Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GUNWALKER: Obama evokes memories of Watergate by invoking executive privilege

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • GUNWALKER: Obama evokes memories of Watergate by invoking executive privilege

    Obama evokes memories of Watergate by invoking executive privilege

    Examiner

    Anthony Martin, Conservative Examiner
    6/20/2012

    Excerpt:

    "In a move that evokes memories of the Watergate scandal of 1974, President Obama today invoked executive privilege in the Fast and Furious scandal, placing off limits the subpoenaed documents the Justice Department had been ordered to submit to Congress.

    The move gives at least some legal protection to Attorney General Eric Holder in his ongoing dispute with Congress over the documents. But executive privilege will not protect him from a citation of contempt of Congress or possible criminal charges.

    Obama's move to invoke executive privilege is eerily reminiscent of the conflict between Congress and the Executive Branch during the Watergate scandal that destroyed the presidency of Richard M. Nixon.
    Advertisement

    CBS News reporter Dan Rather catapulted the Watergate scandal to the singular focus of the media when he quoted Sen. Howard Baker, who asked, "What did the president know and when did he know it?" Perhaps it is now time for the media to ask the same thing of Obama.

    What did President Obama know and when did he know it?

    During the Watergate hearings before Congress another controversial attorney general, John Mitchell, was also under the gun to provide documentation of facts concerning the burglary of the Democratic headquarters at the Watergate Hotel and its subsequent cover up.

    Nixon eventually invoked executive privilege to prevent Congress from obtaining information concerning the cover up in particular, which involved most of the key officials of his administration, including Mitchell and top presidential advisers John Ehrlickman, H.R. Haldeman, Jeb Magruder, Charles Colson, and John Dean, among others.

    Mitchell was later sentenced to prison in 1977 and served 18 months. Other Watergate figures also served jail time including Ehrlickman, Haldeman, Magruder, Colson, and Dean.

    Nixon was forced to resign under the threat of impending impeachment hearings, after it became clear that he would not have the votes to survive impeachment when Sen. Barry Goldwater, R-Ariz., stated that he could no longer support Nixon due to his numerous "lies."

    So far Democrats in Congress have been solid in their support for Obama and Holder in the Fast and Furious scandal. That could easily change.

    Early in the Watergate scandal Republicans quickly came to the defense of Nixon and formed an effective minority block in Congress against the Democratic majority, whom they portrayed as going on a witch hunt.

    But as the hearings moved forward and it became clear that laws were broken and Nixon had lied to cover them up, one by one Republicans began to lose faith. And when Nixon lost the support of Goldwater, who perhaps was the most powerful Republican senator at the time, the entire administration came unraveled.

    Democrats who support Obama may feel they have political cover at present to attempt to protect the president. But even in this highly partisan political atmosphere Democrats in Congress know that they are potentially vulnerable in this volatile election year which has all of the markings of the most important election in over 100 years."

    ....................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://www.examiner.com/article/obam...ive-privilege?
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    GOP Open to Talks Before Holder Contempt Vote

    Newsmax

    6/21/2012

    Excerpt:

    "House Republican officials say they're willing to negotiate an end to a potential constitutional confrontation in a document dispute, but only if the Obama administration turns over more emails and memos related to the flawed Fast and Furious gun-tracking operation.

    The dispute got a little nastier Wednesday. A House committee voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt, the Obama administration invoked a legal stance that could prevent turning over the documents and the confrontation was elevated to the White House and the top House GOP leadership.

    House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor said the House would vote next week on accepting the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's contempt of Congress vote.

    Committee officials who would conduct any negotiations in the coming days for Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa said they're looking for at least some additional documents on Fast and Furious — plus some "signs of good faith."

    The latter could include substantive responses to future committee requests for documents, reforming the approval process for wiretap applications, acknowledging mistakes in misleading Congress about Fast and Furious, taking whistle-blowers seriously and producing a log of documents to be turned over, according to the officials, who spoke only on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the issue by name.

    The administration, for its part, would have to abandon the president's assertion of executive privilege — a legal position that attempts to protect internal executive branch documents from disclosure. If the administration maintains that stance, it could lead to court fights that could take years to resolve.

