Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clue #2: Obama Apparently Given Stig Waidelich’s BC# -- Butterdezillion's Blog

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Clue #2: Obama Apparently Given Stig Waidelich’s BC# -- Butterdezillion's Blog

    Clue #2: Obama Apparently Given Stig Waidelich’s BC#

    Butterdezillion's Blog

    Butterdezillion
    3/24/2013

    Excerpt:

    Clue Number Two

    Clue #2: Four of the August 1961 BC#’s that the HDOH has disclosed were changed BY THE HDOH from their original 1961 owners – the 3 records with the red flags, and the short-form BC of Stig Waidelich.

    SUMMARY: Stig Waidelich’s computer-generated COLB has a BC# that requires a 12,400% variance from the average birth rate within a 2.5-hour period. It is obviously falsified. So not only do we have paper records (1960-64 birth index, the Ah Nee and Obama BC’s, and the Sunahara death certificate) being falsified by the HDOH, but we have the BC# in the computer system itself being falsified. And all these falsified certificates claimed BC#’s that could not have been on those BC’s in 1961. Stig Waidelich is almost certainly the original owner of the BC# that the HDOH has verified as currently belonging to Obama.

    In the next installment we will look at the only circumstance in which a new BC# can lawfully be assigned to a person. That will be the key that opens the door on what the HDOH has done, when, and why. Everything we’ve seen makes sense when we realize how the HDOH could legally try to justify giving Obama the BC# that belonged to Stig Waidelich.


    View the complete post at:

    http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com...waidelichs-bc/
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Clue Number Two: The HDOH Gave Obama the BC# for Stig Waidelich', which was started 3/24/2013 by 'butterdezillion'

    The thread references a 3/24/2013 post on Butterdezillion's Blog - http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com...waidelichs-bc/

    View the complete Free Republic thread at:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../3000349/posts

    Virginia Sunahara's death certificate showed us that somebody at the HDOH is ordering vital records to be falsified, and a subordinate is resisting by putting in deliberate red flags which seem to point to the BC#'s as fabricated.

    Having seen from 1960 CDC documents the order in which Hawaii BC's were numbered, and based on concurring testimony from Oahu's local registrar in 1961, we now know that at least 4 August 1961 BC#'s have been altered by the HDOH. The BC# that Obama has now originally belonged to the 3rd Honolulu birth after Gretchen Nordyke - which was almost certainly Stig Waidelich. The BC# the HDOH has for Stig Waidelich right now demands a 12,400% increase in birth rates for that 2.5-hour period between Gretchen Nordyke's birth and his.

    I will copy my actual blog post documenting this, in the first comment so the HTML transfers.
    Last edited by bsteadman; 03-25-2013, 07:57 PM.
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      The following is COMMENT #2 by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

      Clue #2: Stig Waidelich’s BC# Clearly Altered, Almost Certainly Given to Obama

      In the first installment (at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpre...-red-flags.pdf ), we saw from the Sunahara death certificate that the document was not only forged at the HDOH, but somebody there deliberately put in red flags to make it clear that it was a forgery. Similar red flags were noted in the Ah Nee and Obama long-form birth certificates. Why were all those records falsified? The red flags showed up near or on the BC#’s, which points us to our next clue:

      Clue #2: Four of the August 1961 BC#’s that the HDOH has disclosed were changed BY THE HDOH from their original 1961 owners – the 3 records with the red flags, and the short-form BC of Stig Waidelich.

      First some essential background on how the BC’s were numbered. The documentation for this (and additional details) can be seen at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpre...ng-system1.pdf .

