Obama to Ignore GA Subpoena and Head to Las Vegas Jan 26th -- Free Republic Thread

[bsteadman]

President Obama To Ignore Georgia Subpoena And Head To Las Vegas Jan 26th.

Free Republic thread started 1/22/2012 by 'Obama Exposer'

"President Obama plans to head out on a 3 day trip arriving in Las Vegas Wednesday afternoon and staying overnight well into Thursday. That afternoon he will leave for Denver and then Detroit. The president plans to promote his State of the Union address. With this action, President Obama intends to ignore a legal judicial subpoena from the state of Georgia requesting him, by name, to appear in court January 26th 2012 at 9am in Judge Michael Malihi's courtroom. Barack Obama's attempt as a candidate to be on the state ballot in Georgia has been officially legally challenged by state citizens in a official administrative hearing before a judge who was appointed by Governor Zell Miller, a democrat at the time.

It is important to know that, once you are given a subpoena or summons, you are legally required to attend the proceeding indicated on the document and serve as a witness for the case in question. Failure to comply with the court’s order can lead to severe penalties, including a warrant being issued for your arrest. In some states, you may even be fined, lose your driver’s license, or spend time in jail if do not appear at the proceeding indicated in the subpoena. As of now it appears Barack Obama will ignore the subpoena, upheld by Judge Malihi in his denial of the Presidents 'Motion to Quash', and carry on with his trip to 'Sin City' and beyond. It's also apparent that Barack Obama doesn't intend to show up in court and ensure the American people that he is indeed a natural born Citizen to be president as required by Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the United States Constitution."

View the Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2836407/posts

[bsteadman]

(1) Particularly Interesting Comments in the Referenced Free Repubic Thread

COMMENT #45 (Obama Exposer):

"From what I am hearing now is that Obama is trying to set it up for some kind of mis-trial type appeal where he can claim he got incompetent representation by Jablonski for the ballot hearing? He could then attempt to get another judge of their liking to hold the hearing in front of?"

COMMENT #67 (Goldwater Girl):

Excerpt:

"The subpoena to appear was challenged by BHO’s Georgia lawyer, but his motion to quash was very poorly written. So the administrative law judge denied the motion to quash, but wrote the reason was because he cited no legal precedent or applicable law supporting his motion.

Hubby says it looks like it was written by a first year law student, and offended the judge.
So! He expects the lawyer to rewrite the motion correctly and resubmit it on Monday.

Or they could just show up with the requested documents. Either way, the judge would take some time to rule, so the 1/26 date is likely to be changed."

COMMENT #106 (jdirt):

"Judge Malihi)... will make a ruling at some point and then it will be up to the SoS. I think one can appeal to the Supreme Ct of GA after that.

But anyway what intrigues me about this case is the numerous historical documents talking about NBC. How do you argue against that? The only thing that the Obama attorney can argue is that the historical documents are wrong or that is not what they meant but as far as evidence supporting his position, he has none. So if this was a just hearing, the citizens should win the ruling. But if the judge rules against NBC all 3 will fail after the Judge rules that forged documents are not germane to qualifications.

However, one could argue that if the selective service record is a fraud, then Obama can’t hold office...."

COMMENT #111 (jdirt):

“All we can do is push as hard/far as we can and hope that the people ultimately rule correctly via the ballot box for every elected official involved.” (Comment #109 by 'Norm Lenhart')

"Well thats a nice thought but I think that really only a handful of people in the country really understand the legal and future consequences of all this. Dems have no problem with who votes in elections, why would they care who they are voting for. Look at the county that raised hell when they took the Rs and Ds off the ballot. They complained they didn’t know who to vote for.
Put yourself in their shoes. Obama v Romney and Rubio. Who are you going to vote for? Or will you vote at all? There is definitely no way to challenge the qualifications of a vice president. Heck we can’t even check the prez’s now.

What I am saying is this, if the few people who do know there is a problem don’t get laws passed in their state legislatures charging SoS to check qualifications and give standing to ordinary citizens, we will eventually someday be doomed."

COMMENT #113 (jdirt):

In reply to this comment:

"Wasn’t the NH hearing pretty much led by Orly?? I blame that on her for not being able to clearly articulate the message. This Hatfield in Georgia seems much, much better". (Comment #110 by 'edge919')

--------------------------------

"Come on edge, you are not being fair. She handed them 85 pages of evidence. Their out was the law only requires us to collect a check and a form. So what the heck we need 15 people to do that for?

Orly is it, like it or not. She is the only attorney in the country willing to file ballot challenges all over the country period.

See if you can find one, much less one who will do it pro bono. See if Hatfield, Van Irion, Donofrio, Apuzzo, Berg, Kreep etc etc will return your calls. And if you try to file one pro se, right in the garbage it will go.

She is our only hope and thats the reality of it. So go easy on her."

[bsteadman]

(2) Particularly Interesting Comments in the Referenced Free Repubic Thread

COMMENT #131 (chrisnj):

"We are all holding our breath.

Cautiously optimistic but chances are it will be derailed -

* something might happen and another pro-obumo judge will replace this one; or

* this judge will declare default judgement; the SOS will determine default judgement is not good enough, obumo was already vetted by DNC, media and voters blah blah...then the challenge drags on until it is too late.

Sad but what can we do when stupid people and congress install obumo and keep him there giving all the power/money/resources he needs to ‘squash’ us?"

COMMENT #143 (battletank):

Excerpt:

"He is not in this litigation as President. He is in this litigation as a CITIZEN. The Notice to Produce specifically calls on HIM to appear before the Judge."