Was it Stolen?
Dave in Fla's Poll Analysis
Dave
11/8/2012
I hate going down a birther road, but yes I believe the election was stolen, and the implications of that are very bad.
First of all, Obama received 10 million less votes than he did in 2008. The part that is unbelievable is that Romney received 3 million less votes than McCain. At the end of the day, Obama won in the 4 critical swing states by 500,000 votes.
But is is worse than that. We can look at who voted. By examining the number of Independents and their preference shift among actual voters, we know that 5 million Independents changed their votes from Obama to Romney. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where McCain was in 2008.
This means that 5.5 million Republican voters are not accounted for.
They didn't show up at the polls, or their votes were not counted. We know now that no subgroup of the coalition decided to sit out. So the current attempts to blame the SoCons are stupid. All of our groups showed up to vote at the rates they did in 2008. For this to be true over 10% of Republicans needed to decide not to vote this year, who did vote in 2008.
Does that make any sense?
In fact, it is even worse, we know for a fact that heavy GOP counties were swamped all day. We watched all day as Pasco County Florida was showing huge increases in GOP voters over the 2008 numbers.
In Virgina, with 69% of the precincts in, Romney held a 6% lead. Yet once a small number of counties reported, that lead disappeared.
If the vote drop off occurred, it occurred in a very small number of counties. It was not visible nationwide.
I contend that you can not get a 10% drop off in GOP turnout without it being noticeable during the GOTV effort, measures of enthusiasm in polling, or visibly lower turnout in GOP leaning precincts.
I know you don't want to believe such a thing is possible. You don't want to think that the Obama campaign would engage in such blatant election fraud. But these are the same people who ran Fast and Furious without regard for the cost in human lives, turned off their credit card verification system to allow fraudulent donations, and allowed CIA operative in Libya to die because it was politically inconvenient. Do you really think that massive election fraud is something they wouldn't do?
If this is true, then we have some hard things to consider.
First of all, we are now needlessly fracturing our coalition pointing fingers at people for not voting. Second, we are making an assumption about the make up of the American public that is not true. We are going to modify our party and message to appeal to a group of individuals who do not represent the majority of the population.
Most difficult to believe is that we are living in Venezuela where our elections are merely for show, and the people in charge of the Governments decide who will win elections. We become wards of the State, which is the aim of those who stole this election.
So how can this be proved?
I am going to start by looking at a few key counties in Florida. What I want to see is the voter registration numbers by party, and then compare them to the actual votes received. Theoretically, if this were to be done for all counties in Florida, we could see where the fraud occurred. Comparing the votes Romney received to the strike lists would show that in specific counties Romney received something like 50% of the Republican vote (picking a number out of the air) while we know that nationwide he received 95% of the Republican vote. To really get to the answer, we would need to get the registration books, which might be possible through Freedom of Information act. Those show who actually voted, by name, and their party.
The media will not pursue this. This will take citizen journalists working in every state.
View the complete post at:
http://difpolls.blogspot.com/2012/11...n-birther.html
Dave in Fla's Poll Analysis
Dave
11/8/2012
I hate going down a birther road, but yes I believe the election was stolen, and the implications of that are very bad.
First of all, Obama received 10 million less votes than he did in 2008. The part that is unbelievable is that Romney received 3 million less votes than McCain. At the end of the day, Obama won in the 4 critical swing states by 500,000 votes.
But is is worse than that. We can look at who voted. By examining the number of Independents and their preference shift among actual voters, we know that 5 million Independents changed their votes from Obama to Romney. So Romney started the day 2.5 million votes ahead of where McCain was in 2008.
This means that 5.5 million Republican voters are not accounted for.
They didn't show up at the polls, or their votes were not counted. We know now that no subgroup of the coalition decided to sit out. So the current attempts to blame the SoCons are stupid. All of our groups showed up to vote at the rates they did in 2008. For this to be true over 10% of Republicans needed to decide not to vote this year, who did vote in 2008.
Does that make any sense?
In fact, it is even worse, we know for a fact that heavy GOP counties were swamped all day. We watched all day as Pasco County Florida was showing huge increases in GOP voters over the 2008 numbers.
In Virgina, with 69% of the precincts in, Romney held a 6% lead. Yet once a small number of counties reported, that lead disappeared.
If the vote drop off occurred, it occurred in a very small number of counties. It was not visible nationwide.
I contend that you can not get a 10% drop off in GOP turnout without it being noticeable during the GOTV effort, measures of enthusiasm in polling, or visibly lower turnout in GOP leaning precincts.
I know you don't want to believe such a thing is possible. You don't want to think that the Obama campaign would engage in such blatant election fraud. But these are the same people who ran Fast and Furious without regard for the cost in human lives, turned off their credit card verification system to allow fraudulent donations, and allowed CIA operative in Libya to die because it was politically inconvenient. Do you really think that massive election fraud is something they wouldn't do?
If this is true, then we have some hard things to consider.
First of all, we are now needlessly fracturing our coalition pointing fingers at people for not voting. Second, we are making an assumption about the make up of the American public that is not true. We are going to modify our party and message to appeal to a group of individuals who do not represent the majority of the population.
Most difficult to believe is that we are living in Venezuela where our elections are merely for show, and the people in charge of the Governments decide who will win elections. We become wards of the State, which is the aim of those who stole this election.
So how can this be proved?
I am going to start by looking at a few key counties in Florida. What I want to see is the voter registration numbers by party, and then compare them to the actual votes received. Theoretically, if this were to be done for all counties in Florida, we could see where the fraud occurred. Comparing the votes Romney received to the strike lists would show that in specific counties Romney received something like 50% of the Republican vote (picking a number out of the air) while we know that nationwide he received 95% of the Republican vote. To really get to the answer, we would need to get the registration books, which might be possible through Freedom of Information act. Those show who actually voted, by name, and their party.
The media will not pursue this. This will take citizen journalists working in every state.
View the complete post at:
http://difpolls.blogspot.com/2012/11...n-birther.html
Comment