DISMISSED: Sunahara v. Hawaii Department of Health, The Fraud & Deception Continues

[bsteadman]

THE FRAUD AND DECEPTION CONTINUES!...

Give Us Liberty
3/8/2012

Reposted from:

BREAKING! SUNAHARA V. HDOH DISMISSED

Birther Summit
Dean C. Haskins © 2012
3/8/2012

"I just received this message by email from Gerald Kurashima:

I just got out of the hearing. Unfortunately, the Judge ruled in favor of the State and effectively dismissed the Complaint.

The Judge treated this as a motion for summary judgment because the Judge considered matters outside the pleadings. However, the Judge did not give any reason or explanation for the ruling but just granted it in favor of the State.

We had a long discussion about HRS 338-13(a), and the Judge may have ruled that the statute provides for various forms of either a certified copy of a certificate, or contents, or any part thereof. The Court may have decided that the Director has the sole discretion as to the form of certificate it provides, but again there was no explanation given.

The State is going to prepare the Order then it will be filed. At that point there will be thirty (30) days to appeal the Judge's decision.
We will be discussing these results with him to determine what he believes Duncan's next step should be. Personally, I believe that this could be the result of the immense poisoning of vexatious and incompetent litigation that has plagued the Hawaiian court system, as this case should have been very easily won--if nothing but the law were considered. What other motivation could a state have for denying someone a photocopy of his deceased sister's original birth certificate? Developing"

View the Give Us Liberty presentation at:

http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.co...continues.html

View the complete Birther Summit presentation at:

http://www.birthersummit.org/news/91...dismissed.html

[bsteadman]

Free Republic is running a thread titled, "BREAKING! SUNAHARA V. HDOH DISMISSED", which was started 3/8/2012 by 'Brown Deer'

The thread references an article posted on 'Give Us Liberty', which was a repost of an original article by Dean C. Haskins on 'Birther Summit'

The following is COMMENT #41 by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

"I think it’s very similar to Georgia: the case could be appealed to the state Supreme Court, but they’re not going to rule against Obama. And they all know this is about Obama.

It’s more blatant - because there’s no interpretation necessary to know that no burden of proof is met when no evidence is presented, and that a document not forbidden for release has to be disclosed as allowed by law - but the judiciary has been wiping its bottom on the rule of law on the eligibility issue from Day One. And as long as the judiciary is willing to ignore the law, there’s nothing we can do about it within the legal system. At least not in time for this issue.

That’s why this has always been about the rule of law and not about Obama at all. If judges are able to ignore laws, procedures, precedents, etc, then ANYTHING could be ruled. If bureaucrats are able to make up whatever rules they want, ignore any rules they want, alter records at will, lie at will (as Holder wants government to be able to do in response to records requests), destroy records that are required to be stored permanently, refuse to look the right place for documents they have, and refuse to answer questions, requests, subpoenas, etc, then there is no assurance that ANY records or processes are genuine."

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../2856546/posts