INS Doc: U.S. Certificate Issued to One East African-Born Child of U.S. Citizen, 1961

[bsteadman]

INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!

The Daily Pen
Dan Crosby
3/23/2012

Excerpt:

"IMPLICATIVE DISCOVERY: A government document found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive bolsters a growing mountain of evidentiary data against Barack Obama’s constitutional eligibility to be president. The document indicates that a consular officer issued a single certificate of statutory citizenship, within the time frame including August 4, 1961, to a child born to a U.S. citizen between July 1st and December 31st, 1961 in the Kenyan region of Africa. The record also reveals that the certificate was the only one issued for this specific type of arrival in the U.S. over a span of more than 18 months, among thousands from other parts of the world."


"NEW YORK, NY – A recently discovered rare immigration record found by researchers working on behalf of an ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama to hold the office of the U.S. presidency reveals that an American consular officer issued a single Certificate of Citizenship to only one passenger arriving in the U.S. from the Kenyan region of Africa between July and December of 1961.

The record shows demographic and status classifications for a passenger who was explicitly recorded at the INS Arrival Inspection Station as an individual being born to a U.S. citizen parent arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st and December 31st, 1961.

This information and the dates of its documentation are disturbing given the rare nature of the issuance of certificates of citizenship for children who acquire their citizenship by birth to incoming U.S. citizens in this particular region of Africa.

These dates not only align with the alleged date of Obama’s birth on August 4, 1961, but also with evidence indicating that Ann Dunham departed from Hawaii beginning in February, 1961, shortly after her undocumented marriage to Obama Sr.

Also supported by this data is the implication of an African trip by the absence of Dunham’s passport information which is known to have existed from the 1960s which was used in at least one occasion for her departure with Obama Jr. to Indonesia where the two lived with Lolo Soetoro, Dunham’s second husband. If Dunham had filed for a “renewal” of an old passport, rather than for a new passport in the mid 1960’s for the Indonesian trip, which would have been the common practice for the life of a passport, this would have been indicated on the missing application which would have been included with the series of documents released by an FOIA request in early 2010."
..............................................

View the complete report at:

http://thedailypen.blogspot.com/2012...issued-to.html

[bsteadman]

Free Republic is running a thread titled, "INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!", which was started 3/24/2012 by 'Red Steel'

The thread references the 3/23/2012 article on 'The Daily Pen', having the same title, which was written by Dan Crosby.

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../2863198/posts

---

The following is COMMENT #129, by 'Seizethecarp', in the thread:


“A COC (Certificate of Citizenship) is also considered a primary form of identification by the State of Hawaii in 1961 to prove a foreign born infant’s residency in the U.S. prompting the issuance of a standard Certificate of Live Birth under Hawaii Revised Statute 338-17 which would then allocate the location of the birth to the mother’s residence.”

Once again the attempt to find exculpatory documentary evidence in support of Barry NOT being born in Kenya FAILS.

If underage Stanley Ann was unable to prove marriage after a birth in Kenya (or if the bigamy was known in Kenya) Barry would have QUALIFIED as a citizen at birth because SADO would have met the residency requirement for an out-of-wedlock birth mom.

SADO might even have first tried to obtain UK Kenyan citizenship in Kenya for Barry but been rebuffed due to the bigamy...leaving US nationality and/or citizenship as her recourse in her legally unmarried status.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...States_citizen

“A person's record of birth abroad, if registered with a U.S. consulate or embassy, is proof of citizenship. Such a person may also apply for a passport or a Certificate of Citizenship to have a record of citizenship. Such documentation is often useful to prove citizenship in lieu of the availability of an American birth certificate.”

“For persons born between December 24, 1952 and November 14, 1986, a person is a U.S. citizen if all of the following are true (except if born out-of-wedlock)[8]:

1.The person's parents were married at the time of birth
2.One of the person's parents was a U.S. citizen when the person was born
3.The citizen parent lived at least ten years in the United States before the child's birth;
4.A minimum of 5 of these 10 years in the United States were after the citizen parent's 14th birthday.