    The last Cabinet member to be cited by a congressional committee for contempt was Attorney General Janet Reno in President Bill Clinton's administration. That was never brought to a follow-up vote in the full House.

    Technically, if the full House approves the Holder contempt citation, there could be a federal criminal case against him, but history strongly suggests the matter won't get that far.

    Democrats contended that the 23-17 party-line contempt vote Wednesday was just political theater. The committee's top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, called the vote "an extreme, virtually unprecedented action based on election-year politics rather than fact."

    Democrats noted that during the committee's 1 1/2-year-long investigation, the Justice Department has turned over 7,600 documents about the conduct of the Fast and Furious operation.

    While Boehner and Cantor would make the final decision on postponing a vote, aides to the speaker and Issa said the chairman and his staff would conduct any upcoming negotiations — as they have been doing throughout the year.

    The Issa aides believe that a few hundred pages of documents may satisfy them, providing that those records tell the story of how the Justice Department came to understand that it gave Congress false information on Feb. 4, 2011. The department said then that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives made every effort to interdict weapons moving from Arizona to Mexico."

    ....................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/GOP...6/21/id/442972
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      Executive privilege poses tricky situation for Obama

      The Washington Post

      David Nakamura
      6/20/2012

      Excerpt:

      "President Obama’s decision Wednesday to assert executive privilege to shield his attorney general and the Justice Department from congressional investigators reignited a long-running Washington debate over the limits of White House power in which Obama has argued both sides.

      In 2007, Obama, then a senator with higher ambitions, chided President George W. Bush for employing his executive authority to block then-senior White House adviser Karl Rove from testifying before Congress in a scandal involving the firing of nine U.S. attorneys.

      Speaking to CNN host Larry King, Obama declared that the Bush administration had a tendency to “hide behind executive privilege every time there’s something a little shaky that’s taking place.”

      Obama urged Bush to consider “coming clean,” adding that “the American people deserve to know what was going on there.”

      On Wednesday, his role had changed, but the debate was the same: Republican were asking what exactly Obama was trying to hide by invoking his right to executive privilege for the first time. The administration is refusing to turn over documents related to the Justice Department’s “Fast and Furious” operation, which involved the flow of illegal guns to Mexico. A House committee on Wednesday voted to find Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt of Congress for failing to turn over the documents.

      The answers to his critics’ questions could have broad implications for Obama five months before voters decide whether to grant him a second term. The expected protracted legal dispute has the potential to embarrass and distract the White House during the heart of the reelection campaign. Obama’s assertion of privilege quickly became fodder for his political opponents, who have latched onto the Fast and Furious scandal to accuse the president of trying to avoid congressional scrutiny.

      Sen. Charles E. Grassley (Iowa), a senior Republican on the Judiciary Committee, sent a letter to Obama on Wednesday asking for more detail on the exact scope of the privilege that Obama invoked.

      Administration officials dismissed suggestions that the president's action contradicted the position Obama held as a presidential candidate in 2007. They noted the administration already has handed over 7,600 documents to Congress and Holder has testified nine times.

      The documents in dispute are “deliberative process” memos that have traditionally been protected by Democratic and Republican administrations so that the White House staff can freely discuss sensitive matters without being influenced by the fear that their internal debates will be made public, administration officials said.

      White House spokesman Eric Schultz noted that Obama has shown greater reluctance to use executive privilege than his two immediate predecessors. Bush invoked the power six times and Bill Clinton 14, according to the Congressional Research Service.

      But Mark Rozell, a public policy professor at George Mason University who has testified before Congress on executive privilege, said the question is not how many times the power is invoked but whether there is a legal justification.

      The Constitution does not mention executive privilege, said Rozell, who noted that courts have typically ruled that it applies in cases of vital national security interests.

      That might be the legal definition, but the political calculus for the White House is whether what Obama is seeking to keep private is more damaging to him than failing to publicly disclose the documents.

      “Every time a president claims executive privilege, it brings up memories of President Nixon’s abuses of that doctrine,” Rozell said."

      ..........................................

