Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Obama cuts deal with Iran over nukes -- WND, Reza Kahlili

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Obama cuts deal with Iran over nukes -- WND, Reza Kahlili

    Obama cuts deal with Iran over nukes

    Sanctions to vanish in exchange for 'temporary' halt in enrichment work

    WND

    Reza Kahlili
    10/19/2012

    Excerpt:

    Editor’s note: Tonight the New York Times is reporting the Obama administration is opening direct talks with Iran in uranium enrichment issues. WND’s earlier reports, including this one, provide the depth and context for this announcement.

    Iranian and U.S. negotiators have reached an agreement that calls for Iran to halt part of its nuclear program in exchange for the lifting of many of the U.S. sanctions against the Islamic regime, according to a highly placed source.

    Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, expects a letter from President Obama in a few days guaranteeing the details of the agreement, arrived at recently during secret negotiations in Doha, Qatar.

    The source, who remains anonymous for security reasons and is highly placed in Iran’s regime, said that once Khamenei receives Obama’s guarantees, he will authorize an announcement by Iran on a solution to the nuclear crisis before the U.S. presidential elections.

    The agreement calls for Iran to announce a temporary halt to partial uranium enrichment after which the U.S. will remove many of its sanctions, including those on the Iranian central bank, no later than by the Iranian New Year in March. Iran is in the throes of massive inflation and citizen unrest because of the sanctions.

    French intelligence verified today that Yukiya Amano, the current director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, has been given the go-ahead by the U.S. to be ready to travel to Iran and announce the agreement, according to Hamid Reza Zakeri, a former intelligence officer in the regime who has defected to Europe.

    The source in Tehran said Khamenei has made it clear that unless he receives Obama’s written guarantees, he will not begin the process, which would dramatically boost Obama’s re-election chances. If the guarantees are not given, Khamenei has warned, Iran will speed up its nuclear program.

    The guarantees would ensure the regime’s right to peaceful enrichment, quickly remove many of the sanctions, accept that Iran’s nuclear program does not have a military dimension and relieve international pressure on the regime while it continues its nuclear program. Also, the U.S. would announce that the killing of Iranian nuclear scientists was the work of a foreign country, though Israel would not be named, to increase legal pressure on Israel.

    According to the Iranian source, a previous Obama letter to Khamenei indicated that it’s best for the regime not to give any motive to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, a message that was re-emphasized in the Qatar negotiations.

    As reported exclusively by WND Oct. 4, a three-person delegation led by a woman on behalf of the Obama administration traveled to Qatar about Oct. 1 and met with Iranian counterparts, including Ali Akbar Velayati, the former foreign minister of the Islamic regime and a close adviser to Khamenei on international matters.

    In the meeting, according to the source, the U.S. delegation urged an announcement, even if only on a temporary nuclear deal, before the U.S. elections to help Obama get re-elected. A Romney presidency, the delegation said, would surely move more toward Israel, and the Iranians were reminded that Obama has stood up to Israel against any plans to attack Iran. The regime’s delegate was urged to understand that if Iran does not stand by Obama, Israel will attack Iran.

    Days after the WND report, Ali Akbar Salehi, the regime’s foreign minister, in an interview with the German magazine Der Spiegel, stated, “If our right to enrichment is guaranteed, we are prepared to offer an exchange.”

    The same message was relayed by several other officials of the regime.

    U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said recently in Kazakhstan that the sanctions can be lifted immediately if Tehran worked with world powers to address questions about its nuclear program.

    In the Qatar meeting, according to the Iranian source, the American woman delegate, who has had several meetings with Velayati during the past several years, jokingly told Velayati that she will be the next secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Development in a second Obama administration and that it would be wise for Iranians to invest in U.S. real estate.

    In the past five months, four meetings were held in the U.S. with the Islamic regime’s surrogates to hash out what was to be discussed at the Doha meeting. The source identified Valerie Jarrett, a senior Obama adviser, as the head of the U.S. effort to engage Iran. Also identified was Cyrus Amir Mokri, assistant secretary of the Treasury Department for financial institutions, as another member advising the president on the issue.

