ALL Butterdezillion's faxes referred to just her own 3 congressional representatives

[bsteadman]

Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'CRAP! CRAP! CRAP!', which was started 1/3/2013 by 'butterdezillion'

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../2974657/posts

I just found out that all the faxes I sent to the Republican members of Congress have been referred to just the 3 Congress-critters who represent me. I need everybody to contact your own Congress members and let them know that Hawaii registrar Alvin Onaka has certified to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate is not legally valid.

Bennett asked Onaka to verify, among other things, that Obama, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961, in Honolulu on Oahu to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama. According to Hawaii law, Onaka has to verify any submitted information if he can certify that the birth actually happened that way. And though Onaka verified that the claims on the White House image are claimed on the record they've got, he did not verify the truth of any of those facts. The only lawful reason for that is if the record they have is not legally valid.

You can see the documentation for all this at http://butterdezillion.files.wordpre...r-to-bauer.pdf

Two other verifications (to MDEC and to KS SOS Kris Kobach) are also consistent with a non-valid record. Onaka has been willing to say that the claims that are actually on the White House image "match" the claims on the record but is NOT willing to say that the information is "identical" or that the White House image is a "true and accurate representation of the original record on file". His refusal to verify what he was specifically asked is his confirmation that those things are NOT true. It is NOT a true and accurate representation of the original record and the information in it is NOT identical to the information in the real record. IOW, the White House image is a forgery.

Which is what affidavits by Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse commander, Mike Zullo, also say.

This fits with the 1960-64 birth index being altered to include non-valid records (which I've proven in an affidavit filed for a NE criminal case). And a bunch of other evidence too.

The long and short of it is this: Hawaii has officially certified that they cannot verify Obama's date of birth, city and island of birth, and parents' names. Those are critical to eligibility. With no legally-established birth facts, there is nobody who can certify that Obama is eligible, and every Official Certification of Nomination that Bob Bauer sent to the state SOS's to get Obama on the ballot are fraudulent at best.

IOW, every electoral vote that Obama got was the result of legally-acknowledged (by Hawaii) fraud.

We need the members of Congress to know that every electoral vote for Obama that they accept tomorrow is a vote to accept known criminal behavior.

Please help me get this word out to everybody, since the "machine" will only let me contact 3 people, and I've already done that. We need one Senator and one Representative to object to all the known-fraudulent electoral votes for Barack Obama.

[bsteadman]

The following is COMMENT #206, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

Onaka wasn’t the person making the deceiving public statements. He wasn’t the one who altered the 1960-64 birth index. Onaka has tried his level-best to stay out of this issue altogether; he’s been impossible to reach. I’ve requested stuff from him and heard nothing back. This was the first time Onaka personally was put on the witness stand, so to speak. And he was willing to contradict his own Director and show her up for a liar. That takes some guts. I was stunned that he actually did it. And when he stayed true to his guns THREE TIMES I knew there was no chance of anybody saying it was just a mistake or oversight.

The items from the request form are the only items that Onaka couldn’t possibly interpret as being requests to verify simply that those are CLAIMS on the birth certificate. Bennett’s wording allowed Onaka to interpret that as what was being requested to be verified on the letter Bennett sent, but the application is submitted in accordance with HRS 338-14.3, which specifically mentions that the existence of a birth certificate is to be verified and any other information that is to be submitted pertaining to the birth event.

And Onaka divided his verification into 2 sections - the one where he was verifying stuff from the application (where the only thing he actually verified was that they have a birth certificate) and then the section where he verifies that the claims are on the BC. He divides those sections by re-stating Obama’s name, even though that was not on Bennett’s list of additional items. That name was added to show that Onaka was starting a NEW section of verifications - the ones that simply verify that the claims are on the record.

And if you look at those claims, he is not just verifying that the content is the same content as is on the HDOH record. Dates can be formatted in a number of ways and still say the same thing (be the same “information”). But Onaka gave the information verbatim from the BC. What Bennett submitted v what Onaka verified v what’s on the WH BC:

Bennett Onaka WH BC
Parent Sig 8-7-1961 8-7-61 8-7-61
Attendant 8-8-1961 8-8-61 8-8-61
Date Filed August-8 1961 Aug 8-1961 Aug 8-1961

IOW, Onaka is giving Bennett a photocopy of what is contained on the record, not confirming that the information which Bennett submitted is correct.

Onaka would not verify the truth of ANY claim that Bennett submitted. The only lawful reason for that is if he CAN’T. And the only reason he can’t verify the truth of any claims that are on the record they have - like in this case - is if the record they have is non-valid.