Tweet
Three And Counting: Rep. Barletta Now Behind Team Arpaio Obama ID Fraud Investigation
Birther Report
8/6/2013
Excerpt:
WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com Radio to Host The Post & Email Tuesday Evening
“THREE AND COUNTING”
By Sharon Sharon Rondeau | The Post & Email
(Aug. 6, 2013) — The owner of the website WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com, Mike Volin, recently met with his congressman, Lou Barletta, to show him evidence of the crime of forgery in the creation of the long-form birth certificate image bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II” posted on the White House website. Two other constituents attended the meeting.
PPSimmons, which has been reporting extensively on the forgery, lists Barletta as one of three congressmen who believe that a congressional investigation into the matter may be warranted.
Rep. Steve Stockman of Texas was the first congressman to indicate to investigators that he wanted to see Congress take action. The birth certificate image was posted on April 27, 2011 after business mogul Donald Trump and others who were unconvinced of Obama’s life story publicly asked Obama to release it.
The U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen,” although the meaning of the term has been disputed for years, with news services conflating “natural born” with “native born.” Almost one hundred years ago, former ambassador to Italy under President Woodrow Wilson, Breckinridge Long,” claimed that Charles Evans Hughes was not a “natural born Citizen” because, even though Hughes had been born in the United States, his parents were British citizens at the time of the birth. Long cited several examples in which children of foreign-citizen parents were considered to have inherited the citizenship of their parents regardless of their birthplace.
Children of foreign diplomats stationed in or visiting the United States who happen to be born in the U.S. during their parents’ tenure are not considered U.S. citizens, but rather, citizens of their parents’ nation.
In 2008, an Egyptian-born man was disqualified from placing his name on the New Hampshire ballot for President of the United States because of his birthplace. Obama’s birthplace was reported as Kenya from 1991 to 2007 by his then-literary agent, which later said it made a “fact-checking error.”
Emmerich de Vattel, in his Enlightenment-era treatise “The Law of Nations,” which was heavily used by the Framers of the Constitution, wrote in Chapter 19:
Officials at the Hawaii Department of Health have not affirmed that the image on the White House website is the same as the document they allegedly have in their files for Obama.
Major media companies have refused to report on the forgery, and supportive sycophants have stood behind it.
Volin has assembled a “Sheriff’s Kit” which can be used by any citizen seeking to speak with his or her county sheriff, state legislator, congressman or senator about the forgery.
Zullo has urged constituents to send handwritten or typed hard-copy letters to congressional offices to demonstrate their desire for a congressional investigation. Sample letters are here and here:
Dear Congressman Stockman,
I am writing this letter to let you know that We The People are behind you in your efforts to bring the Obama Identity Fraud Scandal to a full congressional investigation.
Thank you for your courageous and constitutional stand in this matter. We will support you with our outspoken support, our prayers, and our donations to help keep you in office. I am using every outreach method available to me (mail, email, FaceBook, phone calls, etc.) to make certain that many others know of your valiant efforts.
If there is something else that I can do, please let me know.
Sincerely,
YOUR NAME
Two weeks ago, a public employee acknowledged off-the-record to The Post & Email that it is widely-known that the White House birth certificate is a forgery. She personally shared that she perceived Obama as “taking away our rights,” particularly that of the Second Amendment, and expressed her concern for the direction of the country in general.
The Post & Email will be a guest on Volin’s radio show on Tuesday evening at 8:00 p.m. EDT/5:00 p.m. PDT to discuss developments in the birth certificate investigation. Volin has previously interviewed Zullo and Carl Gallups of PPSimmons and the “Freedom Friday” radio show.
Source link. © 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...letta-now.html
Birther Report
8/6/2013
Excerpt:
WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com Radio to Host The Post & Email Tuesday Evening
“THREE AND COUNTING”
By Sharon Sharon Rondeau | The Post & Email
(Aug. 6, 2013) — The owner of the website WheresObamasBirthCertificate.com, Mike Volin, recently met with his congressman, Lou Barletta, to show him evidence of the crime of forgery in the creation of the long-form birth certificate image bearing the name “Barack Hussein Obama II” posted on the White House website. Two other constituents attended the meeting.
