Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama Attempts to Intimidate Opposition Atty. in RICO Case to Be Heard Friday in MS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama Attempts to Intimidate Opposition Atty. in RICO Case to Be Heard Friday in MS

    Obama Attempts to Intimidate Opposition Attorney in RICO Case to Be Heard Friday in MS

    Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012

    Pamela Barnett
    11/15/2012

    Excerpt:

    Barack Obama’s attorneys attempted to intimidate an attorney in a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) case regarding Obama’s forged Hawaii birth certificate and forged Selective Service Registration (Draft Card), and Obama’s use of a social security number never assigned to him according to federal database (E-Verify). See (links given in original article). The next hearing on this case is Friday, Nov. 16, 1 p.m., at the federal court house at 245 W. Capitol St. in Jackson, MS, and is open to the public.

    Scott Tepper, Esq, attorney for Obama, sent an email threat to sanction Orly Taitz, Esq., plaintiff representing herself in the federal RICO case, because she filed an affidavit that shows that the “Obama birth certificate” that Tepper filed with the court was further altered from the original forgery at whitehouse.gov. This case was filed in the Southern District of Mississippi the Honorable Henry Wingate, a Ronald Regean appointee, now presiding.

    From pleading filed by Taitz -

    Tepper e-mailed Taitz and other plaintiffs a proposed settlement offer, where he wanted Taitz not to make any “defamatory remarks” about defendants and their attorneys and pay $25,000 attorneys’ fees to Attorney Begley or otherwise defendants will go after Plaintiffs seeking a much higher amount. Considering the fact that neither Taitz nor any of the Plaintiffs have stated anything defamatory, that all of their statements were true statements based on sworn affidavits and neither have done anything frivolous to warrant any award of fees, Taitz believes that this “offer” was a form of intimidation, particularly an intimidation of coplaintiffs and desire to silence Taitz and co-plaintiff’s regarding modifications in the image of the alleged birth certificate, which was sent by Tepper to the director of Health Loretta Fuddy. Further Tepper and Begley engaged in a campaign of harassment and intimidation, appeared on the radio, specifically RCR blogtalk radio, where they threatened that they will be going after the house of Taitz. This was done with a clear desire to intimidate and harass not only Taitz, but her whole family, her husband and her 3 children.

    .........................................


    View the complete article at:

    http://obamaballotchallenge.com/obam...d-friday-in-ms
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
    Orly Taitz, Esq.

    11/16/2012

    My luggage with all my files, docs and clothes is still missing. United stated that the suitcase left the airport and was delivered to a company Bagsinc, I went on their site, it shows that the luggage is awaiting assignment to driver since yesterday

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363162

    My luggage is missing. Will have to appear in court in jeans. I don’t have my papers. Will do the best I can with what I have

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363124

    I am in MS. Yesterday there was a copter failure which grounded all United flights for an hour and I nearly didn’t make it.

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363122
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      5 hour marathon hearing against 5 lawyers. No decision yet. Judge Wingate ordered additional briefing on RICO and other issues

      Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

      Orly Taitz, Esq.
      11/16/2012

      Excerpt:

      It was a very long day and a very long hearing.

      1. At the hearing Obama’s attorney Scott Tepper started with very arrogant remarks. He called all of my experts buffoons (It seems he considers Sheriff Arpaio, investigator Zullo, officer Sampson and everybody else buffoons).

      Judge Wingate told him right away to stop this behavior and this language.

      All 5 attorneys objected to me providing any evidence. I stated that they opened the door by stating that my whole case was conjectural.

      Judge Wingate told them: why shouldn’t she provide evidence when you opened the door by claiming that it was all conjectural? So Onaka’s and Fuddy’s attorney, Mr. Dukes stated that he withdraws the objection.

      One of the issues that I brought was the fact that I am planning to sue the electoral college and seek DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF for electoral college to be enjoined from casting votes for Obama due to fraud and use of fraudulently obtained and forged IDs.

      I brought the oral motion asking Judge Wingate to give me a leave of court to file a second amended complaint and bring the electoral college as an additional defendant. As far as I know it was never done in the U.S. history, nobody filed a legal actions against the electoral college, but then again nobody got into position of being on the verge of certification while using forged IDs. I will need help in research as to how I serve the electoral college.

      He took it under advisement and said that he will have an answer after the additional briefing. I have one week to brief several issues. My supporters can help me with research:

      1. Judge Wingate wants a total of 3-5 pages. He wants short 1 sentence statements with names of all the people involved in this RICO to put Obama on the ballot with forged IDs

      .................................................. ..

      View the complete post at:

      http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363186
      B. Steadman

      Comment

      Working...
      X