Tweet
Still More on Judy V Obama- 12-5276 Still Alive?
Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012
GeorgeM
9/26/2012
Excerpt:
[I]Being “dissected.” For euthanasia? After watching Roberts cynically change his vote and destroy the opposition to unconstitutional Obamacare, I don’t trust him as far as I could throw him. Is he intending to overturn Minor v Happersett, or weasel around it (Obamacare is a TAX, idiots)? Or will he really address this case properly? Pray on, gang. Our fate may be in the hands of fools– again.
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As Seen on: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/09...scotus-12.html
BACK IN THE SHIP OF DELAY WILL SCOTUS 12-5276 JUDY V. OBAMA COME OUT UNSCATHED?
According to a phone call I received today, from a source I cannot disclose but to say it was credible, my case in the United States Supreme Court JUDY v. OBAMA Case No. 12-5276 was delayed. My case was divided into four parts by the Analyst because of its length, and with the load the Court received it was determined would be delayed.
My case was indeed lengthy, 79 pages, pressing the legal limit which in no way, shape or form is recommended and was supplemented with another 3 pages Emergency Application.
In reference to the Court new statute as it pertains to this- ‘ Miscellaneous orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled Order List will continue to be posted on the Court’s web site (http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orders.aspx) immediately following their release by the Court. Miscellaneous orders will continue to be posted on the Website the day of issuance or the next day in the instance of some emergency applications. The change in practice will go into effect on Tuesday, September 25th, 2012.’ ‘Otherwise, all orders coming out of that Conference will be released next Monday at 9:30am. ‘
The courtesy call from the anonymous source seemed to be directed at the ‘fall out’ that would also be determined publically. According to a new procedure which is just this Session being implemented that I commented upon in a previous blog, was directed for this exact circumstance, workload for the Court and length of the petition.
I was actually very impressed with this because of the understanding that my petition was in fact being dissected piece by piece by the Court and wasn’t summarily being trashed dead on arrival.
Many people have pinned the United States Supreme Court Justices down regarding ‘cases to be watched’ or those with ‘more merit’ based on the Court’s recommendation that the Respondent actually file a response, however this case does not represent the norm of cases filed with the Court because of the deadline factor of the General Election, which most cases do not have.
I shall also note here that a rather unprecedented thing happened I think causing a little consternation with this particular case. The very unprecedented and unusual factor is that in this case Obama and his Counsel basically snubbed the Court in which Judge Malihi denied a Motion to Quash and almost simultaneously acted in Obama’s best defense.
In most cases this would have led to a grant of contempt or default against Obama, but in this case Judge Malihi reached outside the Court for a decision and acted as Obama’s best defense allowing Obama’s contempt in not showing up to Court, clearly providing a flood of catastrophe for not only justice, but the illusion of justice so far away from jurisprudence. The theory of Justice would be to have a Judge deciding against two arguments. In this case, Obama or his Counsel refused to attend but were favored, clearly making the Judge Obama’s best defense. - (bold emphasis added in the above two paragraphs)
The new statute for releasing the status for cases ‘delayed’ or ‘dismissed’ is for the following Monday, so again we are put in the ship of possibility."
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
View the complete post at:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/stil...76-still-alive
Obama State Ballot Challenge 2012
GeorgeM
9/26/2012
Excerpt:
[I]Being “dissected.” For euthanasia? After watching Roberts cynically change his vote and destroy the opposition to unconstitutional Obamacare, I don’t trust him as far as I could throw him. Is he intending to overturn Minor v Happersett, or weasel around it (Obamacare is a TAX, idiots)? Or will he really address this case properly? Pray on, gang. Our fate may be in the hands of fools– again.
FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE:
As Seen on: http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2012/09...scotus-12.html
BACK IN THE SHIP OF DELAY WILL SCOTUS 12-5276 JUDY V. OBAMA COME OUT UNSCATHED?
According to a phone call I received today, from a source I cannot disclose but to say it was credible, my case in the United States Supreme Court JUDY v. OBAMA Case No. 12-5276 was delayed. My case was divided into four parts by the Analyst because of its length, and with the load the Court received it was determined would be delayed.
My case was indeed lengthy, 79 pages, pressing the legal limit which in no way, shape or form is recommended and was supplemented with another 3 pages Emergency Application.
In reference to the Court new statute as it pertains to this- ‘ Miscellaneous orders may be issued in individual cases at any time. Scheduled Order List will continue to be posted on the Court’s web site (http://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/orders.aspx) immediately following their release by the Court. Miscellaneous orders will continue to be posted on the Website the day of issuance or the next day in the instance of some emergency applications. The change in practice will go into effect on Tuesday, September 25th, 2012.’ ‘Otherwise, all orders coming out of that Conference will be released next Monday at 9:30am. ‘
The courtesy call from the anonymous source seemed to be directed at the ‘fall out’ that would also be determined publically. According to a new procedure which is just this Session being implemented that I commented upon in a previous blog, was directed for this exact circumstance, workload for the Court and length of the petition.
I was actually very impressed with this because of the understanding that my petition was in fact being dissected piece by piece by the Court and wasn’t summarily being trashed dead on arrival.
Many people have pinned the United States Supreme Court Justices down regarding ‘cases to be watched’ or those with ‘more merit’ based on the Court’s recommendation that the Respondent actually file a response, however this case does not represent the norm of cases filed with the Court because of the deadline factor of the General Election, which most cases do not have.
I shall also note here that a rather unprecedented thing happened I think causing a little consternation with this particular case. The very unprecedented and unusual factor is that in this case Obama and his Counsel basically snubbed the Court in which Judge Malihi denied a Motion to Quash and almost simultaneously acted in Obama’s best defense.
In most cases this would have led to a grant of contempt or default against Obama, but in this case Judge Malihi reached outside the Court for a decision and acted as Obama’s best defense allowing Obama’s contempt in not showing up to Court, clearly providing a flood of catastrophe for not only justice, but the illusion of justice so far away from jurisprudence. The theory of Justice would be to have a Judge deciding against two arguments. In this case, Obama or his Counsel refused to attend but were favored, clearly making the Judge Obama’s best defense. - (bold emphasis added in the above two paragraphs)
The new statute for releasing the status for cases ‘delayed’ or ‘dismissed’ is for the following Monday, so again we are put in the ship of possibility."
Cody Robert Judy
www.codyjudy.us
www.codyjudy.blogspot.com
YouTube: CODE4PRES
View the complete post at:
http://obamaballotchallenge.com/stil...76-still-alive