Tweet
Breaking Report: Obama Waives Right To Respond To U.S. Supreme Court In Eligibility Case
Birther Report
5/22/2015
Excerpt:
Breaking News: Obama Waives Right to Respond to U.S. Supreme Court in Eligibility Case!
IS HE A FLIGHT RISK?
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015
(May 22, 2015) — In a stunning show of arrogance Barack Hussein Obama waives his right to respond in a case set in the United States Supreme Court surrounding his eligibility and qualification to even be President by another Presidential Candidate claiming damages to his Campaigns in ’08 and ’12 based on inequality and discrimination.
Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) claims his rights to a fair and equal race based upon the standards set forth in the United States Constitution for the Office of the President have been fouled by the Cartel formed by the DNC and and OFA (Organizing for America), which is what Obama’s Campaign Committee has morphed into from its origin. Far from the “Citizen” requirement in the Constitution for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators was a much higher standard for President and Vice President in what was termed the “natural born Citizen” clause. This element hinges upon what Judy calls unequal, unfair, fervent and blatant discrimination of his rights and his person in a Civil Rights contamination he claims in his action to be wholly damaging.
The action filed today (May 21st, 2015) constituted a willful high-mindedness by Obama that the Court will blow the case off, and he didn’t want to bother defending the action that has been brought to the United States Supreme Court for Justice. CRJ’s tenacious fight for the principle and honor of the Office of the President did not start with Obama but actually began first with a Las Vegas, Nevada U.S. District Court case against Sen. John McCain just days before receiving the Republican Nomination. Though Obama was included in the lawsuit as an Emergency Motion was filed, the Judge delayed ruling on the suit until after the election of November 2008, whereupon he ruled it was ‘moot’ because Obama had won and the action had predominantly been filed against McCain.
Another 13 court proceedings have happened spanning West to East, and North and South all over the nation between that case and the one happening right now in the United States Supreme Court, Judy v. Obama 14-9396, which the mainstream media has not sighed a word about to the public yet. That’s why it would come as a big surprise to almost everyone except those paying attention to these news briefs if pictures suddenly emerged of Obama in handcuffs being led to the Court under arrest to prevent his fleeing the country in Air Force One, which could very well happen within the next three weeks!
CRJ says there is going to be a whole lot of people pointing to this “Waiver of right to respond” as an understanding the Court will in no way, shape or form take the case, but Judy says he can prove otherwise with very relevant and current procedure happening in the Court as we speak.
“All you have to do,” he explained, “is look at the cases the Court is actually hearing now and walk them back on the Docket Report to when they were first filed. You don’t even have to go back; just look at the case currently in front of the court or very recently argued.”
Cody cited three cases that indeed were being argued before the United States Supreme Court within the last few months or so. “There is a case called Clyde Reed v. Town of Gilbert, AZ. case number 13-502; Andre Lee Coleman v. Todd Tollefson Case No. 13-333 and Glenn Tibble v. Edison International Case No. 13-550 these cases were in Argument January and February of this year [2015]. They all had quite a bit in common as far as procedure goes, right in line with mine, and their Petition for Writ of Certiori was GRANTED!
“First thing you notice right off the bat about these three case is all of them had just exactly what Obama just filed: “A waiver of the Respondent to Respond,” and all of them had their Writs of Certiori indeed granted. There are a lot of people spreading misinformation out there about what the Court can and can’t do. The next thing people say is, “Well, your case was categorically dismissed by the Lower Court and Twice Dismissed by the Circuit Court in an original petition and a petition for rehearing.” Guess what, Don’t be Fooled? So indeed were these three cases the United States Supreme Court decided to hear.”
“That’s right, look at them!” Judy said, so we did and here’s what we found.
1st Case Docket Report:Case No. 13-502
REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, AZ
9th Circuit
Court Decision -FEB 8
Rehearing: Denied
Oct 21 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2013)
Oct 31 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Town of Gilbert, Arizona, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 19 2013 Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, et al.
Nov 26 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Nov 26 2013 Response Requested . (Due December 26, 2013)
Jul 1 2014 Petition GRANTED.
2nd Case Docket Report: No. 13-1333
Andre Lee Coleman, aka Andre Lee Coleman-Bey, Petitioner v. Todd Tollefson, et al.
6th Circuit
Decision Date: October 23, 2013
Rehearing Denied: January 17, 2014
May 5 2014 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2014)
May 28 2014 Waiver of right of respondents Todd Tollefson, et al. to respond filed.
Jun 4 2014 Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
Jun 18 2014 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Oct 2 2014 Petition GRANTED.
3rd Case Docket Report: No. 13-550
Glenn Tibble, et al., Petitioners v. Edison International, et al
9th Circuit
Decision Date: March 21, 2013
Rehearing Denied: August 1, 2013
Oct 30 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2013)
Nov 15 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Edison International, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 26 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Oct 2 2014 Petition GRANTED (limited to questions..)
Indeed! Everyone of the Cases were denied twice in the Circuit Courts before appearing on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Docket Report, everyone of them had a Waiver of right of respondents to respond filed, and indeed everyone of them were in fact GRANTED, just as Cody had said.
