Tweet
PRESIDENTIAL ILLEGITIMACY: OBAMA'S PERISHING DILEMMA
The Daily Pen
Dan Crosby
10/9/2012
Excerpt:
"NEW YORK, NY - It requires a truly reprobate mind to cause someone to refuse the preeminent definition of natural-born citizenship as it was understood by the framers. They declared the Consititutional eligibilty mandate in the critical time which required it...and forever more, because it was normal and common to them.
Willful ignorance and shame consumes the ideologue unwilling to accept that those who came centuries before them declared natural-born eligibility from a righteous perspective rooted in an eyewitness understanding of the need to disqualify tyranny born of foul parentage, primarily, not just geographic origin.
The founders saw first hand that Monarchal inbreeding put sovereignty at risk, so they refused to allow that risk to take hold their new nation. War mongers abound, boundaries are indefensible, but blood-ransomed thrones are not. The founders foreknew borders could be created and changed and be violated, but parentage is eternally founded in the natural laws of God and, therefore, so is natural-born citizenship. Hence, Article II was born.
Only liars and reprobates remain dissonant to this universal truth because they can't let go of their fetish for a transient celebrity.
Yet, the position that Obama's eligibility hinges only upon a geographic natal origin fails foolishly when mortally impaled by two facts: Obama, himself, voted to uphold SR 511 which declared his 2008 opponent, John McCain a Natural Born citizen explicitly because McCain was born to two citizen parents. If the question of natural born citizenship is merely endowed by earth-birth, why did Obama and so many of his esteemed degenerates not disqualify the Panamanian-born McCain? Because, the question of McCain's natural-born eligibility was resolved as a matter of natural law founded in PARENTAGE and natal identity, not his birth within transient geographic boundaries from which anyone may be removed or enter from anywhere at any time.
If Obama’s only claim to eligibility is that he was born in a geographic region under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution, then why did he vote in support of a resolution declaring the natural-born eligibility of man who was NOT born in a geographic region under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution? Because, the law has an unrelenting grip upon his soul and mind and his only option is to lie about who he really is while casting his own dilemma onto others. He is a deceiver, through and through.
Second, the framers of the Constitution explicitly differentiate language for natural-born citizenship from mere common citizenship as an exaction of two absolutes founded in the natural laws of God, not the laws of man. Having only recently established this new nation, they were at a disadvantage, militarily, to defend it’s borders from invasion, indefinitely. However, they could defend the sovereignty of their new government and, therefore, the strength of their constitutional resolve by declaring that the President be a natural born citizen in the common sense, by citizenship of their parentage. For no parents who were citizens of the U.S. in 1787 could conspicuously bear a foreign child to raised among the "brethren" and, later, betray the blood of patriots by becoming a tyrant unopposed. His parentage was an indicator of his loyalty and intentions."
.................................................. .........
View the complete article at:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012...cy-obamas.html
The Daily Pen
Dan Crosby
10/9/2012
Excerpt:
"NEW YORK, NY - It requires a truly reprobate mind to cause someone to refuse the preeminent definition of natural-born citizenship as it was understood by the framers. They declared the Consititutional eligibilty mandate in the critical time which required it...and forever more, because it was normal and common to them.
Willful ignorance and shame consumes the ideologue unwilling to accept that those who came centuries before them declared natural-born eligibility from a righteous perspective rooted in an eyewitness understanding of the need to disqualify tyranny born of foul parentage, primarily, not just geographic origin.
The founders saw first hand that Monarchal inbreeding put sovereignty at risk, so they refused to allow that risk to take hold their new nation. War mongers abound, boundaries are indefensible, but blood-ransomed thrones are not. The founders foreknew borders could be created and changed and be violated, but parentage is eternally founded in the natural laws of God and, therefore, so is natural-born citizenship. Hence, Article II was born.
Only liars and reprobates remain dissonant to this universal truth because they can't let go of their fetish for a transient celebrity.
Yet, the position that Obama's eligibility hinges only upon a geographic natal origin fails foolishly when mortally impaled by two facts: Obama, himself, voted to uphold SR 511 which declared his 2008 opponent, John McCain a Natural Born citizen explicitly because McCain was born to two citizen parents. If the question of natural born citizenship is merely endowed by earth-birth, why did Obama and so many of his esteemed degenerates not disqualify the Panamanian-born McCain? Because, the question of McCain's natural-born eligibility was resolved as a matter of natural law founded in PARENTAGE and natal identity, not his birth within transient geographic boundaries from which anyone may be removed or enter from anywhere at any time.
If Obama’s only claim to eligibility is that he was born in a geographic region under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution, then why did he vote in support of a resolution declaring the natural-born eligibility of man who was NOT born in a geographic region under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution? Because, the law has an unrelenting grip upon his soul and mind and his only option is to lie about who he really is while casting his own dilemma onto others. He is a deceiver, through and through.
Second, the framers of the Constitution explicitly differentiate language for natural-born citizenship from mere common citizenship as an exaction of two absolutes founded in the natural laws of God, not the laws of man. Having only recently established this new nation, they were at a disadvantage, militarily, to defend it’s borders from invasion, indefinitely. However, they could defend the sovereignty of their new government and, therefore, the strength of their constitutional resolve by declaring that the President be a natural born citizen in the common sense, by citizenship of their parentage. For no parents who were citizens of the U.S. in 1787 could conspicuously bear a foreign child to raised among the "brethren" and, later, betray the blood of patriots by becoming a tyrant unopposed. His parentage was an indicator of his loyalty and intentions."
.................................................. .........
View the complete article at:
http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012...cy-obamas.html