Tweet
Judge Issues Order For Document Experts Obama Fraud & Treason Notice
Birther Report
11/6/2013
Excerpt:
Judge Orders Document Expert To Show Cause Why Obama Fraud Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed:
United States District Judge James Robart has issued an order regarding Doug Vogt's Obama ID fraud notice requiring Vogt to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Douglas Vogt v. Barack Obama
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Before the court is Plaintiff Douglas Vogt’s complaint in which he alleges that the certificates of live birth from the State of Hawaii that President Barack Obama has publicly released are forgeries. (See Compl. (Dkt. # 1) at 1-2.) He also alleges that President Obama “was not born in Hawaii and is not a US citizen,” and that a treasonous conspiracy exists among the various defendants “to take over a political party and install a Communist agent in [sic] as President of the United States so as to destroy the nation from within.” (Id. at 5.) Accordingly, he asks the court “to bring to the attention of the grand jury the evidence of criminal behavior sworn to herein.” (Id. at 9 (internal quotation marks omitted).) Having reviewed the complaint, the court ORDERS. Mr. Vogt to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as delineated below. (...)
FULL ORDER BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/181935695 - Hat tip Jim Youngblood.
CDR Kerchner comments: I read what the judge wrote and my answer to him would be that Mr. Vogt is not the one who would bring the criminal charges, the grand jury would. Mr. Vogt is simply reporting crimes per the law to a federal judge and it is he, the judge who has the STANDING to refer it to a federal grand jury. The judge is setting up a strawman as to what Vogt asked for in his filing to the judge. He is reporting felonies and treason to a federal judge as outlined in the USC and the judge has the standing and duty to take action and refer it to a grand jury for review of the evidence, given the very grave nature of the crimes. CDR Kerchner (Ret)
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/11...raud-case.html
Birther Report
11/6/2013
Excerpt:
Judge Orders Document Expert To Show Cause Why Obama Fraud Complaint Should Not Be Dismissed:
United States District Judge James Robart has issued an order regarding Doug Vogt's Obama ID fraud notice requiring Vogt to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Douglas Vogt v. Barack Obama
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Before the court is Plaintiff Douglas Vogt’s complaint in which he alleges that the certificates of live birth from the State of Hawaii that President Barack Obama has publicly released are forgeries. (See Compl. (Dkt. # 1) at 1-2.) He also alleges that President Obama “was not born in Hawaii and is not a US citizen,” and that a treasonous conspiracy exists among the various defendants “to take over a political party and install a Communist agent in [sic] as President of the United States so as to destroy the nation from within.” (Id. at 5.) Accordingly, he asks the court “to bring to the attention of the grand jury the evidence of criminal behavior sworn to herein.” (Id. at 9 (internal quotation marks omitted).) Having reviewed the complaint, the court ORDERS. Mr. Vogt to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, as delineated below. (...)
FULL ORDER BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/181935695 - Hat tip Jim Youngblood.
CDR Kerchner comments: I read what the judge wrote and my answer to him would be that Mr. Vogt is not the one who would bring the criminal charges, the grand jury would. Mr. Vogt is simply reporting crimes per the law to a federal judge and it is he, the judge who has the STANDING to refer it to a federal grand jury. The judge is setting up a strawman as to what Vogt asked for in his filing to the judge. He is reporting felonies and treason to a federal judge as outlined in the USC and the judge has the standing and duty to take action and refer it to a grand jury for review of the evidence, given the very grave nature of the crimes. CDR Kerchner (Ret)
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://www.birtherreport.com/2013/11...raud-case.html