Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Supreme Court health care ruling draws mixed reaction locally -- The Washington Times

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Supreme Court health care ruling draws mixed reaction locally -- The Washington Times

    Supreme Court health care ruling draws mixed reaction locally

    The Washington Times

    Tom Howell Jr.
    6/28/2012

    Excerpt:

    "The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision on Thursday to uphold President Obama’s health care mandate as a tax prompted Democratic leaders in the District and Maryland, as early adopters of Mr. Obama’s vision, to rejoice while Virginia’s Republican governor denounced it as “a blow to freedom.”

    Presaged as its most significant ruling in years, the high court’s opinion on the Affordable Care Act passed in 2010 will allow the District to continue its roll-out of a virtual marketplace that allows the small percentage of uninsured city residents — and those seeking a better deal — to shop for coverage.

    While many states have challenged the legality of the law, the District joined Maryland, 10 other states and the Virgin Islands in urging the U.S. Supreme Court in January to uphold the law as constitutional.

    “We are delighted that the Court has upheld the Affordable Care Act,” said D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray, who is traveling in China. “While the District already leads in access to care, we will continue moving forward to ensure every District resident has access to quality, affordable health care.”

    Mr. Obama’s marquee law has enjoyed widespread support from leaders in the city, which is dominated by Democrats.

    Wayne Turnage, director of the D.C. Department of Healthcare Finance, said he is “ecstatic” because the ruling allows the city to carry on with its plans to provide healthcare without putting up a large amount of local dollars.

    “I am pleasantly surprised,” he said of the opinion. “That just shows the court is a lot smarter than I am.”

    In a joint statement, Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley and Lt. Gov Anthony G. Brown said the high court with its ruling “chose to protect the lives of millions of Marylanders and millions of Americans.”

    “Today’s decision gives considerable momentum to our health care reform efforts here in Maryland,” the statement said.

    Meanwhile, leaders south of the Potomac River had little to cheer about.

    “Today’s ruling is extremely disappointing for Virginia and America,” Republican Gov. Bob McDonnell said, arguing it will harm small businesses during trying economic times. “America needs market-based solutions that give patients more choice, not less.”

    Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, who filed his own federal court challenge to the health care law on behalf of Virginia, said the ruling marked “a dark day for American liberty.”

    While Virginia officials challenged the law, their counterparts in Maryland the District led the nation in its implementation.

    Mr. Gray established the city’s Health Reform Implementation Committee in early 2011 to ensure a “smooth and rapid” roll-out of the law. The city has been moving aggressively since then, so the District could begin enrollment in its healthcare exchange — a virtual marketplace of health insurance plans — by fall 2013.
    On July 10, the D.C. Council is expected to confirm Mr. Gray’s nominees for an executive board to guide the exchange.

    Mr. Obama’s reforms expanded the pool of Medicaid-eligible residents in the District, allowing adults without children and up to 200 percent of the poverty level to enroll under Medicaid. Before the ACA, childless adults could not be eligible for Medicaid without waiving provisions of the federal law."

    ............................

    View the complete article at:

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ction-locally/
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Affordable Care Act SCOTUS Decision--Live Thread', which was started 6/28/2012 by 'John W'
    The thread references comments made on 'SCOTUSblog'

    View the complete Free Republic thread at:

    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2900336/posts
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      Roberts joins left to uphold Obamacare

      Mandate to buy health insurance survives as tax

      WND

      Art Moore
      6/28/2012

      Excerpt:

      "WASHINGTON – Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. joined the left of the Supreme Court in a dramatic 5-4 decision to uphold President Obama’s signature legislation, the far-reaching health-care law that its harshest critics decry as a wedge to transform the U.S. into a socialist state.

      The court ruled that the controversial mandate, requiring citizens to buy health insurance, should be regarded as the imposition of a tax, which falls within the power of Congress.

      The ruling, announced by Roberts, allows the law to proceed with its aim of covering more than 30 million Americans purportedly in need of health insurance.

      The court’s four left-leaning justices – Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor – sided with Roberts, who was appointed to the court by President George W. Bush.

      Read the Supreme Court justices’ opinions on President Obama’s health care law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

      Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.

      ‘Dyspepsia’ in the court

      Contrary to the court’s ruling, President Obama has insisted that the individual mandate is not a tax.

      Outside the Supreme Court building, Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, got behind a microphone to declare the decision exposes the president as a liar.

      “The Supreme Court has made clear that when the president says something, you need to understand that he may be lying,” he said.

      The congressman said the ruling shows Obama will do whatever is necessary to get a bill passed.

      Rob Schenk, president of the Christian outreach ministry Faith and Action, was in the justices’ chamber when the opinion was announced.

      He said he observed “dyspepsia” in the demeanor of the justices as the ruling was read.

      Noting his familiarity with the court and the fact that he has met privately with all nine justices, he said there is “anything but harmony in that court room.”

      “It is up to the American people now to change this law,” he said.

      Schenk said Roberts’ opinion reflected the fact that it’s “not the job of this court to fix the problems of the people.”

      “The chief justice just gave a challenge to all of us,” Schenk said. “Change this law. And that is what we will do as the American people.”

      Repeal voting coming

      House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., said after the ruling that the Republican-led House will vote on repealing the health care law soon after the July 4 recess.

      “The Supreme Court’s decision to uphold Obamacare is a crushing blow to patients throughout the country,” Cantor said. “Obamacare has failed to keep the president’s basic promise of allowing those who like their health care to keep it, while increasing costs and reducing access to quality care for patients.”

      In his opinion, Roberts said the mandate could not be upheld under the Constitution’s Commerce Clause but meets constitutional muster as a tax.

      “The Affordable Care Act is constitutional in part and unconstitutional in part. The individual mandate cannot be upheld as an exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause,” Roberts wrote. “That Clause authorizes Congress to regulate interstate commerce, not to order individuals to engage it. In this case, however, it is reasonable to construe what Congress has done as increasing taxes on those who have a certain amount of income, but choose to go without health insurance. Such legislation is within Congress’s power to tax.”

      The ruling, however, curbed the expansion of Medicaid to cover millions of low-income Americans. According to the decision, Washington cannot penalize states for not participating in the new program by withholding existing Medicaid funds."

      .............................

      View the complete article at:

      http://www.wnd.com/2012/06/supreme-c...e/?cat_orig=us
      B. Steadman

      Comment

      Working...
      X