Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Popcorn: Obama Identity Document Fraud Case Appealed To Alabama Supreme Court

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Popcorn: Obama Identity Document Fraud Case Appealed To Alabama Supreme Court

    Popcorn: Obama Identity Document Fraud Case Appealed To Alabama Supreme Court

    Birther Report

    3/30/2013

    Excerpt:

    OBAMA ELIGIBILITY APPEAL IN ROY MOORE'S COURT
    Newly elected state chief justice has expressed doubt about qualification
    WND


    Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for office.

    Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.

    Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

    Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for oral arguments.

    “We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND. [...]

    In an earlier step in the case one year ago, before a panel of Alabama Supreme Court justices, one justice raised doubts about Obama’s eligibility.

    The justices denied a petition filed by McInnish seeking to require Obama submit an original birth certificate before he could be placed on the state’s 2012 ballot.

    Justice Tom Parker filed a special, unpublished concurrence in the case arguing that McInnish’s charges of “forgery” were legitimate cause for concern. [...]

    CONTINUED HERE: http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/obama-eli...y-moores-court

    FILED BRIEF VIA JACK RYAN EMBEDDED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/133193816


    View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...-supremes.html
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Attorney Larry Klayman is probably the only hope AMERICA has to expose , indict , and remove the
    imposter from our oval office and Whitehouse . He successfully brought impeachment proceedings against
    " SLICK WILLIE Clinton " , and sued several other wrongdoers . Let us hope and pray that the combination of
    KLAYMAN and Judge Roy Moore will very soon accomplish what nobody else has done ~ including the
    Cold Case Posse of Sheriff Joe Arpaio , Mike Zullo and the gang .

    Comment


    • #3
      I have a serious concern, what do you think?

      Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

      Orly Taitz, Esq.
      4/2/2013

      Excerpt:

      There is one issue that really concerns me: why in light of evidence of forgery would plaintiffs seek a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate and not examination of the original?

      Originally there were 45 attorneys and hundreds of pro se plaintiffs, who filed election challenges and legal challenges. At the end, people got frustrated, overwhelmed and aside from me only one other attorney has a case, and he recently filed an appellant’s brief in AL. The brief is seeking an appeal of the denial of the Petition of writ of mandamus, an order for the Secretary of State to seek a certified copy of Obama’s birth certificate.

      Probably there is no person in the country who wants this case to be heard on the merits and succeed more than I do, I hope this case is heard on the merits, however I am concerned about a couple of problems. One, of course, is the notion by the Secretary of State that she has no duty to seek the certified copy and that it is moot. Let’s say 2 out of 3 judges on the panel rule for the plaintiffs (there are 7 judges in this court and we do not know if Roy Moore will be on the panel of 3 who actually hear this case), let’s say the court grants requested relief, which of course is very unlikely. What happens next? I am extremely concerned that the same registrar from the state of HI, who was complicit for 4 years now will certify another copy of the same forgery and this will be used as a big victory by Obama over the birthers. Obama will claim that this is the ultimate proof. Why are attorneys in AL asking for a certified copy instead of the examination of the original?

      Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates

      A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as the original unless a genuine question is raised about the original’s authenticity or the circumstances make it unfair to admit the duplicate.

      This is a federal rule, which is similar to the rules of evidence in every state. Why aren;t they asking examination of the original?

      ...................................

      View the complete post at:

      http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=410507
      B. Steadman

      Comment

      Working...
      X