Tweet
No Recusals: U.S. Supreme Court Denied Without Comment Obama Eligibility Challenge
Birther Report
2/19/2013
Excerpt:
The U.S. Supreme Court in typical fashion denied without comment Dr. Orly Taitz's application for stay for the California electoral challenge Noonan v Bowen. Dr. Taitz sought to strip California's electoral votes from Barack Obama based on his Article II ineligibility, his forged birth certificate, his forged Selective Service, and his Connecticut Social Security Number. Included were Affidavits from DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman and Debt Collector Albert Hendershot attesting to Obama's identity fraud.
It is reported that the U.S. Supreme Court Law Clerks did not even forward the pleadings to Five of the justices.
And as usual SCOTUS Squatters Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves. No conflicts of interest there, right?
FROM PAGE ONE OF THE SCOTUS ORDER LIST:
This is how it would read if they actually recused themselves:
Justice Sotomayor/Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Check back later for updates...
COMPLETE SCOTUS ORDER LIST BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/126169520
PLEADINGS IN QUESTION BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124806553
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...lity-case.html
Birther Report
2/19/2013
Excerpt:
The U.S. Supreme Court in typical fashion denied without comment Dr. Orly Taitz's application for stay for the California electoral challenge Noonan v Bowen. Dr. Taitz sought to strip California's electoral votes from Barack Obama based on his Article II ineligibility, his forged birth certificate, his forged Selective Service, and his Connecticut Social Security Number. Included were Affidavits from DHS Special Agent Stephen Coffman and Debt Collector Albert Hendershot attesting to Obama's identity fraud.
It is reported that the U.S. Supreme Court Law Clerks did not even forward the pleadings to Five of the justices.
And as usual SCOTUS Squatters Sotomayor and Kagan did not recuse themselves. No conflicts of interest there, right?
FROM PAGE ONE OF THE SCOTUS ORDER LIST:
12A606 NOONAN, EDWARD, ET AL. V. BOWEN, CA SEC. OF STATE
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied.
The applications for stay addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court are denied.
This is how it would read if they actually recused themselves:
Justice Sotomayor/Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Check back later for updates...
COMPLETE SCOTUS ORDER LIST BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/126169520
PLEADINGS IN QUESTION BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/124806553
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...lity-case.html