Tweet
Western Journalism: Obama Constitutionally Ineligible To Be President; Dem Birthers Coming!?
Birther Report
1/27/2015
Excerpt:
Western Journalism: Obama Is Constitutionally Ineligible To Be President; Liberal Birthers Coming!?
Will WJ be correct or will the left continue to misrepresent the true meaning of "natural born Citizen"... ?
Tim Powers writes @ Western Journalism:
Great to see more folks with the power of the pen call out the obvious ... Two wrongs don't make a right!
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/01...ism-obama.html
Birther Report
1/27/2015
Excerpt:
Western Journalism: Obama Is Constitutionally Ineligible To Be President; Liberal Birthers Coming!?
Will WJ be correct or will the left continue to misrepresent the true meaning of "natural born Citizen"... ?
Tim Powers writes @ Western Journalism:
2016 Presidential Race- The Next “Crazy Birthers” Will Be Liberal Democrats
The typical American conservative supports the US Constitution as a whole. I know this because I am one of them. Many of us, over the course of the past seven years, have done the research and have determined that Barack Hussein Obama was constitutionally ineligible to be President. We have petitioned Congress with our proof, but it has fallen on deaf ears. Now our country finds itself in the quagmire caused by a regime whose allegiance lies elsewhere, other than the preservation of the United States of America and our way of life. Just as Senator Joe McCarthy was deemed as a crazy man for stating that Communists were infiltrating Hollywood and our institutions of higher learning (which proved to be true by the way), we avid Constitutionalists have been characterized as “crazy birthers.”
So why would we make the same mistake that the Liberal Democrats made back in 2007? Presidential eligibility was set up as a higher standard for a reason. Our Founders wanted to guarantee that the US President would NOT owe any allegiance to a foreign country. Article two, section one of the US Constitution states:
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”
So why would we, a Constitutionally-minded people, allow the mainstream propaganda arm of the Liberal/ Communist Democrat party to push candidates such as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio to the front of a GOP field of contenders when it is abundantly clear through historical documents that neither one of them is Constitutionally eligible to run? My guess would be that if we run them, a new group of Liberal birthers will be born to combat our choice; and with the way that they have loaded up the Federal courts with their kind, we will be left without a candidate who is worth their salt.
We the People CANNOT afford to stoop to the levels that the Democrats did to get Obama elected. Two wrongs doesn’t make it right. Instead, [...] Western Journalism. - http://www.westernjournalism.com/201...Av1L9O6J70g.97
The typical American conservative supports the US Constitution as a whole. I know this because I am one of them. Many of us, over the course of the past seven years, have done the research and have determined that Barack Hussein Obama was constitutionally ineligible to be President. We have petitioned Congress with our proof, but it has fallen on deaf ears. Now our country finds itself in the quagmire caused by a regime whose allegiance lies elsewhere, other than the preservation of the United States of America and our way of life. Just as Senator Joe McCarthy was deemed as a crazy man for stating that Communists were infiltrating Hollywood and our institutions of higher learning (which proved to be true by the way), we avid Constitutionalists have been characterized as “crazy birthers.”
So why would we make the same mistake that the Liberal Democrats made back in 2007? Presidential eligibility was set up as a higher standard for a reason. Our Founders wanted to guarantee that the US President would NOT owe any allegiance to a foreign country. Article two, section one of the US Constitution states:
“No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.”
So why would we, a Constitutionally-minded people, allow the mainstream propaganda arm of the Liberal/ Communist Democrat party to push candidates such as Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio to the front of a GOP field of contenders when it is abundantly clear through historical documents that neither one of them is Constitutionally eligible to run? My guess would be that if we run them, a new group of Liberal birthers will be born to combat our choice; and with the way that they have loaded up the Federal courts with their kind, we will be left without a candidate who is worth their salt.
We the People CANNOT afford to stoop to the levels that the Democrats did to get Obama elected. Two wrongs doesn’t make it right. Instead, [...] Western Journalism. - http://www.westernjournalism.com/201...Av1L9O6J70g.97
Great to see more folks with the power of the pen call out the obvious ... Two wrongs don't make a right!
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/01...ism-obama.html
Comment