Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Letter RE Subpoenas in the GA Ballot Challenge from Atty. Taiz -- Birther Report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Letter RE Subpoenas in the GA Ballot Challenge from Atty. Taiz -- Birther Report

    Open Letter Regarding Subpoenas In The Georgia Ballot Challenge
    From Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.


    Birther Report

    1/9/2012

    "Editor's note: For months now, comments and private messages submitted to this site related to posts reporting on Dr. Orly Taitz’s legal work has run the gamut from faithful support to questioning her strategy to outright accusing her of legal malpractice. BirtherReport.com strives to remain neutral and impartial regarding coverage of all efforts put forward by citizens, legislators and attorneys. Today, we received a letter from a concerned citizen who resides in Georgia questioning recent legal maneuvers Dr. Taitz has made that may or may not have bearing on the January 26, 2012 OSAH hearing.

    In an effort to provide clarity to our readers in regards to this critical issue we are reprinting this letter in full -


    Dear Birther Report Editor,

    I have considered myself a “birther” for quite some time now, and I do occasionally contribute financially to the cause. At the very least, I try to keep up with all of the news regarding the usurper in our White House, and there is something that has been bothering me lately, to the point that I feel the need to voice my concern.

    Not only do I try to keep up with all of the different efforts, I also follow all the lawsuits filed by Dr. Orly Taitz, and other than the fact that it often looks like she is more concerned with promoting Orly Taitz than she is with the very important task at hand for the American people, I tend to look past that, because she does bring a lot of attention to the fraud that has been committed, and I commend her for that.

    However, there is something I can no longer look past, because it is something that speaks to character, and in this huge battle, I believe keeping ourselves above board and honest to be of the utmost importance.

    Recently, Dr. Taitz has been stating on her website and elsewhere that Georgia Judge Michael Malihi has issued subpoenas related to her Georgia case, and she has even posted images of the subpoenas. Does she really think that people are that gullible? She has done nothing but download pre-signed subpoena forms from the Georgia OSAH website (www.osah.ga.gov) that are made available to attorneys involved in cases there. Even nobodies like I know that a Georgia Administrative Court doesn't have the power to subpoena officials from other states! So, how dishonest is it for Orly to represent that Judge Malihi doesn't understand that simple legal principle, and that he is issuing these subpoenas? Even if he did have that power, it would be a lie that his court issued the “subpoenas” that Orly is posting and gloating about. Downloading blank forms and filling them out is not the same as a judge-issued subpoena!

    It appears the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings is on to Orly's dishonesty now, because the link (http://www.osah.ga.gov/documents/subpoenas/subpoena.doc) they have for those blank subpoena forms is now dead!

    Here is my why I am writing to you. It has been difficult enough for us to be heard on the facts that we know are true—and when one of the “names” in the movement is so publicly dishonest, it just discredits everything that the movement has worked so hard to accomplish. It also causes me to wonder what else Dr. Taitz has not been honest about! Is she just spreading lies hoping that it will cause people to donate more money to her? Just a little bit of research showed me that Mr. and Mrs. Orly live in a $3 million home in Laguna Niguel, CA. It looks like they already have a lot more money than most of us do, but she's the most vocal in the entire movement with the money-begging.

    Does she occasionally smear the good names and efforts of others in the movement as a way to divert possible donations away from them and to her, or is it just that, in her mind, she must be the only one in the spotlight? I can't imagine that most donations amount to all that much—they certainly cannot be worth enough for someone to forfeit their honor and integrity. But that's what I tend to see from Dr. Taitz.

    I know this has been a long note, and that wasn't my intention, but here is the real question I want to ask you. Why aren't all the good people who are so active in this movement publicly denouncing these tactics? I'm sure they all know that Orly has never gotten a subpoena issued from Judge Malihi. If they all know these are lies, why aren't they publicly condemning the deception?

    Just wondering,

    A concerned “Georgia Citizen”


    Editor's note: We will re print in full a response from Dr. Taitz that addresses only the concerns outlined in the above letter if she so chooses. We have also provided below a copy of the blank, pre-signed and pre-stamped, subpoena that was once hosted on the OSAH website for download."


    View the complete article at:

    http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...poenas-in.html
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Attn. Orly Taitz: Clarification Response to Birther Report Article

    More clarification on my GA case

    Defend Our Freedoms Foundation

    Attorney Orly Taitz
    1/10/2012

    Excerpt:

    "Yet again I was maligned by people claiming to be on the same side and hiding behind anonymous names. This is the last time I am responding to anonymous attacks. I operate in the open, my name and my bar license are known. In the future, people, who attack me, need to get out of the shadows, provide their name, their bar license and specific rules and statutes, that they are claiming.

    If I, as a dissident against the Obama regime, can operate in the open, why are they hiding behind the assumed names? What are they afraid of? Any person, who believes, he can do a better job in challenging Obama, is welcome to file his own case and win it.

    In relation to subpoenas, some uneducated morons, who do not have any legal background are claiming that it is somehow illegal to issue subpoenas. This is a total and complete nonsense. We are less than 3 weeks before trial. Subpoenas are proper. Obama is the defendant in the case, his motion to dismiss was denied by the judge, which means he needs to stand trial. If the defendant does not want to comply with the subpoena, his proper action would be to file a motion to quash the subpoena. If the judge grants his motion to quash, then he does not have to appear at trial. I do not need to ask any more permissions, as they claim. The ball is in Obama’s court, if he does not want to appear and produce requested documents, he is supposed to file a motion to quash.

    Why 2 other attorneys are not issueing any subpoenas? The answer is simple. Their cases are limited. One attorney stated in his pleadings, that his case will last only 10 minutes. Their cases rest only on one short statement by the court in one case Minor v Happersett."


    View Attorney Orly Taitz' complete post on the topic at:

    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=30206
    Last edited by bsteadman; 01-10-2012, 07:16 PM.
    B. Steadman

    Comment

    Working...
    X