    Jarrett’s family has known the Velayati family since their stay in Iran in the 1950s, the source added. Jarrett’s father worked at the Namazi hospital in Shiraz, owned by an Iranian family that has been influential with the regime after the Islamic Revolution.

    WND contacted both the U.S. State Department and the White House, asking about the Doha negotiations, who led the delegation from the U.S., whether Obama will provide the written guarantee, what negotiations the U.S. has pursued on its own and what is known about Amano’s plan to travel to Iran for the announcement.

    The State Department declined to respond to multiple calls as well as email inquiries. A spokeswoman said the White House would not comment.

    ..............................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-cut...an-over-nukes/
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Typical stinking double dealing political ploy . Pray the AMERICAN people are not impressed .

    Comment


    • #3
      White House denies any deal to hold nuke talks with Iran

      The Washington Times
      Paige Winfield Cunningham and Dave Boyer
      10/20/2012

      Excerpt:

      The White House denied a report that it set up direct talks with Iran about its nuclear program, but that didn’t halt a flurry of speculation Sunday.

      Democrats said the talks, if they are happening, prove that sanctions supported by President Obama have worked; Republicans accused the Iranians of using the U.S. election to buy time for their nuclear weapons development.

      Iran has agreed to directly negotiate with the U.S., but with the caveat that talks not take place until after the Nov. 6 presidential election, according to a weekend report by The New York Times. While Iranian officials cited uncertainty about the election as a reason for delaying talks, Sen. Lindsey Graham said that’s just a “ploy” allowing them to use the election cycle “in a pretty clever way.”

      “I think the Iranians are trying to take advantage of our election cycle to continue to talk,” the South Carolina Republican told Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday.” “I think the time for talking is over, we should be demanding transparency and access to their nuclear program.”

      With the presidential election just 15 days away, there’s little the White House does that isn’t being viewed through a political lens — and that’s especially true when it comes to foreign policy, with GOP candidate Mitt Romney and other Republicans criticizing how Mr. Obama has handled touchy situations in countries like Iran, Libya and Afghanistan.

      And as Iran took the spotlight over the weekend, both campaigns were in a heightened state of sensitivity over foreign policy issues, with both candidates preparing to debate that topic in their third and final debate on Monday night.

      The White House moved quickly Saturday to knock down the story.

      “It’s not true that the United States and Iran have agreed to one-on-one talks or any meeting after the American elections,” National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor said in a statement, adding that the U.S. has said “from the outset that we would be prepared to meet bilaterally.”

      “The president has made clear that he will prevent Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, and we will do what we must to achieve that,” Mr. Vietor said. “It has always been our goal for sanctions to pressure Iran to come in line with its obligations. The onus is on the Iranians to do so, otherwise they will continue to face crippling sanctions and increased pressure.”

      Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, a former White House chief of staff, on ABC’s “This Week” credited Mr. Obama’s sanctions-based approach for putting Iran’s economy “on its knees.”

      And Richard J. Durbin, the second-highest-ranking Democrat in the Senate, pointed to the plummeting value of Iran’s currency, the rial, which lost nearly 40 percent of its value against the U.S. dollar in early October. It has since regained some of its value, but Mr. Durbin said the fluctuation is evidence that Iran is feeling strong pressure to suspend its weapons program.

      “This is a clear indication that the sanctions regime President Obama has put together with Israel and other countries is putting pressure on Iran to sit down and finally acknowledge they cannot have a nuclear weapon,” he said on “Fox News Sunday.”

      Even as they denied agreeing to direct negotiations — contrary to The New York Times report — White House officials still expressed willingness to sit down with Iran if that will stem its pursuit of nuclear weapons. But Sen. Rob Portman, Ohio Republican, said doing so could “jettison” allies of the U.S. who pushed harder for sanctions originally.

      “The last thing we would want to do is abandon our allies in this and make it a one-on-one negotiation,” he said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “Some of our allies have been more forward-leaning than we have been in putting sanctions in place.”

      .................................................. .......

      View the complete article, including video, at:

      http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...ld-talks-iran/
      B. Steadman

      Comment

      Working...
      X