      Each month the local registrars kept the BC’s for births from each of the CDC’s Hawaii geographic areas in their own region/batch in chronological order according to the time of birth. On the 4th of the month the outlying islands mailed all the BC’s in their office to the state registrar. When those BC’s were received at the state registrar’s office, all the state’s BC’s for that month were placed in this order, numbered consecutively, and microfilmed for the CDC in BC# order with a cover sheet (“target”) between the different regions:

      1. Hilo, in chronological order
      2. The remainder of Hawaii County, in chronological order
      3. Honolulu, in chronological order
      4. The remainder of Honolulu County, in chronological order
      5. Kalawao County, in chronological order
      6. Kauai County, in chronological order
      7. Maui, in chronological order

      So all the Honolulu births for August of 1961 were numbered in chronological order. After them come the BC’s for the rest of Oahu, numbered chronologically.

      We have apparently-HDOH-certified records showing the BC#’s for 5 children born at Kapiolani Hospital in Aug of 1961. But of those 5 people, only twins Susan and Gretchen Nordyke are in chronological order (Below, I will explain why Waidelich’s BC# cannot be in chronological order).

      Here are the HDOH’s disclosed Kapiolani births in chronological order, with the BC#’s for comparison:

      Name DOB time of birth BC# Notes

      Barack Obama Aug 4 10641 Blatant signs of forgery
      Susan Nordyke Aug 5 2:12pm 10637
      Gretchen Nordyke Aug 5 2:17pm 10638
      Stig Waidelich Aug 5 4:47pm 10920 Computer printout only
      Johanna Ah Nee Aug 23 9995 Blatant signs of forgery

      Stig Waidelich’s BC# is the most blatant anomaly. (See Exhibit A). He was born at the same hospital as Gretchen Nordyke, 2.5 hours later. For Waidelich’s BC# to be in chronological order, there would’ve had to be 281 babies born in Honolulu in the 2.5 hours between Gretchen’s birth and his - but the city of Honolulu averaged 22 births/DAY in Aug of 1961. (281 babies within 2.5 hours or 112 babies/hour, compared to the average rate of .9 babies/hour, is 124 times the average rate.) So babies would have had to be born at 124 TIMES the normal rate (12,400% rate increase), just during those 2.5 hours. Didn’t happen. Waidelich’s BC# is a total fabrication

      In addition, we know that Virginia Sunahara was born at Wahiawa Hospital, which is outside of Honolulu. She was born on Aug 4th and so her BC# should be 4 days into the non-Honolulu Oahu births. According to the CDC’s statistics (as analyzed by me using the Nordyke BC#’s as the starting point at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpre...n-analysis.pdf ), the BC#’s in August should have fallen somewhere around these ranges:

      Honolulu births 10,539 through 11,222 (22/day)
      Other Oahu births 11,223 through 11,781 (18/day)
      Other islands 11,782 through 12,001 (7/day)

      Four days into August at a rate of 18 births/day means Sunahara’s BC# should have been somewhere from 54-72 later than the first “other Oahu” BC#. So somewhere between 11277 and 11295. But the handwritten number on the death certificate (which had 3 red flags deliberately placed in that line) was 11,080. That BC# is off by about 200 and should belong to somebody born in Honolulu around Aug 25th. Ah Nee, whose BC# from the HDOH had overlapping digits (showing that the BC# was fabricated at the HDOH) was born in Honolulu on Aug 23.

      Based on how the numbers fall, it appears that:

      1. Obama was given the BC# that originally belonged to Stig Waidelich. (Waidelich was born about 2.5 hours after Gretchen Nordyke, and since the Honolulu rate was almost 1 child/hour, that could easily have made Waidelich the 3rd birth after Gretchen, which means that Waidelich originally had the 10641 BC# that Obama now has).

      2. Stig Waidelich was given the BC# that originally belonged to Ray Piiohla, Jr (an infant born on Aug 20 who died at 2 days of age)

      3. Virginia Sunahara was given the BC# that originally belonged to Johanna Ah Nee. (The timeline regarding the funny business with her record will be understood as we analyze the clues.)

      4. Johanna Ah Nee was given the BC# that originally belonged to an infant who was born on Oahu but outside Honolulu around July 20th.

