Major Televised Event Will Expose Obama's Ineligibility Before Electoral College Cert

[bsteadman]

Major Televised Event Will Expose Obama's Ineligibility Before Electoral College Certification?

Birther Report
12/2/2012

Carl Gallups: Major Televised Event Will Expose Obama's Ineligibility Before Electoral College Certification?

Carl Gallups of PPSimmons says he "has exclusive inside information that a surprising and potentially devastating eligibility event is scheduled to happen before the January 6th Electoral College Certification. Perhaps by the middle of December. This event most likely will be aired on national cable television and around the world exposing Obama's ineligibility. The person doing the exposing is a very important person with constitutional standing to do the exposing of the evidence against Obama."

Video

View the complete Birther Report presentation at:

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...igibility.html

[bsteadman]

Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Major Televised Event Will Expose Obama's Ineligibility Before Electoral College Certification?', which was started 12/3/2012 by 'Seizethecarp'

The thread references the 12/2/2012 Birther Report post, concerning a Carl Gallups (PPSimmons) video - http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...igibility.html

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../2965052/posts


The following is COMMENT #1, by 'Seizethecarp', in the thread:

Carl gallups has been very closely wired into Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Cold Case Posse head Mike Zullo and has interviewed Zullo extensively on numerous occasions.

If you search "Carl Gallups Mike Zullo" you will pull up all of their great video interveiws.

Therefore it is not much of a jump to expect that Gallups is teasing an upcoming Arpaio/Zullo event on "cable" (could Fox be finally getting off the dime in exasperation?) that will also include "a very important person with constitutional standing" (not sure who that would be).


The following is COMMENT #17, by 'Seizethecarp', in the thread:

“national cable television and around the world exposing Obama’s ineligibility”

Hmmm....CNN is much more “around the world” than FOX News. CNN has been much more aggressive with Barry of late with Atkisson going after Holder on Fast & Furious and also after Hillary and Barry on Benghazi.

Now that the Democrats are safely ensconced in the White House (default would be to Biden, not Romney IIRC, if Barry fails to qualify) maybe some in the MSM might want to go down in history and generate gigantic viewership IF and only IF NEW EVIDENCE can be credibly authenticated that Barry was NOT born in the US.

IMO, that is the only sort of evidence that would not produce a yawn from the MSM and public.

The new evidence of a foreign (of course Kenyan) birth would have to be strong enough that when combined with the LFBC forgery evidence, even a federal judge, such as Judge Carter, would feel compelled to order discovery in HI and to pierce the veil of the "full faith and credit" demands by HI authorities that their non-authentication of Barry's BC be accepted by all of the other states under the Constitution.


The following is COMMENT #25, by 'Seizethecarp' in the thread:

“Couldn’t have aired it 4.5 years ago or at least 4.5 months ago?”

This is why I suspect that new evidence has been verified.

Alternatively, Arpaio may have finally found a prosecutor with the stones to pronounce the LFBC to be a forgery and/or get a legitimate grand jury in a US jurisdiction to find the LFBC and also the SS registration to be a forgeries to indict and prosecute those who did the forgeries.

Of course they were agents of Barry who would need to be flipped to get to those closer to Barry. Barry was prevented from even holding the alleged LFBC by his lawyer even when a reporter (not a FOX reporter) suggested that this might help quiet inevitable claims that it was suspect.


The following is COMMENT #40, by 'Seizethecarp', in the thead:

It could also be an AZ official charged with certifying the AZ election of the AZ electors or charged with prosecuting fraudulent candidtates standing for office in AZ.

Perhaps Arpaio was able to get one of them (SOS Ken Bennett or AG Tom Horne) to closely examine the evidence of the forgeries or alternatively new evidence of foreign birth.

Bennett had to honor the HI “authentication” of the existence of a birth record of some sort in HI as sufficient to allow Barry onto the AZ ballot, but that HI authentication of HI records doesn’t explain or absolve Barry from complicity in presenting to the voting public a clear forgery.

Note that having a forged BC doesn’t prove ineligibility, so additional evidence would have to have been found, IMO.


The following is COMMENT #42, by 'Seizethecarp' in the thread:

By getting reelected Barry has revived the whole constitutional activist campaign to beat him in the courts by simply correcting all of the “errors” that caused prior cases to be rejected.

Remember how Judge Carter basically threw out Taitz and Kreep’s case in CA because it was filed a few hours after Barry was sworn in? That error is certainly simple to correct, although Taitz is still incompetent and Kreep got himself elected as a judge, IIRC.

Also, a campaign to get two congresscritters to object could be mounted if they were emboldened by some new, credible evidence that “Born in Kenya” was not just a marketing claim for a book.

[bsteadman]

CONTINUED FROM ABOVE

The following is COMMENT #72, by 'butterdezillion', in the thread:

Actually, what Onaka legally confirmed to Bennett was that the HI birth record is not legally valid. Onaka would not verify ANY of the birth facts that Bennett submitted on the application form for a letter of verification, even though Onaka did verify that those are the claims that are on the record they have. The only LAWFUL reason for him to not verify those facts is if he can’t, and the only reason he couldn’t verify them if that’s what their record claims.... is if the record itself is not valid.

Bennett’s duty was to keep Obama OFF the ballot because nobody in this country can certify that Obama is eligible. According to HI statute, that HI BC means NOTHING legally unless and until it is presented as evidence to a judicial or administrative person or body and the probative value is determined. Judicial and administrative persons and bodies are bound to the Federal Rules of Evidence.

IOW, without a court procedure, there is no way that Obama can qualify by Jan 20, 2013 as required by the 20th Amendment. And there is no way he EVER qualified for the last 4 years either.

This is all in the public record now. It is legally established. Every state SOS has been informed of this, by Attorney Larry Klayman. Every state AG has also been informed. Every one of them knows that Obama cannot qualify. If even one of them did the right thing this would blow wide open. At the very least someone with standing would take this to the Supreme Court. Congress is not an administrative or judicial body so nothing it does can resolve the issue of whether Obama qualifies - and the 20th Amendment says that the “president elect” can still fail to qualify by Jan 20th, so Constitutional QUALIFICATIONS for the Presidency fall to the only body left after Congress has certified the electoral winner: the courts.

SCOTUS is badly compromised. We saw that with John Roberts’ ruling on Obamacare. But if the legal facts are made known to the general public through the media and in a court hearing, it would be much, much harder for anybody to pretend that 2008 was anything but a coup by a foreign enemy combatant.


The following is COMMENT #75, by 'Seizethecarp', in the thread:

“Actually, what Onaka legally confirmed to Bennett was that the HI birth record is not legally valid.” - (quote from COMMENT #72, by 'butterdezillion')

That is your personal opinion. This is a legal matter. Only if your legal opinion is affirmed by a judge, state SOS or AG would your opinion become an “actual” legal fact. That has not happened. So far I have not seen even a single lawyer willing to argue in support of your opinion and lawyers will argue any side of any issue if paid enough or motivated for other reasons, but they haven’t embraced your interpretation of what “actually” happened.

What did “actually” happen, IMO (IANAL either) is that Bennett, rightly or wrongly, interpreted the HI “authentication” by Onaka to provide sufficient legal basis to establish a claim to AZ by HI that “legal records” of some kind affirm that Barry was born in HI making Barry eligible as an NBC (under the legal theory that only US soil birth matters) and Bennett honored HI’s claim under the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.

[Lucas Daniel Smith]

Thanks, Bruce! I will be following this closely!