Announcement

**bsteadman** · 11-21-2012, 02:47 PM

5 hour marathon hearing against 5 lawyers. No decision yet. Judge Wingate ordered additional briefing on RICO and other issues

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Orly Taitz, Esq.
11/16/2012

Excerpt:

It was a very long day and a very long hearing.

1. At the hearing Obama’s attorney Scott Tepper started with very arrogant remarks. He called all of my experts buffoons (It seems he considers Sheriff Arpaio, investigator Zullo, officer Sampson and everybody else buffoons).

Judge Wingate told him right away to stop this behavior and this language.

All 5 attorneys objected to me providing any evidence. I stated that they opened the door by stating that my whole case was conjectural.

Judge Wingate told them: why shouldn’t she provide evidence when you opened the door by claiming that it was all conjectural? So Onaka’s and Fuddy’s attorney, Mr. Dukes stated that he withdraws the objection.

One of the issues that I brought was the fact that I am planning to sue the electoral college and seek DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF for electoral college to be enjoined from casting votes for Obama due to fraud and use of fraudulently obtained and forged IDs.

I brought the oral motion asking Judge Wingate to give me a leave of court to file a second amended complaint and bring the electoral college as an additional defendant. As far as I know it was never done in the U.S. history, nobody filed a legal actions against the electoral college, but then again nobody got into position of being on the verge of certification while using forged IDs. I will need help in research as to how I serve the electoral college.

He took it under advisement and said that he will have an answer after the additional briefing. I have one week to brief several issues. My supporters can help me with research:

1. Judge Wingate wants a total of 3-5 pages. He wants short 1 sentence statements with names of all the people involved in this RICO to put Obama on the ballot with forged IDs

2. He wants the list of all predicate facts (meaning underlying crimes, such as forgery, fraud, conspiracy to commit forgery and fraud).

He wants briefing on statutes and precedents.

3. He wants all the statutes and precedents on whether the Secretary of State can de-certify, invalidate votes/results of election. He wants all precedents/statutes, whether he can issue declaratory/injunctive relief in invalidating votes/elections

4. He wants a brief on whether Onaka/Fuddy can be part of RICO, whether they can have mens rea/meaning malicious intent in light of the fact that they are state employees. Dukes stated that they are just state employees doing their job, they cannot form a malicious intent.
................................

View the complete post at:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363186

Announcement

Mississippi: Orly Taitz Obama Case Closer to Wrapping Up -- Birther Headlines

Mississippi: Orly Taitz Obama Case Closer to Wrapping Up -- Birther Headlines

Comment