Announcement

**bsteadman** · 09-18-2012, 05:09 PM

MSNBC Video: Obama Camp Concede Defeat To Birthers

President Obama will stay on the ballot in Kansas

Before It's News
9/18/2012

Excerpt:

"Topeka, Kansas — The State Objections Board in Kansas has ruled. President Obama will stay on the ballot in November.

But the decision was met with chaos in Topeka on Monday as people on both sides of the issue began yelling at each other. At one point police broke up the crowd.

“This is over. Time to move it along,” said the officer.

The objections came from both sides. One woman yelled in favor of President Obama staying on the ballot in Kansas, saying the possibility of a sitting President not on the ballot is not right.

“It’s wrong that this is happening. So, it’s not the legacy of Kansas.”

A second woman, an attorney from California, got into the fray.

“We see evidence of the most serious crimes committed by Mr. Obama,” said Orly Taitz. “And he needs to be criminally prosecuted.”
.....................................

View the complete article, including video, at:

http://beforeitsnews.com/obama/2012/...s-2444554.html

**bsteadman** · 09-18-2012, 06:19 PM

Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Manhattan man to challenge Obama's appearance on the November ballot (Kansas)', which was started 9/13/2012 by 'Libloather'

The thread references a 9/13/2012 article in 'The Mercury' - http://www.themercury.com/News/artic...f27c5021f2619e

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2930674/posts

The following is COMMENT #99, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

Sounds like he got the same garbage that MDEC got, although it may not have been certified. Probably not because a letter of verification has to be requested in written form and this was requested over the phone. So what they got is probably has even less legal value than what MDEC got - which had no legal/probative value because the same thing could have been said about a non-valid as a valid record.

The whole situation is so transparent. The lt governor was with patients? When did they schedule those patients for him? On Friday evening after the objector withdrew his objection? The lawyer of the bunch - the one who has received all the legal information regarding why the Certification of Nomination is perjurious - was sick? And the surrogates - the ones who will never bear the legal responsibility for what was done - were the ones pushing to just get the whole thing over. How convenient.

No matter how they try to slice it, the legal responsibility for accepting a known-perjurious Certification of Nomination constitutes election fraud, and being absent from a meeting doesn’t absolve either Schmidt or Kobach of the responsibility to not commit election fraud. Having surrogates at one meeting does not excuse election fraud, and putting Obama on the ballot when you know his Certification of Nomination is fraudulent is election fraud. Period.

Both Kobach and Schmidt have been given legal notice of the reasons that the legal presumption HAS to be that Onaka confirmed a legally non-valid birth record for Obama, and unless what they received specifically stated that the record is legally valid, they’ve got NOTHING to even refute that presumption of regularity. If they had a legal document from Onaka certifying that they have a legally-valid record which claims a Honolulu Aug 4, 1961 birth to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama, then they’ve got at best 2 conflicting legal documents which calls into question the accuracy of EITHER.

There’s no way for Kobach and Schmidt to get out of the legal responsibility here. They are committing election fraud in accepting what is legally known to be a perjurious OCON, and the lawyer hiding behind a surrogate doesn’t change that fact - although it stinks to high heaven and strongly suggests that these guys know EXACTLY what is going on here, as does anybody who is informed beyond the pea-brained morons who read rags like the ones who claim Obama’s eligibility has already been proven when the legal facts are the exact opposite."

The following is COMMENT #100, by 'butterdezillion', in the thread:

"Onaka never said to either Bennett or MDEC that the BC actually matched - only that the information contained in the record matched. If the BC actually matched, then Onaka should have verified what Bennett requested - verification that the WH BC is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”.

Using the “matches” language is a heckuva lot different than saying the WH BC is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file.” Methinks that what Kobach got is the same thing that MDEC got, but what Kobach is SAYING he got is something altogether different. So either he doesn’t recognize the difference (which means he either didn’t read what Klayman sent him, or else he has zero reading comprehension skills), or he’s trying to make it sound like he’s got something that he doesn’t. Either of which just plain stinks.

Both Schmidt and Kobach have been alerted to the word-parsing that’s been done all along by the HDOH and should have seen past this, unless they are being wilfully ignorant.

Seeing what they actually received will tell us a lot. That could be why it’s taking some time for that office to fulfill my request."

**bsteadman** · 09-18-2012, 10:02 PM

Atty. Taitz: You can clearly hear me stating that Obama is using a stolen CT SSN

A LINK TO A CBS KANSAS REPORT, YOU CAN CLEARLY HEAR ME STATING THAT OBAMA IS USING A STOLEN CONNECTICUT SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
Orly Taitz, Esq.
9/18/2012

http://www.wibw.com/video/?autoStart...clipId=7735256

View the complete post by Dr. Taitz at:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=300497

Announcement

Press release on Kansas challenge against Obama -- Attorney Orly Taitz

Press release on Kansas challenge against Obama -- Attorney Orly Taitz

Comment

Comment

Comment