allow it to be out of your sight? Come to think of it, has it ever been in your sight?
When you appeared in the press room on the occasion of its release, it was whisked away by your White House lawyer before you entered the room? Was that meant to avoid any connection between it and you?
And why did he resign the very next day and put some plausible-deniability distance between himself and you, -the President? Was he more valuable to you as your new private attorney than he was as your White House council? What would be the reason for the reversal of your relationship with the man who obtained the pdf from Hawaii for you the days before?
During your appearance in the Press Briefing Room, was there some reason that you failed to even mention the document that was the reason for your appearance before the cameras and the press?
Why did you avoid any contact with, proximity to, or mention of what was to be the final and preeminent proof of your identity and place of birth?
Would you please share whatever is the simple explanation for what some folks might view as strange behavior? Why not defuse their suspicions before they smolder and explode into a full blown conspiracy theory?
Can you please display it in the Press room so the nation’s reporters can see, scruntinize and photograph it?
No? We only get the pdf digital file and the B&W printout made from it?
But if we are allowed to download and examine the high resolution pdf, then what’s wrong with examining the real thing? After all, you ordered two of them according to the letters you made public.
Why can’t the American people have access to the only form of proof of who it is that they entrusted with all the power and might of the nation?
The answer is still “no”? Such a refusal might inspire one to postulate a reason for it. A reason such as “maybe the pdf is the only version that exists”.(!) “Maybe there is no “two copies” on actual hard-copy certified Hawaiian document paper.”
Of course if that were actually true, then that would mean that the facts have been misrepresented, that the whole story of procuring them via special permission is an elaborate fiction with deception as its sole motive.
Of course that would mean that the pdf is a big question mark, leaving reasonable people to wonder; “where did it come from? Did it come from the Hawaiian government? If so, why would they issue such a multi-layered thing to anybody? If not, then who the heck made it, and by whose order?
Wouldn’t you like to head these questions off at the pass? Why let them fester unanswered? That surely is in no one’s best interest, -or is it? I know, more questions, -more suspicions. I apologize, but I simply can’t help myself. Curiosity just seems to be a part of my nature. For instances, I’m really, really curious to know how the pdf came to have 9 layers that no scanner in the word would have produced.
Was it supposed to be flattened before being put online? Was there some sort of rushed last-minute over-sight? That would explain the layers being visible….but, what exactly explains their existence?"
................................................
View the complete article at:
http://h2ooflife.wordpress.com/2012/...ress-wont-ask/
h2ooflife
6/20/2012
Excerpt:
"Late April, 2011 after the White House release of a pdf image of Barack Hussein Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.
Thank you Mr. President for finally vetting yourself. We’re glad it only took 3 years and not 7 or 8. You could have waited even longer if you wanted to, it was all up to you.
I hope we didn’t annoy you or take up too much of your valuable vacation time with the issue of your eligibility. Uhhh…forgive me for bringing this up but I think the issue of your eligibility still exists (though no one seems to even have a clue that that is so). But about the vetting…uhhh who has vetted the new document that has been “released”?
I’d just like to know the name of the Hawaiian official who has certified under oath that it was sent from the Hawaiian Dept. of Health, and also what’s the name of the document expert that has certified the thing to be genuine? What’s that? It hasn’t been vetted by anybody? Uhhhh….then we know it’s not a counterfeit how?
Trust you, you say? Well, I kind of do, the document looks totally real but then I’m no expert so forgive me if I don’t trust in my own document verification skills. I’d like to “trust but verify” by letting a real document expert have a peek at it. Would that be OK?
No? But why not? I’m sure it would be good to just get this all behind us, so won’t you just lend it to an impartial expert for an hour? Would that not be something the American people should expect of their President?
I don’t want to be disrespectful, but just for the sake of history, it would look better if you allowed someone to fully vet your birth certificate. Think of it as a teeny-weeny version of the FBI background check that you were never subjected to.
Is there some reason for which you can’t allow it to be out of your sight? Come to think of it, has it ever been in your sight?
When you appeared in the press room on the occasion of its release, it was whisked away by your White House lawyer before you entered the room? Was that meant to avoid any connection between it and you?
And why did he resign the very next day and put some plausible-deniability distance between himself and you, -the President? Was he more valuable to you as your new private attorney than he was as your White House council? What would be the reason for the reversal of your relationship with the man who obtained the pdf from Hawaii for you the days before?
During your appearance in the Press Briefing Room, was there some reason that you failed to even mention the document that was the reason for your appearance before the cameras and the press?
Why did you avoid any contact with, proximity to, or mention of what was to be the final and preeminent proof of your identity and place of birth?
Would you please share whatever is the simple explanation for what some folks might view as strange behavior? Why not defuse their suspicions before they smolder and explode into a full blown conspiracy theory?
Can you please display it in the Press room so the nation’s reporters can see, scruntinize and photograph it?
No? We only get the pdf digital file and the B&W printout made from it?
But if we are allowed to download and examine the high resolution pdf, then what’s wrong with examining the real thing? After all, you ordered two of them according to the letters you made public.
Why can’t the American people have access to the only form of proof of who it is that they entrusted with all the power and might of the nation?
The answer is still “no”? Such a refusal might inspire one to postulate a reason for it. A reason such as “maybe the pdf is the only version that exists”.(!) “Maybe there is no “two copies” on actual hard-copy certified Hawaiian document paper.”
Of course if that were actually true, then that would mean that the facts have been misrepresented, that the whole story of procuring them via special permission is an elaborate fiction with deception as its sole motive.
Of course that would mean that the pdf is a big question mark, leaving reasonable people to wonder; “where did it come from? Did it come from the Hawaiian government? If so, why would they issue such a multi-layered thing to anybody? If not, then who the heck made it, and by whose order?
Wouldn’t you like to head these questions off at the pass? Why let them fester unanswered? That surely is in no one’s best interest, -or is it? I know, more questions, -more suspicions. I apologize, but I simply can’t help myself. Curiosity just seems to be a part of my nature. For instances, I’m really, really curious to know how the pdf came to have 9 layers that no scanner in the word would have produced.
Was it supposed to be flattened before being put online? Was there some sort of rushed last-minute over-sight? That would explain the layers being visible….but, what exactly explains their existence?"
................................................
View the complete article at:
http://h2ooflife.wordpress.com/2012/...ress-wont-ask/