Tweet
Eligibility Case With Sheriff Joe Obama Identity Fraud Affidavit At Florida Supreme Court
Birther Report
5/2/2013
Excerpt:
- New Plaintiff Petition for FL Supreme Court Voeltz v Obama Eligibility Case Appeal
Attorney Larry Klayman and Plaintiff Mike Voeltz have submitted their final Petition for Writ of Mandamus on the deadline day of 4-29-13. The original case was dismissed for all the wrong reasons, making it eminently appealable. They have been keeping this case low profile lately, but are in action again to meet the filing deadline. - George Miller @ Obama Ballot Challenge.
EXCERPTS VIA FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS:
Petitioner, Michael C. Voeltz, pursuant to Fla. App. R. 9.100 B, files this Petition for “Writ of Mandamus” to compel the District Court of Appeal, First District ("Court of Appeal"), to reinstate the appeal of Voeltz v. Obama, et al, case no. 2012CA00467, 1D12- 3489, which was improperly dismissed by court order dated February 8, 2013.
In the alternative, Petitioner files this Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct Florida Secretary of State, Ken Detzner, to comply with Florida Statute 97.012(14), and direct the Court of Appeal to issue an opinion regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States. That is, is Mr. Obama at least thirty-five years old, a resident of the United States for fourteen years, and a natural born citizen, as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution? [...]
STATEMENT OF FACTS
As with the presidential election of 2008, Respondent Obama has never established his eligibility for the presidency of the United States. Indeed, neither Respondent Obama, nor the Democratic Party of Florida has even stated that Respondent Obama is a "natural born citizen" as required to run for president as set forth in the Article II, section 1, clause 4, of the U.S. Constitution. (R.112-114). The only so-called evidence of Respondent Obama's birth within the United States has come in the form of an electronic version of a birth certificate posted on the internet. (R.112). There is uncontroverted evidence, however, on the record, to show that this "birth certificate" has either been altered or is entirely fraudulent. (R.260-278). No physical, paper copy has ever been presented to firmly establish that Respondent Obama was indeed born within the United States. (R.112).
Yet even if his purported "birth certificate" is to be believed, Respondent Obama was born to a mother who was a citizen of the United States, and a father who was a British subject, having been born in Kenya, a British colony at the time. (R.112). The U.S. Constitution requires that all who serve as President of the United States must be "natural born citizen[s]." The U.S. Supreme Court has defined this term to mean a child born to two citizen parents. (R.245-260).Since Respondent Obama was not born to parents who were both citizens of the United States, he is not a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution (R.114) and therefore ineligible to be the President of the United States. [...]
The eligibility of Respondent Obama must be dealt with now. Petitioner Voeltz, who is a registered Democrat, and the rest of the electors in the state of Florida, had to be assured that if they cast their votes for Respondent Obama in the general election that their votes would not have been in vain. [...]
ARGUMENT
This Case Is Not Moot
Although the Court of Appeal has conveniently declared this case “moot” after many months of inactivity, it is a paradigm of the exceptions to the mootness doctrine. The issue of what is a natural born citizen and who checks to make sure that presidential candidates are natural born citizens is an ongoing dispute. Continuous election cycles assure that this issue will arise again.
Petitioner's claim, at a minimum, is not moot because this harm is "capable of repetition, yet evading review." Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973). [...]
Petitioner is capable of suffering the same harm in near future elections, as many being touted as candidates for president and vice president are born of non-U.S. citizen parents (one or both), and do not fit the precedent definition of Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1874), including Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum and Ted Cruz. The issue of who is a natural born citizen and who decides who is a natural born citizen needs to be settled now. [...]
Credible Evidence That Respondent Obama's Birth Certificate Is Fraudulent
Petitioner also presented credible evidence from an official source, by affidavit of Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, who conducted an official government investigation that the “birth certificate” of Barack Hussein Obama, posted at the WhiteHouse.gov website is entirely fraudulent. No one on the mainland has touched that document and felt the supposed “raised seal,” as it only exists in cyberspace. If a “raised seal,” as required by Hawaiian law is required to be deemed valid, then there is no validity to a picture of that document on the computer. Petitioner cannot show the U.S. Post Office a picture of his birth certificate on a laptop and receive a passport. As such, Barack Hussein Obama cannot even prove that he is at least thirty five years old, much less a natural born citizen. If a baby-faced seventeen-year-old attempted to be on the presidential ballot in Florida, claiming to be 35, would the Secretary demand his birth certificate? [...]