CRJ Continues to Take A Stand for Americans
The next thing Cody pointed out was an interesting question. CRJ continued:
“Out of all three of those cases I’ve mentioned, do any one of them even compare to the fraud that having an illegal candidate running and collecting money from innocent people for a Campaign Office they are not qualified for? How many millions of people and millions of dollars are being collected fraudulently by unqualified Candidates who just think they can get away with it because no one has been granted STANDING by a Court of Law. I ran as a Democrat in 2012 in the Democratic Party standing was not an issue, but the damages were unacknowledged, and that’s what really makes me mad. Its like having someone crash your house and then say there’s nothing wrong with a car in your living room. Its unbelievable!”
“Well, my cases have never been dismissed because of that! My cases have all been like ghost just disappearing with a one or two sentence opinion, or as this case has proven, railed against so hard in an unprecedented candor you actually wonder what the Judge/or Justices have against me personally because of quite frankly a total stake in the heart of Court procedure? It’s unreal when you have two witnesses in Court testifying of something and the Court won’t even hold a hearing on it with Sheriff’s Investigations right in front of the Judge/Justices! What do you do in that instance? The only think you can do is move on to the next Court and fork out another $250,000 of DC Lawyer time and effort expenses.
“At least Obama gets the benefit of talking to the media and telling them what a big pain in the rear end Birthers are. That has got to be somewhat consoling. I haven’t even got that much satisfaction. The Media feels so sorry for him, and they scowl at me for protesting that Big Foot’s Truck just crashed through the front door and wall of my house crashing the floor and ceilings in and look at me as if I shouldn’t be bothered? That’s why I haven’t cared if it took FIFTEEN CASES AND 40 MILLION DOLLARS! That son-of-a-gun has he’s truck parked on top of my house and I want it off and the damages it’s caused the last six years. I don’t care how long he has been sleeping in the White House. He stay there for all I care, just give me my damages and Congress can deal with it after that. If they don’t want to, hey, that’s the Peoples Problem not mine personally any longer. The people want to put up with that I can’t tell them what to do. They haven’t supported me that much monetarily, but the few dozen who have over the years, I’ve sworn to refund their money because I think they at least deserve that as they supported me on the basis of a fair race and that has been violated.”
Read the rest .... - © 2015, The Post & Email. All rights reserved. Source link. - http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/05/...gibility-case/
View the complete article at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/05...-right-to.html
Birther Report
5/22/2015
Excerpt:
Breaking News: Obama Waives Right to Respond to U.S. Supreme Court in Eligibility Case!
IS HE A FLIGHT RISK?
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015
(May 22, 2015) — In a stunning show of arrogance Barack Hussein Obama waives his right to respond in a case set in the United States Supreme Court surrounding his eligibility and qualification to even be President by another Presidential Candidate claiming damages to his Campaigns in ’08 and ’12 based on inequality and discrimination.
Cody Robert Judy (CRJ) claims his rights to a fair and equal race based upon the standards set forth in the United States Constitution for the Office of the President have been fouled by the Cartel formed by the DNC and and OFA (Organizing for America), which is what Obama’s Campaign Committee has morphed into from its origin. Far from the “Citizen” requirement in the Constitution for U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators was a much higher standard for President and Vice President in what was termed the “natural born Citizen” clause. This element hinges upon what Judy calls unequal, unfair, fervent and blatant discrimination of his rights and his person in a Civil Rights contamination he claims in his action to be wholly damaging.
The action filed today (May 21st, 2015) constituted a willful high-mindedness by Obama that the Court will blow the case off, and he didn’t want to bother defending the action that has been brought to the United States Supreme Court for Justice. CRJ’s tenacious fight for the principle and honor of the Office of the President did not start with Obama but actually began first with a Las Vegas, Nevada U.S. District Court case against Sen. John McCain just days before receiving the Republican Nomination. Though Obama was included in the lawsuit as an Emergency Motion was filed, the Judge delayed ruling on the suit until after the election of November 2008, whereupon he ruled it was ‘moot’ because Obama had won and the action had predominantly been filed against McCain.
Another 13 court proceedings have happened spanning West to East, and North and South all over the nation between that case and the one happening right now in the United States Supreme Court, Judy v. Obama 14-9396, which the mainstream media has not sighed a word about to the public yet. That’s why it would come as a big surprise to almost everyone except those paying attention to these news briefs if pictures suddenly emerged of Obama in handcuffs being led to the Court under arrest to prevent his fleeing the country in Air Force One, which could very well happen within the next three weeks!
CRJ says there is going to be a whole lot of people pointing to this “Waiver of right to respond” as an understanding the Court will in no way, shape or form take the case, but Judy says he can prove otherwise with very relevant and current procedure happening in the Court as we speak.
“All you have to do,” he explained, “is look at the cases the Court is actually hearing now and walk them back on the Docket Report to when they were first filed. You don’t even have to go back; just look at the case currently in front of the court or very recently argued.”
