Tweet
Article II PAC Response to Orly Taitz's Continual Misrepresentations of Article II Super PAC
Birther Report
2/24/2012
Article II Super PAC Email
Excerpt:
"STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO ORLY TAITZ’S CONTINUAL MISREPRESENTATIONS OF ARTICLE II SUPER PAC AND ARTICLE II LEGAL DEFENSE FUND"
"Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund have been under relentless, irresponsible and deceitful attack by Orly Taitz and her staff, since the two entities were established late last year. Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund have until now ignored her complete mischaracterization of our work. Due to her most recent misrepresentation of facts we are compelled to set the record straight once and for all.
To make it abundantly clear Article II Super PAC is a ‘political’ entity established under the rules and guidelines of the Federal Election Commission. Furthermore, all such political entities, monthly filings of income/expenses are filed with the FEC. These reports, as required by law, are made available to the public for review at the FEC website.
As well, Article II Super PAC’s mission is clearly articulated on the homepage of our official website – http://www.art2superpac.com -
“ Article II Super PAC's overall goal is to ensure that citizens and elected officials clearly understand Article II and the definitive meaning intended by the United States of America's Founding Fathers of “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,” thereby working to create a legally-binding vetting apparatus which will ensure all presidential and vice-presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible in 2012 and future elections.”
“We are raising the needed resources to develop materials, to promote our message across the country, assisting with key state ballot challenges, continuing to assemble our legal team which include the brightest constitutional and elections law experts and so much more.”
“We are building a virtual army of patriots who will serve as our frontline of EDUCATORS. Be it hosting neighborhood “chats,” handing out educational materials, speaking engagements, writing letters to your hometown newspapers, or correcting misinformation with the FACTS in the blogosphere, Article II PAC is ready to put you to work.”
Article II Super PAC is gearing up for the 2012 general elections where we are currently working to elevate the debate about presidential qualifications from the netroots into the mainstream conversation. To accomplish this we have invested donor contributions into “live streaming” events such as last month’s Georgia Office of State Hearing’s and have recently teamed up with World Net Daily to “live stream” the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Investigation into Barack H. Obama. We will continue to seek out opportunities to “live stream” events that focus on presidential qualifications and related constitutional issues. After all, it is Article II that drives our mission and work.
Article II Legal Defense Fund is a separate legal entity from Article II Super PAC. We clearly state this at both sites, but for whatever reason Taitz nor her staff bother to read.
The Article II Legal Defense Fund serves as a fundraising platform for those citizens who wish to submit a ballot challenge in their respective states and hire attorney’s who are licensed in said states. Article II Legal Defense Fund serves as a fundraising platform and depository for said funds. Nothing more. Nothing less.
It is important for citizens and donors to understand, not every ballot challenger wishes to engage the services of Taitz. Rather, they wish to seek private counsel licensed to practice law in their respective state or an attorney from out of state who they hold confidence. The Plaintiffs in California, Florida, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and several more states chose to secure counsel they wished to work with, which is their right.
As for those citizens who have engaged Mr. Klayman’s legal services that is their prerogative and Ms. Taitz should not be casting aspersions or making assumptions about that which she has no knowledge. The plaintiffs in these various ballot challenges have exercised their right to secure counsel for whom they have confidence and respect, and they should not be subjected to the incessant diatribe and insults of a frustrated and angry Ms. Taitz.
Nevertheless, out of an abundance of caution, Article II Legal Defense Fund reached out to the FL/CA Plaintiffs on February 23, 2012 and have received the necessary assurances that Mr. Klayman is very much involved with the Ballot Challenges both in Florida and California. The fact of the matter is that Mr. Klayman is coming on board on an existing case in Florida and Ms. Taitz would be best served by not jumping to conclusions.
As to Taitz’s claim that donors who have contributed to the CA and FL efforts are being defrauded; this is an outright falsehood and irresponsible at best. However, if the donors who have contributed to either one of these efforts wish to receive their donation back we’d gladly comply. It speaks volumes that none have. Obviously they too have full faith in the lead Plaintiffs and Mr. Klayman.
Again, Article II Legal Defense Fund simply serves as a fundraising platform and depository on behalf of citizens. It is the Plaintiffs who hire counsel, manage the private attorney-client relationship, and work out their respective legal strategy."
