Tweet
Write-in Presidential Candidate Files Writ of Quo Warranto to Oust Obama And/Or Prevent Obama From Accessing 2012 Ballot
Birther Report
1/7/2012
Original article by Montgomery Blair Sibley
http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/2d.html
Excerpts:
"Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Ronald Machen - Writ of Quo Warranto - United States District Court For The District Of Columbia - Case Assigned To Obama Appointed District Judge Amy Berman Jackson -
Re: Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama pursuant to District of Columbia Code, Division II, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Title 16, Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters, Chapter 35, §§ 3501-3503
Greetings,
I write as an “interested person” requesting that you institute Quo Warranto proceeding against Barack Obama pursuant to D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35, §3502 on your own motion, or if you prefer, upon relation to me.
As an initial matter, I maintain that I am a “person interested” as referenced in §3503 as I am a declared write-in candidate for the November 6, 2012, election for the office of President of the United States. See: Exhibit “A”. As such, under the plain language of Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 (1915), I have standing to make this request of you.
Clearly, under §3501, Barack Obama, “within the District of Columbia . . .holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States”, to wit, (i) in the District of Columbia, a place upon the November 6, 2012, ballot as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States and (ii) the office of President of the United States. As more fully described below, I maintain that, in both cases, he “usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully” holds or exercises such franchise and/or public office in violation of §3501.
Indisputably, in order to be President of the United States, Article II, §1, of the U.S. Constitution requires: “No person except a natural born Citizen . . ., shall be eligible to the Office of President.” The phrase “natural born Citizen” is a 18th Century legal term of art with a definite meaning. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, that phrase was defined as: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” (The Law of Nations, Emerich de Vattel, 1758, Chapter 19, § 212)....
Clearly, Barack Obama has represented that he is the son of a non-citizen of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., who was a citizen of Kenya. Accordingly, upon the law and facts, Barack Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” and thus “usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully” holds – and seeks again to be elected to – the office of President of the United States."
View the complete article at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...rranto-to.html
Birther Report
1/7/2012
Original article by Montgomery Blair Sibley
http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com/2d.html
Excerpts:
"Montgomery Blair Sibley v. Barack Obama, Eric Holder, Ronald Machen - Writ of Quo Warranto - United States District Court For The District Of Columbia - Case Assigned To Obama Appointed District Judge Amy Berman Jackson -
Re: Request to Institute Quo Warranto Proceeding Against Barack Obama pursuant to District of Columbia Code, Division II, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure, Title 16, Particular Actions, Proceedings and Matters, Chapter 35, §§ 3501-3503
Greetings,
I write as an “interested person” requesting that you institute Quo Warranto proceeding against Barack Obama pursuant to D.C. Code, Division II, Title 16, Chapter 35, §3502 on your own motion, or if you prefer, upon relation to me.
As an initial matter, I maintain that I am a “person interested” as referenced in §3503 as I am a declared write-in candidate for the November 6, 2012, election for the office of President of the United States. See: Exhibit “A”. As such, under the plain language of Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, 238 U.S. 537 (1915), I have standing to make this request of you.
Clearly, under §3501, Barack Obama, “within the District of Columbia . . .holds or exercises, a franchise conferred by the United States or a public office of the United States”, to wit, (i) in the District of Columbia, a place upon the November 6, 2012, ballot as the Democratic candidate for President of the United States and (ii) the office of President of the United States. As more fully described below, I maintain that, in both cases, he “usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully” holds or exercises such franchise and/or public office in violation of §3501.
Indisputably, in order to be President of the United States, Article II, §1, of the U.S. Constitution requires: “No person except a natural born Citizen . . ., shall be eligible to the Office of President.” The phrase “natural born Citizen” is a 18th Century legal term of art with a definite meaning. At the time of the adoption of the Constitution, that phrase was defined as: “The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.” (The Law of Nations, Emerich de Vattel, 1758, Chapter 19, § 212)....
Clearly, Barack Obama has represented that he is the son of a non-citizen of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., who was a citizen of Kenya. Accordingly, upon the law and facts, Barack Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” and thus “usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully” holds – and seeks again to be elected to – the office of President of the United States."
View the complete article at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...rranto-to.html