Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lord Monckton on Obama’s computer-generated “Birth certificate”

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Lord Monckton on Obama’s computer-generated “Birth certificate”

    Lord Monckton on Obama’s computer-generated “Birth certificate”

    Stop The ACLU

    JonJayRay
    3/14/2012

    Received from Lord Monckton via Email

    "I have watched Sheriff Arpaio’s press conference in AZ and have examined some of the evidence directly. It is clear – as Alex Jones rightly said on the day when Obama first put up his faked “long-form birth certificate” on the White House website – that a fraud has been committed, and that, absent a valid official record of Obama’s birth or a very good explanation of the anomalies in the published version, he is not qualified to stand for re-election as President.

    The main point of the fraudulent “birth certificate” is that it is layered in such a way that all four of the rubber stamps (three dates and one recording officer’s certification) are on separate layers, allowing them to be moved about on the document at will. A scanned document could not behave this way, and there is no way this could have happened accidentally. However, Sheriff Arpaio has some reason to fear that the Hawaiian authorities are in Obama’s pocket.

    There are two other pieces of impressive testimony. First, when the Sheriff’s office asked the National Archives to produce the immigration records of flights into the US, and specifically into Hawaii, for five years either side of Obama’s alleged birth date (4 August 1961), the one week in 1961 in which the records were unavailable was the week of — you guessed it – 1-7 August. This is beginning to look like a widespread, high-level fraud.

    Secondly, the White House had previously told enquirers from the media that no long-form birth certificate existed: all they had was a certification from Hawaii that there was a birth certificate on file.

    The Sheriff plainly has enough evidence to warrant further investigation by the appropriate authorities (presumably the FBI), but he seems to be genuinely terrified of how far the corruption might have spread, and does not seem to know where to go or what to do next. A lawyer whom I have consulted says that no public authority or court will move against a sitting president who has been elected, but it seems to me that the evidence of malfeasance is now strong enough to overcome this objection.
    "


    Received via email

    Posted by John J. Ray (M.A.; Ph.D.)


    View the complete post at:

    http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2012/03/1...h-certificate/
    B. Steadman
Working...
X