      View the complete article at:

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...RrV_story.html
      B. Steadman

      Comment


      • #4
        Holder-Obama Guilt in Fast & Furious Now Confirmed -- Gulag Bound, Sher Zieve

        BREAKING: Holder-Obama Guilt in Fast & Furious Now Confirmed

        Gulag Bound

        Sher Zieve
        6/20/2012

        Excerpt:

        "After refusing on Tuesday to provide Darrell Issa with the promised winnowed-down-by-Boehner-to-1,300 requested emails, Holder asked Obama Wednesday to approve Executive Privilege to end his provision to Congress of any and all additional materials that could harm him and Obama. Suffice it to say, Obama immediately signed off on it and issued yet another infamous ObamaFiat. Judge Andrew Napolitano advised that this action by Obama is illegal, as Executive Privilege applies only to Presidential correspondences.

        With this action, it is now clear to anyone with working eyes, ears and minds that the Obama Syndicate is in full lock-down and cover-up mode. We already know that this was sanctioned by both Holder and Obama from a 24 March 2009 video (see article) of Deputy Attorney General David Ogden. Why was this never cited by the Issa committee? Fast & Furious was developed specifically to end the 2nd Amendment and–as did Adolph Hitler in WWII–confiscate Constitutionally allowed gun ownership.

        Clearer evidence of a completely unconstitutional Obama government and its quickly developing Police State are now evident to the entire world. Only the US media and Obama sycophants refuse to acknowledge the truth."

        .................................................. ..

        View the complete article, including video, at:

        http://gulagbound.com/31243/breaking.../#.T-M2UcXkaSo
        B. Steadman

        Comment


        • #5
          Breaking: Issa’s House committee votes to hold Holder in contempt; Update: Obama’s compounding the tragedy, says Brian Terry’s family

          Hot Air

          Allahpundit
          6/20/2012

          Excerpt:

          "Next stop: The House floor for a vote by the full chamber. The Hill seems unsure about how many GOP votes it’ll get, but c’mon. Even recalcitrant Republicans who think a court battle with The One is a needless distraction have no choice but to go to the mat for Issa now that O’s pulled his power play with executive privilege.

          The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, led by Republican Chairman Darrell Issa (Calif.), approved a resolution along party lines to place Holder in contempt after battling him for months over access to internal agency documents about the gun-tracking operation Fast and Furious…

          Even with 242 Republicans in the House majority, it remains unclear whether the contempt measure would have the backing of the full caucus. Many GOP members have resisted action on the Fast and Furious issue out of a desire to keep the 2012 election focus on the economy and jobs…

          If the measure against Holder passes the House, it would be sent to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, who would convene a grand jury that would decide whether to indict Holder. The U.S. Attorney’s office would be the designated prosecutor for the committee if Holder were to be indicted. The attorney general would face a maximum sentence of one year in prison if convicted by a jury.

          Boehner just announced that the House will vote next week — unless, of course, O decides to play ball and turn over the documents Issa requested. Which, given that this is now a partisan death struggle in the middle of a campaign, I’m guessing he won’t do. What happens if the House votes yes? Three possibilities, according to CQ. One: The House could, er, have Holder arrested. Doubtful. Two, as noted in the Hill piece: Boehner and Issa could ask the DOJ to prosecute Holder. Since Holder runs the DOJ, let’s call that one doubtful too. Three: The House could file a civil lawsuit against Holder demanding the documents, at which point he and O would assert executive privilege and off we’d go to federal court for a constitutional battle over separation of powers. I would guess that you’ll see some sort of deal at that point since both sides will be leery of an adverse outcome. Obama doesn’t want a court ruling dropped on him in the last few months before the election compelling him to turn over damaging documents and the GOP doesn’t want to hand O a talking point about that damned obstructionist do-nothing Republican Congress sabotaging his progressive gunrunning scheme, etc, especially while Romney’s trying to get a word in edgewise about the misery of Obamanomics.

          Multiple updates coming. Stand by."

          .........................

          View the complete article at:

          http://hotair.com/archives/2012/06/2...r-in-contempt/
          B. Steadman

          Comment


          • #6
            Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Those Fast and Furious Documents Must be Dynamite (Obama Has Painted Himself Into a Corner)', which was started 6/20/2012 by 'lbryce'

            The thread references a 6/20/2012 Powerline article written by Paul Mirengoff

            View the complete Free Republic thread at:

            http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2897612/posts
            B. Steadman

            Comment

            Working...
            X