FULL PETITION EMBEDDED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/139032306
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...joe-obama.html
Birther Report
5/2/2013
Excerpt:
- New Plaintiff Petition for FL Supreme Court Voeltz v Obama Eligibility Case Appeal
Attorney Larry Klayman and Plaintiff Mike Voeltz have submitted their final Petition for Writ of Mandamus on the deadline day of 4-29-13. The original case was dismissed for all the wrong reasons, making it eminently appealable. They have been keeping this case low profile lately, but are in action again to meet the filing deadline. - George Miller @ Obama Ballot Challenge.
EXCERPTS VIA FILED PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS:
Petitioner, Michael C. Voeltz, pursuant to Fla. App. R. 9.100 B, files this Petition for “Writ of Mandamus” to compel the District Court of Appeal, First District ("Court of Appeal"), to reinstate the appeal of Voeltz v. Obama, et al, case no. 2012CA00467, 1D12- 3489, which was improperly dismissed by court order dated February 8, 2013.
In the alternative, Petitioner files this Petition for a Writ of Mandamus to direct Florida Secretary of State, Ken Detzner, to comply with Florida Statute 97.012(14), and direct the Court of Appeal to issue an opinion regarding the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President of the United States. That is, is Mr. Obama at least thirty-five years old, a resident of the United States for fourteen years, and a natural born citizen, as required by Article II of the U.S. Constitution? [...]
STATEMENT OF FACTS
As with the presidential election of 2008, Respondent Obama has never established his eligibility for the presidency of the United States. Indeed, neither Respondent Obama, nor the Democratic Party of Florida has even stated that Respondent Obama is a "natural born citizen" as required to run for president as set forth in the Article II, section 1, clause 4, of the U.S. Constitution. (R.112-114). The only so-called evidence of Respondent Obama's birth within the United States has come in the form of an electronic version of a birth certificate posted on the internet. (R.112). There is uncontroverted evidence, however, on the record, to show that this "birth certificate" has either been altered or is entirely fraudulent. (R.260-278). No physical, paper copy has ever been presented to firmly establish that Respondent Obama was indeed born within the United States. (R.112).
Yet even if his purported "birth certificate" is to be believed, Respondent Obama was born to a mother who was a citizen of the United States, and a father who was a British subject, having been born in Kenya, a British colony at the time. (R.112). The U.S. Constitution requires that all who serve as President of the United States must be "natural born citizen[s]." The U.S. Supreme Court has defined this term to mean a child born to two citizen parents. (R.245-260).Since Respondent Obama was not born to parents who were both citizens of the United States, he is not a "natural born citizen" as required by the U.S. Constitution (R.114) and therefore ineligible to be the President of the United States. [...]
The eligibility of Respondent Obama must be dealt with now. Petitioner Voeltz, who is a registered Democrat, and the rest of the electors in the state of Florida, had to be assured that if they cast their votes for Respondent Obama in the general election that their votes would not have been in vain. [...]
ARGUMENT
This Case Is Not Moot
Although the Court of Appeal has conveniently declared this case “moot” after many months of inactivity, it is a paradigm of the exceptions to the mootness doctrine. The issue of what is a natural born citizen and who checks to make sure that presidential candidates are natural born citizens is an ongoing dispute. Continuous election cycles assure that this issue will arise again.
Petitioner's claim, at a minimum, is not moot because this harm is "capable of repetition, yet evading review." Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 125 (1973). [...]
Petitioner is capable of suffering the same harm in near future elections, as many being touted as candidates for president and vice president are born of non-U.S. citizen parents (one or both), and do not fit the precedent definition of Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167 (1874), including Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum and Ted Cruz. The issue of who is a natural born citizen and who decides who is a natural born citizen needs to be settled now. [...]
Credible Evidence That Respondent Obama's Birth Certificate Is Fraudulent
Petitioner also presented credible evidence from an official source, by affidavit of Maricopa County, Arizona, Sheriff Joseph Arpaio, who conducted an official government investigation that the “birth certificate” of Barack Hussein Obama, posted at the WhiteHouse.gov website is entirely fraudulent. No one on the mainland has touched that document and felt the supposed “raised seal,” as it only exists in cyberspace. If a “raised seal,” as required by Hawaiian law is required to be deemed valid, then there is no validity to a picture of that document on the computer. Petitioner cannot show the U.S. Post Office a picture of his birth certificate on a laptop and receive a passport. As such, Barack Hussein Obama cannot even prove that he is at least thirty five years old, much less a natural born citizen. If a baby-faced seventeen-year-old attempted to be on the presidential ballot in Florida, claiming to be 35, would the Secretary demand his birth certificate? [...]
FULL PETITION EMBEDDED BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/139032306
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...joe-obama.html