“For persons born out-of-wedlock (mother) if all the following apply:
1.the mother was a U.S. citizen at the time of the person’s birth and
2.the mother was physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year prior to the person’s birth.[9] (See link for those born to a U.S. father out-of-wedlock)”


The following is COMMENT #158, by 'Seizethecarp' in the thread:


“Did Madelyn Dunham and or Stanley Armour accompany her daughter on this trip? Methinks its possible...” (from COMMENT #148, by 'rolling_stone', in the thread)

These INS reports seem to exclude that. There were only three US citizens who came in from Kenya in the time frame, but two were with the Mboya airlift according to the caption below the photo of the page showing the 3 US citizens entering from Kenya.

“The previous year’s INS report shows that no other Certificates of Derived Citizenry by birth were issued to anyone arriving from the Kenyan region of Africa between July 1st, 1960 and June 30th, 1961. During this time, the INS recorded 282 alien arrivals from Kenya by air, and three U.S. citizens.” (from COMMENT #148, by 'rolling_stone', in the thread)

If two of the three US citizens were on the Mboya airlift then that lease just US citizen slot...for Stanley Ann with baby Barry listed as an “alien” pending inspection and issuance of a COC???

[bsteadman]

Conclusions and Speculations After Examining the 3/23/2012 Article on The Daily Pen

Conclusions and Speculations after evaluating the 3/23/2012 article by Dan Crosby on The Daily Pen titled, "INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961"!

The new facts released in the Daily Pen article do not in any way detract from my scenario of a return BOAC air trip from Kenya to Seattle by Ann Dunham and BHO-II via London and Vancouver in mid to late August 1961.

The BOAC World Air Routes map, published April 24, 1960, is linked below:

http://www.timetableimages.com/ttima...60/ba60-13.jpg

The facts do NOT support their return trip by air to the USA via London, New York and San Francisco, except with some difficulty and required explanation by the author of the article.

The facts released indicate that neither BHO Sr. nor either of Ann's parents were likely present at the birth of BHO-II at the CPGH in Mombasa.

The data showing that a COC (Certificate of Citizenship) was granted for one (1) alien during the time period, July 1, 1961 to December 31, 1961, embarking from a very large area in Africa, though not strong, DOES at least support the POSSIBILITY that BHO-II was born in Kenya.

A proposed timeline is presented, which shows the major events occurring during the time period surrounding the birth of BHO-II

---

http://archive.org/stream/annualrepo...ge/99/mode/1up

TABLE 32. PERSONS DEPARTED FROM THE UNITED STATES, BY SEA AND AIR, TO FOREIGN COUNTRIES, BY COUNTRY OF DEBARKATION, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1962 (Cont’d) {Exclusive of Canadian travel over land borders}

Country of Debarkation: Kenya:

• BY SEA -- Shows 3 ‘aliens’ and 60 ‘citizens’
• BY AIR –- Shows 0 ‘aliens’ and 0 ‘citizens’

TABLE 31. PERSONS ARRIVED IN THE UNITED STATES, BY SEA AND AIR, FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES, BY COUNTRY OF EMBARKATION, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1962 (Cont’d) {Exclusive of Canadian travel over land borders}

Country of Embarkation: Kenya:
....... BY AIR -- Shows 1 ‘alien’ and 0 ‘citizen’

Conclusion: This one (1) ‘alien’ MIGHT (?) be BHO-II, but I rather doubt it. The data do not show any ‘citizen’ (mother) accompanying the ‘alien'. The article attempts to explain this fact away, but I have my doubts. Entry to the USA from Vancouver, over the Canadian Border, seems much more logical and likely.

However, the 0 ‘citizens’ and 0 'aliens' (Debarkation via Air to Kenya) figure gives a strong signal that neither BHO-Sr nor parent of Ann were present with her at the birth of BHO-II. These Honolulu-based individuals would most likely have traveled via Air both ways and would have traveled BOAC to and from Kenya via San Francisco, New York, and London. Since 0 citizens and 0 aliens show on the Debarkation to Kenya, I conclude these potential travelers were not present at the birth.

