Tweet
Wire Fraud in the Land of Obama
Dr. Kate's View
©2012 drkate
1/31/2012
Excerpt:
"Write-in Presidential candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley asserts that by knowingly submitting a forged certificate of live birth and ‘long form birth certificate’ on line to the American public,
Candidate Sibley submitted a certified petition for Writs Quo Warranto and Mandamus to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, requesting a jury trial, setting forth outcomes (a) that Obama be ousted from office and/or prevented from being placed on the ballot for the 2012 presidential election, (b) a directive to the U.S. Attorney to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3332 and reveal to the Grand Jury the alleged offense of Obama, with the right of Sibley to inform in writing each and every one of the jurors of the offenses of Obama and other criminal acts of federal actors in the District of Columbia.
As with other cases of Quo Warranto seeking to compel proof of natural born citizenship, the politically-influenced Department of Justice has refused to forward any case or respond to it, just like Jablonski’s contemptuous and ill-fated attempt to go around the judiciary to quash any action against Obama."
View the complete article at:
http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/201...land-of-obama/
Dr. Kate's View
©2012 drkate
1/31/2012
Excerpt:
"Write-in Presidential candidate Montgomery Blair Sibley asserts that by knowingly submitting a forged certificate of live birth and ‘long form birth certificate’ on line to the American public,
"the “scheme” that President Obama appears to have intended is to obtain a job that he is not eligible to hold given his lack of “natural born Citizen” status. See, e.g., United States v. Granberry, 908 F.2d 278, 279 (8th Cir. 1990)
Initially, it is well-settled that the “use of the Internet for transmission of images or messages satisfies the requirement of interstate commerce.” See, e.g., United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir. 1997). Moreover, to seek to obtain public money – here the salary of the President of the United States – has been recognized as satisfying the “money” element of §1343. See, e.g., Pasquantino v. United States, 544 U.S. 349, 356-57 (2005) (recognizing that money in the public treasury is the government’s “money” for purposes of the mail fraud statute.)"
Initially, it is well-settled that the “use of the Internet for transmission of images or messages satisfies the requirement of interstate commerce.” See, e.g., United States v. Carroll, 105 F.3d 740, 742 (1st Cir. 1997). Moreover, to seek to obtain public money – here the salary of the President of the United States – has been recognized as satisfying the “money” element of §1343. See, e.g., Pasquantino v. United States, 544 U.S. 349, 356-57 (2005) (recognizing that money in the public treasury is the government’s “money” for purposes of the mail fraud statute.)"
Candidate Sibley submitted a certified petition for Writs Quo Warranto and Mandamus to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, requesting a jury trial, setting forth outcomes (a) that Obama be ousted from office and/or prevented from being placed on the ballot for the 2012 presidential election, (b) a directive to the U.S. Attorney to comply with 18 U.S.C. § 3332 and reveal to the Grand Jury the alleged offense of Obama, with the right of Sibley to inform in writing each and every one of the jurors of the offenses of Obama and other criminal acts of federal actors in the District of Columbia.
As with other cases of Quo Warranto seeking to compel proof of natural born citizenship, the politically-influenced Department of Justice has refused to forward any case or respond to it, just like Jablonski’s contemptuous and ill-fated attempt to go around the judiciary to quash any action against Obama."
View the complete article at:
http://drkatesview.wordpress.com/201...land-of-obama/