Tweet
Breaking: U.S. Supreme Court Meeting Today on Health Care/Eligibility Challenge
PURPURA V. SEBELIUS ASKS IF OBAMA WAS QUALIFIED TO SIGN THE BILL
The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
2/17/2012
Excerpts:
"The Post & Email has just learned that the U.S. Supreme Court will be conferencing today to decide whether or not to hear the case of Purpura v. Sebelius, which challenges the constitutionality of the health care bill and Obama’s eligibility to hold office.
Plaintiffs Nicholas Purpura and Donald R. Laster, Jr. call their challenge the “We the People” brief.
Purpura stated that his case is “the best one” to challenge the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed in March 2010 by the 111th Congress and signed by Obama. He had submitted a Request for Reargument to the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case on January 17, 2012.
Purpura has stated that “the reason they don’t want to take the case and why they’re most frightened is Count 6,” which claims that if Obama is not eligible to serve as President, the bill is null and void.
................................................
Purpura ... said that “Sotomayor and Kagan cannot hear this case” because of their conflict of interest, having been appointed to the court by Obama."
View the complete article at:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/...ra-v-sebelius/
PURPURA V. SEBELIUS ASKS IF OBAMA WAS QUALIFIED TO SIGN THE BILL
The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
2/17/2012
Excerpts:
"The Post & Email has just learned that the U.S. Supreme Court will be conferencing today to decide whether or not to hear the case of Purpura v. Sebelius, which challenges the constitutionality of the health care bill and Obama’s eligibility to hold office.
Plaintiffs Nicholas Purpura and Donald R. Laster, Jr. call their challenge the “We the People” brief.
Purpura stated that his case is “the best one” to challenge the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act passed in March 2010 by the 111th Congress and signed by Obama. He had submitted a Request for Reargument to the Supreme Court’s decision not to hear the case on January 17, 2012.
Purpura has stated that “the reason they don’t want to take the case and why they’re most frightened is Count 6,” which claims that if Obama is not eligible to serve as President, the bill is null and void.
................................................
Purpura ... said that “Sotomayor and Kagan cannot hear this case” because of their conflict of interest, having been appointed to the court by Obama."
View the complete article at:
http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/02/...ra-v-sebelius/