Tweet
Thursday's Hearing
Obama Conspiracy Theories
Dr. Conspiracy
1/24/2012
Excerpt:
"Not being a lawyer, I’m not qualified to criticize Obama’s attorney Michael Jablonski; however, it seems that Jablonski is not taking the case seriously enough with his poorly-argued motion to quash the subpoena. Jablonski seems to think that he can ridicule his way through the case. While the case is ridiculous, judges, in my limited experience, are not concerned whether the litigants are cranks, but what the law says. Jablonski would do well to focus on the law and let Orly Taitz discredit herself.
Over the next few days, I will be focused on Atlanta. It’s the first genuine news story I’ve had in a long time."
WARNING: SITE NOT BIRTHER FRIENDLY!
View the complete article at:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/...sdays-hearing/
Obama Conspiracy Theories
Dr. Conspiracy
1/24/2012
Excerpt:
"Not being a lawyer, I’m not qualified to criticize Obama’s attorney Michael Jablonski; however, it seems that Jablonski is not taking the case seriously enough with his poorly-argued motion to quash the subpoena. Jablonski seems to think that he can ridicule his way through the case. While the case is ridiculous, judges, in my limited experience, are not concerned whether the litigants are cranks, but what the law says. Jablonski would do well to focus on the law and let Orly Taitz discredit herself.
Over the next few days, I will be focused on Atlanta. It’s the first genuine news story I’ve had in a long time."
WARNING: SITE NOT BIRTHER FRIENDLY!
View the complete article at:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2012/...sdays-hearing/