Tweet
Court Rules Foreign-Born Hassan Not Natural Born Citizen: 14th Did Not Repeal Article II
Birther Report
3/12/2013
Excerpt:
Appeals Court Rules Foreign-Born Hassan Not Natural Born Citizen: 14th Amendment Did Not Repeal Article II
FROM THE ORDER:
To the extent appellant maintains that Article II, Section I, clause 5 of the United States Constitution has been implicitly repealed to the extent it bars naturalized citizens such as himself from holding the office of President, appellant failed to state a claim for relief. Appellant cites no authority to support his contention that a constitutional provision can be implicitly repealed, nor has he shown the natural-born citizen requirement is in irreconcilable conflict with the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, or that those amendments “cover[ ] the whole subject” of the requirement and are “clearly intended as a substitute.” Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254, 273 (2003).
CITIZEN WELLS ASKS THE OBVIOUS:
Abdul Karim Hassan vs Federal Election Commission, March 11, 2013, U S Court of Appeals Per Curiam Order, Hassan not Natural Born Citizen
“Moreover, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the distinction between natural born citizens and naturalized citizens in the context of Presidential eligibility remains valid.”…Hassan vs FEC
“Because the natural born citizen requirement has not been explicitly or implicitly repealed, Hassan’s challenge to that provision, and the Fund Act’s incorporation thereof, must fail.”…Hassan vs FEC
“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense, to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells -
FULL ORDER BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/130019941
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...n-citizen.html
Birther Report
3/12/2013
Excerpt:
Appeals Court Rules Foreign-Born Hassan Not Natural Born Citizen: 14th Amendment Did Not Repeal Article II
FROM THE ORDER:
To the extent appellant maintains that Article II, Section I, clause 5 of the United States Constitution has been implicitly repealed to the extent it bars naturalized citizens such as himself from holding the office of President, appellant failed to state a claim for relief. Appellant cites no authority to support his contention that a constitutional provision can be implicitly repealed, nor has he shown the natural-born citizen requirement is in irreconcilable conflict with the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, or that those amendments “cover[ ] the whole subject” of the requirement and are “clearly intended as a substitute.” Branch v. Smith, 538 U.S. 254, 273 (2003).
CITIZEN WELLS ASKS THE OBVIOUS:
Abdul Karim Hassan vs Federal Election Commission, March 11, 2013, U S Court of Appeals Per Curiam Order, Hassan not Natural Born Citizen
“Moreover, the Supreme Court has consistently held that the distinction between natural born citizens and naturalized citizens in the context of Presidential eligibility remains valid.”…Hassan vs FEC
“Because the natural born citizen requirement has not been explicitly or implicitly repealed, Hassan’s challenge to that provision, and the Fund Act’s incorporation thereof, must fail.”…Hassan vs FEC
“Why has Obama, since taking the White House, used Justice Department Attorneys, at taxpayer expense, to avoid presenting a legitimate birth certificate and college records?”…Citizen Wells -
FULL ORDER BELOW OR HERE: http://www.scribd.com/doc/130019941
View the complete Birther Report presentation at:
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogs...n-citizen.html