---

http://archive.org/stream/annualrepo...ge/19/mode/1up

Page 20, TABLE 3. ALIENS AND CITIZENS ADMITTED AT UNITED STATES PORTS OF ENTRY, YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1961 – 1962

Note that in the fiscal year ended June 30, 1962 that 26,628,601 ‘citizens’ and 30,778,071 ‘aliens’ were admitted to the USA from across the Canadian Border.

---

http://archive.org/stream/annualrepo...ge/14/mode/1up

Page 99, TABLE 48, CERTIFICATE OF CITIZENSHIP GRANTED TO PERSONS WHO DERIVED CITIZENSHIP AT BIRTH ABROAD, BY COUNTRY OR REGION OF BIRTH AND YEAR ACQUIRED, YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1962

The continent of AFRICA is subdivided in the chart to the following regions: Libya, Morroco, South Africa, United Arab Republic (Egypt), and ‘Other Africa’ The table shows 1 individual who was granted a COC from the ‘Other Africa’ region for Calendar Year Acquired: 1961.

Based on the information in the article, the researchers examined a similar chart for the Year ended June 30, 1961 and observed that 0 individuals from this same region were granted COCs between January 1, 1961 and June 30, 1961. Therefore, by subtraction, it was determined that one (1) individual from this region was granted a COC in the time period July 30, 1961 to December 31, 1961. This might indeed be BHO-II, but the argument for it is not very strong, since the 'Other Africa' designation for the origin of the individual is extremely broad.

However, and importantly, the data does NOT rule out that BHO-II COULD have been granted a COC during this time period.

On brief searching of the referenced pages, I could not locate the chart for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1961 but I assume that the information presented is correct.

---

I believe the data presented in the article, with key portions cited above, support the following nativity timeline covering the birth of BHO-II at the CPGH in Mombasa, Kenya on August 4, 1961. Furthermore, I believe this to be the most logical and correct explanation for all the events that transpired during this time period:

• Early November 1960: Ann Dunham becomes pregnant while a student at the University of Hawaii.
• February 2, 1961: Ann Dunham, now about 3 months pregnant, and BHO Sr. the claimed bio father, allegedly are married on Maui.
• Sometime in the approximate time period 2/2/1961 (marriage date) and 4/10/1961 (INS memo date): Ann and BHO Sr. attempt to make arrangements with the Salvation Army in Hawaii for the baby to be placed for adoption. (http://www.wnd.com/2011/11/365749/) Apparently, the attempt to place the baby up for adoption in Hawaii was not successful.
• Sometime in the approximate time period, March 1961 to April 1961: Ann, pregnant and now embarrassingly starting to show it, departs ALONE from Hawaii, via passenger cruise SHIP, and slowly heads across the ocean toward Kenya, with the intent of giving the baby to the Kenyan relatives of BHO Sr. for adoption. An extended sea voyage by Ann to Kenya, starting in the Spring of 1961, would help explain why there have not been any photos of her, while pregnant in Hawaii, publicly released.
• August 4, 1961: BHO-II is born at the CPGH in Mombasa. Neither BHO Sr nor either one of Ann's parents are present at the birth. BHO Sr's relatives choose not to adopt BHO-II so Ann had no choice but to return with him to the USA. It is also possible, but less likely that Ann, feeling very maternal after the birth, decides to forget about any pre-arranged adoption with the relatives and chooses to keep her new baby son. However, there has been some unconfirmed reports that Ann was trying to fly back to the USA from the Nairobi airport but delayed too long and was refused permission to travel by the airline. According to the report, she was then transported to Mombasa by an American Christian Missionary, for delivery of the baby. If it was pre-arranged with BHO Sr's relatives for them to adopt the child, it is not likely she would have been trying to fly back to the USA prior to the birth of BHO-II!
• Mid to late August, 1961: Ann, BHO-II and possibly the American Christian Missionary who may have accompanied them, depart from Nariobi, Kenya and fly, via BOAC, first to London, and then to Vancouver, Canada.
• Mid to late August, 1961 Ann and BHO-II, possibly still accompanied by the American Christian Missionary, travel the approximate 141 miles via ground transportation from Vancouver to Seattle, Washington, where Ann starts night school extension courses at the University of Washington for the Fall 1961 Semester.

