The Democrats’ Real Strategy in Launching Recounts -- The Daily Trump, Richard Baehr

[bsteadman]

The Democrats’ Real Strategy in Launching Recounts

The Daily Trump
by Richard Baehr
11/28/2016

Excerpt:

By Richard Baehr — The recount in Wisconsin, and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of the states. No recount ever changes thousands of votes. I do not think that is the purpose.

The recounts, if done by hand, which can be demanded, may take longer than the last day for completing the official counts in a state and directing Electoral College voters. If all 3 states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232. No one hits 270.

Then this goes to Congress, where the House voting 1 vote per state elects Trump, and Senate selects Pence. This would be first the time this happened since 1824, but in that case, John Quincy Adams won in the House, though he had fewer electoral college votes than Andrew Jackson.

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it? The answer is to make Trump seem even more illegitimate, that he did not win the popular vote (he lost by over 2.1 million), he did not win the Electoral College (did not reach 270), and was elected by being inserted into the presidency by members of his own party in Congress.
................................................

View the complete post, including link, tweets and image, at:

http://thedailytrump.org/trump-recounts/

[bsteadman]

Why the Progressives Want a Recount They Know They Will Lose

If after all the devious machinations Trump still wins this will be used by the Sandernistas and the Clintonites to cry rigged system

Canada Free Press
by Dr. Robert R. Owens
12/1/2016

Excerpt:

The recount in Wisconsin and the coming ones in Michigan and Pennsylvania will not change the outcomes in any of those states.  Even though the party of Mayor Daley, Boss Tweed, and their big city machines are famous for winning recounts by finding bags of votes in candy store basements no recount has ever changed thousands of votes let alone tens of thousands.  I do not believe changing the outcome is the purpose. It is instead changing the perception of it.

I predict that they will demand the recounts are done by hand. This would make them take so long these three pivotal States would not certify their results by the last day possible for directing their Electors how to vote.  If all three states miss the deadline, Trump is at 260, Hillary at 232.  No one hits 270.  

This is Hillary and the Progressives strategy to place the mantel of corrupt elite insiders on the Republicans

Then, according to the Constitution, the election would go to Congress. The House votes with one vote per State. The Republican House would then elect Donald Trump as the 45th president. The Republican Senate would elect Pence Vice President.

This has happened before. In 1824, though Andrew Jackson had more popular votes and more electoral votes John Quincy Adams won in the House. President Adams made a deal with the Speaker of the House Henry Clay who Adams then named as his Secretary of State, which at the time was considered the stepping stone to the presidency. This was immediately termed the Corrupt Bargain by supporters of Jackson. The antagonistic presidential race of 1828 began practically before Adams took office. To the Jacksonians the Adams-Clay alliance symbolized a corrupt system where elite insiders pursued their own interests without heeding the will of the people.

This is Hillary and the Progressives strategy to place the mantel of corrupt elite insiders on the Republicans now that they see the nation is incensed against the circle of Progressive power brokers who led us from the pinnacle of prosperity to the brink of bankruptcy. This is akin to how the Democrats have successfully placed the mantel of racist on the party of Lincoln and the Emancipation Proclamation. What a masterful stroke of political maneuvering that convinced the descendants of slaves that their natural allies are the descendants of Jim Crow.

If this goes to the US House and Senate, and the result is the same as the result from the Electoral College without the recounts, why do it?  The answer is to make Trump seem completely illegitimate. They and their obedient shills in the media will tell us every day and at every opportunity that Trump did not win the popular vote saying he lost by over 2.1 million ignoring the fact that millions of illegals voted. He did not win the Electoral College since in this scenario he would not have attained 270. They will say just as they did about Bush the Younger that he was not elected he was selected by members of his own party in Congress.

However, there is one wrinkle in this strategy. If a state never gets to name electors, the number needed to win does not remain the 270 needed if every state names every elector. In that case it would once again be a majority of those named. Even with 260-232, Trump would still win. Then again the thugs on the left are sending death threats to electors already named trying to frighten some of them into becoming faithless electors who do not vote as instructed by their States. I don’t foresee this happening. The number of faithless electors in American History doesn’t make a handful.
..................................................

View the complete article, including image, at:

http://canadafreepress.com/article/w...they-will-lose

[bsteadman]

How to Steal an Election, 2016 Style

We the People of the United States
by Miri
12/5/2016

Excerpt:

How to steal an election in 15 easy steps:

1. Concede the election, but only to catch the winning opponent off guard so that he and his millions of supporters think that it’s in the bag, and so they don’t prepare for recounts, lawsuits, or ballot challenges.

2. Plan a bunch of cutesy photo ops–little, heart-warming vignettes–designed to ensure that you’re photographed with disappointed-but-still-adoring young female fans. Such a shame that you didn’t win. Ensure that the media reports that you’re upbeat and that you’ve (allegedly) bounced back from your disappointment. No hard feelings here. She’s a trooper.

3. Allow your people to continue to “quietly take a number of steps” to contest the election, even though you’ve already conceded the election and even though they began to take these steps nearly as soon as you conceded. (Steps included having “lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies that would suggest a hacked result;” having “numerous meetings and calls with various outside experts;” and having lawyers analyze “laws and practices as they pertain to recounts, contests and audits.”)

4. Sit “innocently” by while another of your erstwhile opponents, one who had no chance of winning the election, begins to fund raise for recounts in only three of the fifty states (“coincidentally the same three identified in the quiet steps your people took), under the guise of wanting to ensure free and fair elections and making sure every vote counts, without fraud or hacking muddying the waters. Pretend there was and is no collusion, even though it’s admitted to be a “multi-partisan effort” and even though both campaigns use the same language, same strategies, and same information.

.................................................. .............................

View the complete post at:

https://wtpotus.wordpress.com/2016/1...le/#more-22866