      Obviously, because this analysis is based on statistics that presume a steady rate of births, the numbers may stray a little from the estimated ranges, but not a lot. Waidelich’s BC# in particular is problematic (with a 12,400% variance from the average birth rate within a 2.5-hour period). Yet that was the one that the HDOH and CNN arranged to showcase right before Obama’s forged long-form was released. It’s almost as if they wanted to put a LOT of distance between Obama’s BC# and the person who originally had that BC#.

      At this point, no August 1961 vital record disclosed by the current HDOH is credible. They are falsifying and fabricating documents at will. The only credible sources for what really existed in 1961 are the original microfilm rolls, original paper records forensically tested, and the original WORM (write-once-read-many) disks onto which the images were stored from scans when the system was computerized/digitized. These are the documents that Congress should DEMAND AN IMMEDIATE independent investigation of (with Maricopa Co, AZ Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse taking part, for the sake of accountability).

      SUMMARY: Stig Waidelich’s computer-generated COLB has a BC# that requires a 12,400% variance from the average birth rate within a 2.5-hour period. It is obviously falsified. So not only do we have paper records (1960-64 birth index, the Ah Nee and Obama BC’s, and the Sunahara death certificate) being falsified by the HDOH, but we have the BC# in the computer system itself being falsified. And all these falsified certificates claimed BC#’s that could not have been on those BC’s in 1961. Stig Waidelich is almost certainly the original owner of the BC# that the HDOH has verified as currently belonging to Obama. -
      (bold, color and underline emphasis added)

      In the next installment we will look at the only circumstance in which a new BC# can lawfully be assigned to a person. That will be the key that opens the door on what the HDOH has done, when, and why. Everything we’ve seen makes sense when we realize how the HDOH could legally try to justify giving Obama the BC# that belonged to Stig Waidelich.

      Exhibit A: Stig Waidelich Certificate of Live Birth
      (copied from https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/i...osKGIJGLhPvVK0 – a still photo from a CNN video)

      An enlargement found at http://i54.tinypic.com/2ze08wo.jpg
      Last edited by bsteadman; 03-25-2013, 08:13 PM.
      B. Steadman

      Comment


      • #4
        The following is COMMENT #26, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

        I have to speak whether I think it is going anywhere or not, because I have to be able to live with myself. The results are up to the people who either defend the rule of law or don’t, but they will not have the excuse that they had no evidence that there was a problem. The responsibility will fall on THEIR shoulders, not mine, because I did what I could.

        If it’s been fear of black riots if Obama was shown to be ineligible, I think that fear is dwarfed by the reality that DHS has billions of rounds of hollow-point bullets for reasons that they won’t explain to anybody. That’s in anticipation of something MUCH, MUCH bigger than black riots if Obama is shown ineligible.

        IOW, it is becoming increasingly clear that keeping America on Obama’s path will be much, much more deadly than confronting the lawlessness that put Obama in power. Without intervention, Civil War seems inevitable - and if that’s conspiracy talk, then the DHS people are the biggest conspiracy theorists in the country, because they are the ones preparing for this.

        Hearing about the forensic psychologist (who cracked the Natalie Holloway case and the Jon Benet Ramsey case, etc) who says that Obama is basically warning us that he is going to create Armageddon for America should put the fear of God into SOMEBODY, I would think. Because some of them have to know enough about history to know that if God abandons a country to their own depravity and lawlessness, that country is doomed to be destroyed.



        The following is COMMENT #28 by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

        Another thing is that the records that need to be seen are already right there. Nobody has to go digging for proof. The records are always supposed to be available, always supposed to be able to be audited, and have been specifically created to facilitate easy disclosure. This is a whole different level than trying to sort out the crimes associated with Fast and Furious or Benghazi. There are no excuses for Hawaii to keep these records hidden from a federal prosecutor, if we can get an independent prosecutor appointed.

        And given the KNOWN fabrications by the HDOH, every minute that Fuddy continues to have the ability to falsify and/or fabricate records is a national security risk.
        Last edited by bsteadman; 03-25-2013, 08:44 PM.
        B. Steadman

        Comment

        Working...
        X