Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama Article II Ineligibility Case At SCOTUS; Gibbs Admitted Obama Ineligibility

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama Article II Ineligibility Case At SCOTUS; Gibbs Admitted Obama Ineligibility

    Report: Obama Article II Ineligibility Case At Supreme Court; Gibbs Admitted Obama Ineligibility

    Birther Report

    6/14/2015

    Excerpt:

    U.S. Supreme Court Case Highlights a True American Champion – Actions, Not Just Words
    OBAMA ELIGIBILITY CHALLENGER ASKS FOR PRAYERS, SUPPORT IN ADVANCE OF SCOTUS CONFERENCE ON HIS CASE
    by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015


    (Jun. 14, 2015) — As we head into the final stretch of the road before the June 18th Conference at the United States Supreme Court this Thursday, I would like to take the time to thank you for the social support, nice comments, and prayers that are being offered on the behalf of this Campaign and our Record to preserve, protect, and defend you in the Civil Courts of Law. I ask very humbly for your most sincere prayers Thursday and that they include the Justices of the United States Supreme Court. SCOTUS NEWS- Judy v. Obama 14-9396. I’m thinking it was better to be given the June 18th Conference with 177 Cases than the 202 cases scheduled for Conference June 25. My case listed on June 18th is about 111th on the list. https://certpool.com/conferences/2015-06-18 That’s a lot of cases to go through in one day. You can see what a huge task that is for the Justices and their assistants.

    The biggest reason, of course, that Judy v. Obama 14-9396 has been filed is out of a national security concern. Many people think it’s about ‘hate’, including much of the mainstream media. It’s just the opposite: it’s about love and protecting you, the Americans, when no other politician would. They have all forsaken you; not one candidate for President of the United States has taken a bi-partisan stand against those who are illegal and seek the Presidency in an illegal usurpation.

    They all have succumbed to Party over Principle, and Power over the People instead of in service of the People. It may be the most difficult thing to explain to you and have you understand if you don’t already get it. There is no doubt in my mind that as history unfolds, you will gain an understanding of exactly how TRUE these words are. Many see the threat of radical Jihadists as much more than the “JV Team” that Obama called them. When you understand the implications of our military funding and training the Jihadist Veracity (JV Team), over the last few years, you understand the implications of our national security, and it’s then impossible not to recognize the ‘natural born Citizen’ clause, which Obama is in violation of, within our Constitution’s Borders. Does Pamela Geller support the only Candidate for President willing to stand up on a bi-partisan platform against those who are wanting to subvert it? I don’t think she does.

    Pamela is either too preoccupied with coloring pictures, or she doesn’t have a brain in her head not to come out and support a Candidate willing to pull the line on Obama’s hamstring of ineligibility to stop funding an Islamic Caliphate. It’s her birthday today. I hate to be too hard on her, but she’s got a lot of headlines, and without support in the right direction, motives get called into question very easily. It’s the nature of political stunts like she’s pulling. Of course she can color pictures; we all know that it’s a First Amendment right that has the full protections of the United States Constitution, but what is the United States Constitution without anyone ‘preserving’, ‘protecting’, and ‘defending’ it? It amounts to words on a piece of paper without enforcement.

    In fact, not supporting me for President in her actions is like admitting you really don’t want to stop radical jihadists, and you hope to continue their funding, territory incursion, beheadings, kidnapping and general mayhem in the effort to spread their terror to Americans through U.S. grants and funding. These proxy take-overs were just means to get our military arsenal into the hands of radical jihadists. That’s no longer conspiracy, even to the mainstream press. These guys were not rich enough to buy BB guns, and now over the last six years they have some of the most sophisticated weapons in the world in their possession? How did that happen on Obama’s watch?

    If you haven’t asked yourself how the radical jihadists are getting their funding for the weapons caches and military hardware, you just need to take a look at what we are doing in Syria arming ‘rebels’, what we did in Libya arming ‘rebels’, what we did in Iraq arming ‘rebels’. We have a billion dollars involved in training Syrians right now which Democrats are just starting to question. I’ve written numerous posts on this, and I encourage people, if they have a subject wanting clarification, to simply type in the words on the search bar of my Blog. That will bring up posts I have addressed on the issues.

    AMERICAN MEDIA GOT IT WRONG

    Let’s see what a billion dollars would get us? That gives everyone in the United States basically a Happy Meal at McDonald’s, who, by the way, just hired Obama’s former Press Secretary Robert Gibbs as a spokesman. Remember Robert Gibbs told the truth to the media and said Obama was a Citizen of the United States of America. They were either so uneducated on the Constitution or they sought funding for radical jihadists themselves buying cover for Obama. “Citizen” isn’t the qualification for the Office of the President. It’s the qualification for the Office of a U.S. Senator and a U.S. Representative. The President’s Office requires a ‘natural born Citizen‘ – [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents]. Here is the ‘play on words’ Gibbs gave the press in admitting Obama is a Citizen of the U.S. In speaking about the Office of the President’s qualifications, he admits candidly that Obama is not qualified because he doesn’t use the Constitution’s Qualifications of ‘natural born Citizen’. Again, being ‘born’ in the U.S. and being ‘naturalized’ by the birth, like an anchor baby is or under the same circumstances as U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, does not qualify you for the Office of the President. Neither does having one American parent like Cruz or Obama.

    Read the rest here. - © 2015, The Post & Email. All rights reserved. Source link.
    - http://www.thepostemail.com/2015/06/...ot-just-words/

    View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

    http://www.birtherreport.com/2015/06...bility_14.html
    B. Steadman
Working...
X