Cody cited three cases that indeed were being argued before the United States Supreme Court within the last few months or so. “There is a case called Clyde Reed v. Town of Gilbert, AZ. case number 13-502; Andre Lee Coleman v. Todd Tollefson Case No. 13-333 and Glenn Tibble v. Edison International Case No. 13-550 these cases were in Argument January and February of this year [2015]. They all had quite a bit in common as far as procedure goes, right in line with mine, and their Petition for Writ of Certiori was GRANTED!
“First thing you notice right off the bat about these three case is all of them had just exactly what Obama just filed: “A waiver of the Respondent to Respond,” and all of them had their Writs of Certiori indeed granted. There are a lot of people spreading misinformation out there about what the Court can and can’t do. The next thing people say is, “Well, your case was categorically dismissed by the Lower Court and Twice Dismissed by the Circuit Court in an original petition and a petition for rehearing.” Guess what, Don’t be Fooled? So indeed were these three cases the United States Supreme Court decided to hear.”
“That’s right, look at them!” Judy said, so we did and here’s what we found.
1st Case Docket Report:Case No. 13-502
REED V. TOWN OF GILBERT, AZ
9th Circuit
Court Decision -FEB 8
Rehearing: Denied
Oct 21 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 20, 2013)
Oct 31 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Town of Gilbert, Arizona, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 19 2013 Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Professors Ashutosh Bhagwat, et al.
Nov 26 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Nov 26 2013 Response Requested . (Due December 26, 2013)
Jul 1 2014 Petition GRANTED.
2nd Case Docket Report: No. 13-1333
Andre Lee Coleman, aka Andre Lee Coleman-Bey, Petitioner v. Todd Tollefson, et al.
6th Circuit
Decision Date: October 23, 2013
Rehearing Denied: January 17, 2014
May 5 2014 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 4, 2014)
May 28 2014 Waiver of right of respondents Todd Tollefson, et al. to respond filed.
Jun 4 2014 Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.
Jun 18 2014 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 29, 2014.
Oct 2 2014 Petition GRANTED.
3rd Case Docket Report: No. 13-550
Glenn Tibble, et al., Petitioners v. Edison International, et al
9th Circuit
Decision Date: March 21, 2013
Rehearing Denied: August 1, 2013
Oct 30 2013 Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 2, 2013)
Nov 15 2013 Waiver of right of respondents Edison International, et al. to respond filed.
Nov 26 2013 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 13, 2013.
Oct 2 2014 Petition GRANTED (limited to questions..)
Indeed! Everyone of the Cases were denied twice in the Circuit Courts before appearing on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Docket Report, everyone of them had a Waiver of right of respondents to respond filed, and indeed everyone of them were in fact GRANTED, just as Cody had said.
CRJ Continues to Take A Stand for Americans
The next thing Cody pointed out was an interesting question. CRJ continued:
“Out of all three of those cases I’ve mentioned, do any one of them even compare to the fraud that having an illegal candidate running and collecting money from innocent people for a Campaign Office they are not qualified for? How many millions of people and millions of dollars are being collected fraudulently by unqualified Candidates who just think they can get away with it because no one has been granted STANDING by a Court of Law. I ran as a Democrat in 2012 in the Democratic Party standing was not an issue, but the damages were unacknowledged, and that’s what really makes me mad. Its like having someone crash your house and then say there’s nothing wrong with a car in your living room. Its unbelievable!”
“Well, my cases have never been dismissed because of that! My cases have all been like ghost just disappearing with a one or two sentence opinion, or as this case has proven, railed against so hard in an unprecedented candor you actually wonder what the Judge/or Justices have against me personally because of quite frankly a total stake in the heart of Court procedure? It’s unreal when you have two witnesses in Court testifying of something and the Court won’t even hold a hearing on it with Sheriff’s Investigations right in front of the Judge/Justices! What do you do in that instance? The only think you can do is move on to the next Court and fork out another $250,000 of DC Lawyer time and effort expenses.
“At least Obama gets the benefit of talking to the media and telling them what a big pain in the rear end Birthers are. That has got to be somewhat consoling. I haven’t even got that much satisfaction. The Media feels so sorry for him, and they scowl at me for protesting that Big Foot’s Truck just crashed through the front door and wall of my house crashing the floor and ceilings in and look at me as if I shouldn’t be bothered? That’s why I haven’t cared if it took FIFTEEN CASES AND 40 MILLION DOLLARS! That son-of-a-gun has he’s truck parked on top of my house and I want it off and the damages it’s caused the last six years. I don’t care how long he has been sleeping in the White House. He stay there for all I care, just give me my damages and Congress can deal with it after that. If they don’t want to, hey, that’s the Peoples Problem not mine personally any longer. The people want to put up with that I can’t tell them what to do. They haven’t supported me that much monetarily, but the few dozen who have over the years, I’ve sworn to refund their money because I think they at least deserve that as they supported me on the basis of a fair race and that has been violated.”
Read the rest .... - © 2015, The Post & Email. All rights reserved. Source link. - http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/05/...gibility-case/
View the complete article at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/05...-right-to.html