Tweet
Supplemental brief and exhibits sent to Judge Wingate in MS
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Orly Taitz, Esq.
11/24/2012
Excerpt:
MS supplemental brief
http://www.scribd.com/doc/114328775/...lemental-Brief
Docx version of the brief without the exhibits
PER ORDER OF THE COURT PLAINTIFF SUBMITS THIS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
I. PRECEDENT ON STAYING CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION
1. Originally this case was filed under MS code 23-15-961, later 23-15-963. Originally defense stated that the case was filed 1 day late, however above statutes do not specify calendar days or business days and whether mail box rule apply. MS paralegal Sandra Inman provided an affidavit Exhibit 2 that she called the clerk of the court and was instructed that statute specified business days, which explains the discrepancy. Additionally Defense in their motion to dismiss claimed that the case was filed too early, as Obama was not nominated yet. He has been nominated now and the case is ripe for adjudication. In 2010 U.S. District Court Judge Ralph R. Beistline ordered a STAY of CERTIFICATION of ELECTION RESULTS by the Secretary of State of Alaska of the results of the election of the U.S. senator Lisa Murkowski pending resolution of constitutional violation challenges in a legal action Miller v Campbell 10-cv-00252 -RRB USDC of Alaska. After constitutional challenges were resolved, the stay was lifted. Based on this precedent, in case at hand a STAY in certification of election results by the Secretary of State and a STAY in presenting the Certificate of Ascertainment to the Electors can be issued
.............................................
View the complete post at:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363599
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Orly Taitz, Esq.
11/24/2012
Excerpt:
MS supplemental brief
http://www.scribd.com/doc/114328775/...lemental-Brief
Docx version of the brief without the exhibits
PER ORDER OF THE COURT PLAINTIFF SUBMITS THIS SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
I. PRECEDENT ON STAYING CERTIFICATION OF ELECTION
1. Originally this case was filed under MS code 23-15-961, later 23-15-963. Originally defense stated that the case was filed 1 day late, however above statutes do not specify calendar days or business days and whether mail box rule apply. MS paralegal Sandra Inman provided an affidavit Exhibit 2 that she called the clerk of the court and was instructed that statute specified business days, which explains the discrepancy. Additionally Defense in their motion to dismiss claimed that the case was filed too early, as Obama was not nominated yet. He has been nominated now and the case is ripe for adjudication. In 2010 U.S. District Court Judge Ralph R. Beistline ordered a STAY of CERTIFICATION of ELECTION RESULTS by the Secretary of State of Alaska of the results of the election of the U.S. senator Lisa Murkowski pending resolution of constitutional violation challenges in a legal action Miller v Campbell 10-cv-00252 -RRB USDC of Alaska. After constitutional challenges were resolved, the stay was lifted. Based on this precedent, in case at hand a STAY in certification of election results by the Secretary of State and a STAY in presenting the Certificate of Ascertainment to the Electors can be issued
.............................................
View the complete post at:
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=363599