Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Burden of Proof in Georgia -- Obama Conspiracy Theories, Dr. Conspiracy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Burden of Proof in Georgia -- Obama Conspiracy Theories, Dr. Conspiracy

    Burden of Proof in Georgia

    Obama Conspiracy Theories

    Dr. Conspiracy
    1/16/2012

    WARNING: Site is NOT birther friendly. Don full protective gear and gas mask before proceeding. Falsehoods and half-truths lie hidden to entice and trap the unwary visitor!

    Excerpt:

    "So far Obama’s attorney hasn’t shown that he intends to mount much of a defense. He didn’t list any exhibits in his pre-trial order (http://www.scribd.com/doc/75913036/F...ial-Submission) and only one witness, one that can’t speak to the facts of Obama’s birth. So what is zero plus zero? It looks like such an answer would be a lose for Obama because in a previous decision in O’BRIEN v. GROSS (http://alt.cimedia.com/ajc/pdf/polinsider/gross.pdf), Judge Malihi wrote:

    "Under Haynes v. Wells, 273 Ga. 106, 538 S.E.2d 430 (2000), the burden of proof is entirely upon Respondent to establish affirmatively his eligibility for office."

    My advice to Mr. Jablonski is to bring a birth certificate with him and maybe some documents to show Obama’s residence for the past 14 years. That way Obama looks just everybody else who sometimes has to show documentation."

    (bold and underline emphasis added)

    View the complete article at:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/...of-in-georgia/
    B. Steadman
Working...
X