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...ly-taitzs.html
View the original Article II Super PAC response at:
http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFile...OORLYTAITZ.pdf
Birther Report
2/24/2012
Article II Super PAC Email
Excerpt:
"STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO ORLY TAITZ’S CONTINUAL MISREPRESENTATIONS OF ARTICLE II SUPER PAC AND ARTICLE II LEGAL DEFENSE FUND"
"Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund have been under relentless, irresponsible and deceitful attack by Orly Taitz and her staff, since the two entities were established late last year. Article II Super PAC and Article II Legal Defense Fund have until now ignored her complete mischaracterization of our work. Due to her most recent misrepresentation of facts we are compelled to set the record straight once and for all.
To make it abundantly clear Article II Super PAC is a ‘political’ entity established under the rules and guidelines of the Federal Election Commission. Furthermore, all such political entities, monthly filings of income/expenses are filed with the FEC. These reports, as required by law, are made available to the public for review at the FEC website.
As well, Article II Super PAC’s mission is clearly articulated on the homepage of our official website – http://www.art2superpac.com -
“ Article II Super PAC's overall goal is to ensure that citizens and elected officials clearly understand Article II and the definitive meaning intended by the United States of America's Founding Fathers of “NATURAL BORN CITIZEN,” thereby working to create a legally-binding vetting apparatus which will ensure all presidential and vice-presidential candidates are constitutionally eligible in 2012 and future elections.”
“We are raising the needed resources to develop materials, to promote our message across the country, assisting with key state ballot challenges, continuing to assemble our legal team which include the brightest constitutional and elections law experts and so much more.”
“We are building a virtual army of patriots who will serve as our frontline of EDUCATORS. Be it hosting neighborhood “chats,” handing out educational materials, speaking engagements, writing letters to your hometown newspapers, or correcting misinformation with the FACTS in the blogosphere, Article II PAC is ready to put you to work.”
Article II Super PAC is gearing up for the 2012 general elections where we are currently working to elevate the debate about presidential qualifications from the netroots into the mainstream conversation. To accomplish this we have invested donor contributions into “live streaming” events such as last month’s Georgia Office of State Hearing’s and have recently teamed up with World Net Daily to “live stream” the Maricopa County Cold Case Posse Investigation into Barack H. Obama. We will continue to seek out opportunities to “live stream” events that focus on presidential qualifications and related constitutional issues. After all, it is Article II that drives our mission and work.
Article II Legal Defense Fund is a separate legal entity from Article II Super PAC. We clearly state this at both sites, but for whatever reason Taitz nor her staff bother to read.
The Article II Legal Defense Fund serves as a fundraising platform for those citizens who wish to submit a ballot challenge in their respective states and hire attorney’s who are licensed in said states. Article II Legal Defense Fund serves as a fundraising platform and depository for said funds. Nothing more. Nothing less.
It is important for citizens and donors to understand, not every ballot challenger wishes to engage the services of Taitz. Rather, they wish to seek private counsel licensed to practice law in their respective state or an attorney from out of state who they hold confidence. The Plaintiffs in California, Florida, Georgia, Arizona, Pennsylvania and several more states chose to secure counsel they wished to work with, which is their right.
As for those citizens who have engaged Mr. Klayman’s legal services that is their prerogative and Ms. Taitz should not be casting aspersions or making assumptions about that which she has no knowledge. The plaintiffs in these various ballot challenges have exercised their right to secure counsel for whom they have confidence and respect, and they should not be subjected to the incessant diatribe and insults of a frustrated and angry Ms. Taitz.
Nevertheless, out of an abundance of caution, Article II Legal Defense Fund reached out to the FL/CA Plaintiffs on February 23, 2012 and have received the necessary assurances that Mr. Klayman is very much involved with the Ballot Challenges both in Florida and California. The fact of the matter is that Mr. Klayman is coming on board on an existing case in Florida and Ms. Taitz would be best served by not jumping to conclusions.
As to Taitz’s claim that donors who have contributed to the CA and FL efforts are being defrauded; this is an outright falsehood and irresponsible at best. However, if the donors who have contributed to either one of these efforts wish to receive their donation back we’d gladly comply. It speaks volumes that none have. Obviously they too have full faith in the lead Plaintiffs and Mr. Klayman.
Again, Article II Legal Defense Fund simply serves as a fundraising platform and depository on behalf of citizens. It is the Plaintiffs who hire counsel, manage the private attorney-client relationship, and work out their respective legal strategy."
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...ly-taitzs.html
View the original Article II Super PAC response at:
http://www.art2superpac.com/UserFile...OORLYTAITZ.pdf
Comment