Hawaii Supreme Court Denies Taitz's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus in Taitz v. Judge Nishimura
Birther Report
1/12/2012
Excerpt:
View the complete article at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...ly-taitzs.html
Birther Report
1/12/2012
Excerpt:
"Orly Taitz vs. Judge Rhonda Nishimura - Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Denied - Hawaii Supreme Court - 1/12/2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz’s petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai5i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures.).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied."
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Petitioner,
vs.
THE HONORABLE RHONDA A. NISHIMURA, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT
COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI, Respondent.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
ORDER
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner Dr. Orly Taitz’s petition for a writ of mandamus, it appears that petitioner fails to demonstrate an entitlement to mandamus relief. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai5i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (A writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action. Such writs are not intended to supersede the legal discretionary authority of the lower courts, nor are they intended to serve as legal remedies in lieu of normal appellate procedures.).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied."
View the complete article at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...ly-taitzs.html