Tweet
Is Obama Guilty of Identity Fraud Rather than Ineligibility?
DO MISSING RECORDS, HAWAII’S STONEWALLING AND INCONSISTENCIES POINT TO A DIFFERENT LIFE STORY?
The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
1/22/2012
Excerpt:
"On January 26, 2012, an administrative hearing will be held at 9:00 a.m. in Atlanta, GA, regarding the constitutional eligibility of one “Barack Hussein Obama” to determine whether or not his name should be placed on that state’s ballot for the 2012 presidential election.
But is identity fraud, rather than ineligibility, the actual crime?
Recently Atty. Orly Taitz, one of three attorneys bringing ballot challenges on the 26th, has been informed in an email that the courtroom has been changed in order to provide “better multimedia equipment for your convenience.” The mainstream media has begun to cover the upcoming hearing challenging Obama’s eligibility, and a citizen video urges concerned citizens to attend.
What will be the consequences if Obama does not appear?
Atty. Mario Apuzzo responded to the question (@Lucas Daniel Smith's Blog):
http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/b...ercussions-co/
"…The subpoena issued to Obama comes from an administrative court rather than a law court. A court-issued subpoena has the authority of a court order whether it comes from a law court or an administrative one.
Obama just happens to be the President now and would have to take time out of his official schedule to honor the subpoena. Nevertheless, Obama is subpoened as a private individual, not as the President.
Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena ...".
View the complete article at:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/...ineligibility/
DO MISSING RECORDS, HAWAII’S STONEWALLING AND INCONSISTENCIES POINT TO A DIFFERENT LIFE STORY?
The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
1/22/2012
Excerpt:
"On January 26, 2012, an administrative hearing will be held at 9:00 a.m. in Atlanta, GA, regarding the constitutional eligibility of one “Barack Hussein Obama” to determine whether or not his name should be placed on that state’s ballot for the 2012 presidential election.
But is identity fraud, rather than ineligibility, the actual crime?
Recently Atty. Orly Taitz, one of three attorneys bringing ballot challenges on the 26th, has been informed in an email that the courtroom has been changed in order to provide “better multimedia equipment for your convenience.” The mainstream media has begun to cover the upcoming hearing challenging Obama’s eligibility, and a citizen video urges concerned citizens to attend.
What will be the consequences if Obama does not appear?
Atty. Mario Apuzzo responded to the question (@Lucas Daniel Smith's Blog):
http://www.wasobamaborninkenya.com/b...ercussions-co/
"…The subpoena issued to Obama comes from an administrative court rather than a law court. A court-issued subpoena has the authority of a court order whether it comes from a law court or an administrative one.
Obama just happens to be the President now and would have to take time out of his official schedule to honor the subpoena. Nevertheless, Obama is subpoened as a private individual, not as the President.
Does Obama have to honor the subpoena? The only way to get out of honoring a subpoena is to have it quashed on a motion to quash. Obama tried that and it has so far failed. He can attempt to file a motion for reconsideration. But until the court changes its mind, he must honor the subpoena ...".
View the complete article at:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/01/...ineligibility/