[bsteadman]

Update: Pen Johannson, Who Are You?

AND WHO IS “DAN CROSBY?”

The Post & Email
Sharon Rondeau
3/24/2012

Excerpt:

"Several readers have brought to the attention of The Post & Email a blog entry dated March 23, 2012 by “The Daily Pen” which claims to have “found buried in the online reference section of a Boston Public Library archive” a “single certificate [...]"

View the complete article at:
Subscription Required

http://www.thepostemail.com/2012/03/...n-who-are-you/

[bsteadman]

The following is an excerpt from COMMENT #320, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

"..... There were state statistics that the HDOH was responsible to compile. Incidentally, a colleague requested to see those and was told they were not available to the public, IIRC.

The HDOH tried to claim to me that the original birth index (VR-1) that was required to be permanently retained was actually these IBM punchcards that they used for tabulation purposes, and that they were destroyed because they weren’t needed once the records were computerized. IOW, they are claiming that the only record they had of where the actual BC’s were located was IBM punchcards. At least that’s how I remember it. I’ve tried to find that e-mail but my computer has been hit and I’ve had to switch to a different computer so many times that my records are all over the place and that particular e-mail is in a zip file within a DBX file that I can’t either open or unzip.

Regarding BC’s based on affidavits, the inspector general for the HHS issued a report saying that home births or BC’s given on the basis of affidavits are the especially vulnerable spot in our records keeping, because a person can lie about anything in an affidavit.

The HDOH claimed to Lori Starfelt (or at least Starfelt claimed that they did) that if it’s an unattended birth the mother and baby have to be examined by a doctor who then signs the BC. The CDC classified its “unattended births” by those who didn’t have a doctor’s signature, IIRC - so that even if the birth happened outside the hospital with nobody there it would be considered an “attended birth” if it had a doctor’s signature - which the HDOh told Starfelt they had to have. I’m not sure what it means, then, that HI had some unattended births according to the CDC’s 1961 report.

Maybe it means that those BC’s were accepted on the basis of affidavits rather than a doctor’s signature within 30 days (which is what the HDOH rules gave as a timeframe for when BC’s had to be fully completed without being considered “delayed”).

All things considered, it does make my eyebrow go up to realize that former OIP Director Paul Tsukiyama affirmed the HDOH’s DENIAL OF ACCESS to Miss Tickly’s request for affidavits filed in support of any birth certificate for Obama. Tsukiyama literally wrote the book on the rules for responding to UIPA requests and knows that if the records don’t exist they have to say so. His affirmation of the denial of access is a strong statement that Obama’s BC (if there is one) relies on affidavits rather than a doctor’s signature on a BC filed within 30 days of the birth.

And that fits right in with Fukino’s statement in an interview that Obama’s birth record is half-typed, half-handwritten. It also fits what Abercrombie said about not being to find anything in the hospitals and about something being “actually written down” that would not convince any skeptics.

If such a thing happened, it would explain why Obama’s people had to forge both a long-form AND THE COLB: even though a COLB wouldn’t give the doctor’s name, the BC# would have an L in front of it (for “late”), and the BC would have to say on its face what affidavits were used to support the claims, and when they were filed. Such a BC is not considered prima facie evidence.

And the key here is that such a BC would only be necessary if neither Ann nor Obama were seen by a Hawaii doctor within the first 30 days after birth. Which also fits the scenario of Ann being in Seattle so soon. If she had been in HI anytime in August 1961 (as Abercrombie has claimed) she could have claimed the baby was born at home, had a doctor examine her and the baby within 30 days and sign the BC, and we could have a foreign-born POTUS that nobody could prove otherwise. The mother’s residency needn’t have had anything to do with it.

A poster here on FR is from HI and says he saw people come into Hawaii with their babies and get BC’s in this way. Which leads me to believe that HI must have been very lax with their standards, probably so that they could meet the number of citizens required for statehood (and then later perhaps to get more federal funding). I wish I could remember that person’s handle."

(bold and underline emphasis added)