PPSimmons, which has been reporting extensively on the forgery, lists Barletta as one of three congressmen who believe that a congressional investigation into the matter may be warranted.
Rep. Steve Stockman of Texas was the first congressman to indicate to investigators that he wanted to see Congress take action. The birth certificate image was posted on April 27, 2011 after business mogul Donald Trump and others who were unconvinced of Obama’s life story publicly asked Obama to release it.
The U.S. Constitution requires that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen,” although the meaning of the term has been disputed for years, with news services conflating “natural born” with “native born.” Almost one hundred years ago, former ambassador to Italy under President Woodrow Wilson, Breckinridge Long,” claimed that Charles Evans Hughes was not a “natural born Citizen” because, even though Hughes had been born in the United States, his parents were British citizens at the time of the birth. Long cited several examples in which children of foreign-citizen parents were considered to have inherited the citizenship of their parents regardless of their birthplace.
Children of foreign diplomats stationed in or visiting the United States who happen to be born in the U.S. during their parents’ tenure are not considered U.S. citizens, but rather, citizens of their parents’ nation.
In 2008, an Egyptian-born man was disqualified from placing his name on the New Hampshire ballot for President of the United States because of his birthplace. Obama’s birthplace was reported as Kenya from 1991 to 2007 by his then-literary agent, which later said it made a “fact-checking error.”
Emmerich de Vattel, in his Enlightenment-era treatise “The Law of Nations,” which was heavily used by the Framers of the Constitution, wrote in Chapter 19:
§ 212. Citizens and natives.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
§ 213. Inhabitants.
The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.
The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights. The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it. The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent. We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born. I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.
§ 213. Inhabitants.
The inhabitants, as distinguished from citizens, are foreigners, who are permitted to settle and stay in the country. Bound to the society by their residence, they are subject to the laws of the state while they reside in it; and they are obliged to defend it, because it grants them protection, though they do not participate in all the rights of citizens. They enjoy only the advantages which the law or custom gives them. The perpetual inhabitants are those who have received the right of perpetual residence. These are a kind of citizens of an inferior order, and are united to the society without participating in all its advantages. Their children follow the condition of their fathers; and, as the state has given to these the right of perpetual residence, their right passes to their posterity.
Officials at the Hawaii Department of Health have not affirmed that the image on the White House website is the same as the document they allegedly have in their files for Obama.
Major media companies have refused to report on the forgery, and supportive sycophants have stood behind it.
Volin has assembled a “Sheriff’s Kit” which can be used by any citizen seeking to speak with his or her county sheriff, state legislator, congressman or senator about the forgery.
Zullo has urged constituents to send handwritten or typed hard-copy letters to congressional offices to demonstrate their desire for a congressional investigation. Sample letters are here and here:
Dear Congressman Stockman,
I am writing this letter to let you know that We The People are behind you in your efforts to bring the Obama Identity Fraud Scandal to a full congressional investigation.
Thank you for your courageous and constitutional stand in this matter. We will support you with our outspoken support, our prayers, and our donations to help keep you in office. I am using every outreach method available to me (mail, email, FaceBook, phone calls, etc.) to make certain that many others know of your valiant efforts.
If there is something else that I can do, please let me know.
Sincerely,
YOUR NAME
Two weeks ago, a public employee acknowledged off-the-record to The Post & Email that it is widely-known that the White House birth certificate is a forgery. She personally shared that she perceived Obama as “taking away our rights,” particularly that of the Second Amendment, and expressed her concern for the direction of the country in general.
The Post & Email will be a guest on Volin’s radio show on Tuesday evening at 8:00 p.m. EDT/5:00 p.m. PDT to discuss developments in the birth certificate investigation. Volin has previously interviewed Zullo and Carl Gallups of PPSimmons and the “Freedom Friday” radio show.
Source link. © 2013, The Post & Email. All rights reserved.
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...letta-now.html