Tweet
Did Obama’s Attorney File Anything with the Georgia Court?
“SUSPENDS PARTICIPATION” FROM COURT HEARING
The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
2/3/2012
Excerpts:
"Atty. Orly Taitz, who on February 1 filed a “Proposed Findings of Law and Fact” with the Office of State Administrative Hearings in Atlanta, GA following last Thursday’s hearing, told The Post & Email that evening that she does not believe that Atty. Michael Jablonski, Obama’s local counsel in Georgia, submitted anything to Judge Michael Malihi by the deadline, who on January 26 heard evidence and testimony refuting Obama’s constitutional eligibility to run for President...............................
This morning Taitz said that “nothing yet” had been received by the court from Jablonski.....................
Attorneys Mark Hatfield and Van Irion presented evidence that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution because his father was never a U.S. citizen. Both quoted from the case Minor v. Happersett, in which the court stated that there was “never any doubt” that a person born in the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents is a “natural born Citizen.”
Atty. Orly Taitz had quoted from Minor but also argued that Obama has been using a social security number not assigned to him and has presented a forgery as proof of his birth in Hawaii in 1961. She also cited the several names by which Obama has been known, including Soebarkah, Barry Soetoro, and other possible aliases as well as inconsistencies in his public life story. Taitz’s summary is 22 pages and presents the argument made by Minor as well as the main points of testimony made by six witnesses.
Judge Malihi had originally given a February 5 deadline for all of the attorneys to submit written summaries of their points of law, but advanced the date to February 1. Taitz stated that Atty. Irion had submitted a summary and sent her a courtesy copy.
Atty. Hatfield wrote a summary charging Obama with contempt of court, stating that “Defendant Obama’s behavior in failing to comply with Plaintiffs’ Notice to Produce by appearing for trial with the requested documentary and other evidence demonstrates Defendant’s contempt for this Court and for the judiciary generally…Plaintiffs hereby request that this Court certify the foregoing facts to the Superior Court of Fulton County for a determination of the appropriate action to be taken with regard to Defendant’s contemptuous conduct.”..................................
Taitz stated that court rules stipulate that all attorneys must receive a copy of the opposition’s summary(ies) and that as of 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, she had received nothing. “Unless there’s been a computer glitch,” Taitz said, “I don’t think he [Jablonski] filed anything.”
Taitz stated that she believed she had presented “the most explosive evidence showing forgery and fraud” committed by Obama on the 26th. She also told The Post & Email that it has been reported by Rachel Maddow of MSNBC that the Georgia Democrat Party intends to file a lawsuit in federal court claiming infringement to their “right of association” should Judge Malihi recommend, and Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp remove Obama’s name from the ballot.
Georgia Democrat Party Chairman Michael Berlon contends that the controversy about Obama’s eligibility is in regard to his “American citizenship” rather than whether or not he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Berlon also claims that the matter has been “thoroughly litigated.”
Some mainstream media outlets are also still reporting that the Georgia hearing was held over the issue of Obama’s citizenship when, in fact, the issue is whether or not he is a “natural born Citizen,” constitutionally eligible to serve, and whether or not there is compelling evidence that he has committed crimes, including felonies.
Some media reports correctly identified the “natural born Citizen” question, but Obama’s attorney appears to have reduced the higher qualification to that of simple “citizenship.”
View the complete article at:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/...georgia-court/
“SUSPENDS PARTICIPATION” FROM COURT HEARING
The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
2/3/2012
Excerpts:
"Atty. Orly Taitz, who on February 1 filed a “Proposed Findings of Law and Fact” with the Office of State Administrative Hearings in Atlanta, GA following last Thursday’s hearing, told The Post & Email that evening that she does not believe that Atty. Michael Jablonski, Obama’s local counsel in Georgia, submitted anything to Judge Michael Malihi by the deadline, who on January 26 heard evidence and testimony refuting Obama’s constitutional eligibility to run for President...............................
This morning Taitz said that “nothing yet” had been received by the court from Jablonski.....................
Attorneys Mark Hatfield and Van Irion presented evidence that Obama is not a “natural born Citizen” as required by Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution because his father was never a U.S. citizen. Both quoted from the case Minor v. Happersett, in which the court stated that there was “never any doubt” that a person born in the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents is a “natural born Citizen.”
Atty. Orly Taitz had quoted from Minor but also argued that Obama has been using a social security number not assigned to him and has presented a forgery as proof of his birth in Hawaii in 1961. She also cited the several names by which Obama has been known, including Soebarkah, Barry Soetoro, and other possible aliases as well as inconsistencies in his public life story. Taitz’s summary is 22 pages and presents the argument made by Minor as well as the main points of testimony made by six witnesses.
Judge Malihi had originally given a February 5 deadline for all of the attorneys to submit written summaries of their points of law, but advanced the date to February 1. Taitz stated that Atty. Irion had submitted a summary and sent her a courtesy copy.
Atty. Hatfield wrote a summary charging Obama with contempt of court, stating that “Defendant Obama’s behavior in failing to comply with Plaintiffs’ Notice to Produce by appearing for trial with the requested documentary and other evidence demonstrates Defendant’s contempt for this Court and for the judiciary generally…Plaintiffs hereby request that this Court certify the foregoing facts to the Superior Court of Fulton County for a determination of the appropriate action to be taken with regard to Defendant’s contemptuous conduct.”..................................
Taitz stated that court rules stipulate that all attorneys must receive a copy of the opposition’s summary(ies) and that as of 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, she had received nothing. “Unless there’s been a computer glitch,” Taitz said, “I don’t think he [Jablonski] filed anything.”
Taitz stated that she believed she had presented “the most explosive evidence showing forgery and fraud” committed by Obama on the 26th. She also told The Post & Email that it has been reported by Rachel Maddow of MSNBC that the Georgia Democrat Party intends to file a lawsuit in federal court claiming infringement to their “right of association” should Judge Malihi recommend, and Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp remove Obama’s name from the ballot.
Georgia Democrat Party Chairman Michael Berlon contends that the controversy about Obama’s eligibility is in regard to his “American citizenship” rather than whether or not he is an Article II “natural born Citizen.” Berlon also claims that the matter has been “thoroughly litigated.”
Some mainstream media outlets are also still reporting that the Georgia hearing was held over the issue of Obama’s citizenship when, in fact, the issue is whether or not he is a “natural born Citizen,” constitutionally eligible to serve, and whether or not there is compelling evidence that he has committed crimes, including felonies.
Some media reports correctly identified the “natural born Citizen” question, but Obama’s attorney appears to have reduced the higher qualification to that of simple “citizenship.”
View the complete article at:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/...georgia-court/