Tweet
Obama’s Primary Vote Down by 50 Percent
Give Us Liberty
James V. Lacey @ California Political Review, 1/11/2012
1/12/2012
Excerpts:
"As Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton went into the Democratic National Convention in 2008 against Barack Hussein Obama,she had received a majority of the popular vote against Obama,18,045,829 votes to 17,869,419. Still, Obama and his Chicago machine managers fairly easily wrestled away the nomination for president from her. Yet what is now more amazing,is that in the Iowa and New Hampshire primary elections this Presidential election,Obama is doing far worse in popular vote than during 2008.
True,Obama doesn’t have Hillary Clinton to run against in 2012, but isn’t it strange that not only are none of the vote totals Hillary racked-up transferring over to Obama,but even Obama voters themselves have diminished? Obama voters and other traditional Democratic voters in the early primaries seen to be scurrying away from him like “rats on a sinking ship.”
Here are some popular vote totals and comparisons:in 2008 Obama received 104,404 votes in New Hampshire,finishing second to Hillary Clinton,who had 112,404 votes. But on Tuesday in New Hampshire,Obama,with 81.54% of the vote in the Democratic primary, received only 47,220 total votes. That is less than 50% of his 2008 vote total in the Granite State,not including all the missing Hillary voters.............…
The fact is, Ron Paul even got more votes in New Hampshire this week, at 56,223,than Obama at 47,220, and Romney creamed them both with 96,773…."
View the Give Us Liberty post at:
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.co...-his-2008.html
View the complete original article at:
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/pub...-down-over-50/
Give Us Liberty
James V. Lacey @ California Political Review, 1/11/2012
1/12/2012
Excerpts:
"As Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton went into the Democratic National Convention in 2008 against Barack Hussein Obama,she had received a majority of the popular vote against Obama,18,045,829 votes to 17,869,419. Still, Obama and his Chicago machine managers fairly easily wrestled away the nomination for president from her. Yet what is now more amazing,is that in the Iowa and New Hampshire primary elections this Presidential election,Obama is doing far worse in popular vote than during 2008.
True,Obama doesn’t have Hillary Clinton to run against in 2012, but isn’t it strange that not only are none of the vote totals Hillary racked-up transferring over to Obama,but even Obama voters themselves have diminished? Obama voters and other traditional Democratic voters in the early primaries seen to be scurrying away from him like “rats on a sinking ship.”
Here are some popular vote totals and comparisons:in 2008 Obama received 104,404 votes in New Hampshire,finishing second to Hillary Clinton,who had 112,404 votes. But on Tuesday in New Hampshire,Obama,with 81.54% of the vote in the Democratic primary, received only 47,220 total votes. That is less than 50% of his 2008 vote total in the Granite State,not including all the missing Hillary voters.............…
The fact is, Ron Paul even got more votes in New Hampshire this week, at 56,223,than Obama at 47,220, and Romney creamed them both with 96,773…."
View the Give Us Liberty post at:
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.co...-his-2008.html
View the complete original article at:
http://www.capoliticalreview.com/pub...-down-over-50/