Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Syria: The Next Libya? -- FrontPage Magazine, Matthew Vadum

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Syria: The Next Libya? -- FrontPage Magazine, Matthew Vadum

    Syria: The Next Libya?

    FrontPage Magazine

    Matthew Vadum
    6/14/2013

    Excerpt:

    The Obama administration has finally officially acknowledged that the Syrian government has used illegal chemical weapons in its bloody civil war half a year after reports first surfaced, which opens the door to U.S. involvement in the conflict.

    After months of heel-dragging, the administration admits Syria crossed the much-vaunted “red line” President Obama laid down for U.S. action in that regime’s two year war against opposition forces. Obama said last summer that if Syria used chemical weapons such an action would be a “game-changer” for the United States. Despite reports that the Assad regime has done precisely that, Obama has been taking his sweet time making an official finding.

    But yesterday Ben Rhodes, a young White House speechwriter who works as the White House’s deputy national security adviser for strategic communications, said “the president has made his decision.”

    Rhodes, for what it’s worth, may be responsible for concocting the official lies about last September’s deadly terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya.

    Rhodes said U.S. intelligence reports indicate Hezbollah-backed Syria has used sarin and various chemical weapons “on a small scale” against multiple rebel targets on at least four occasions over the past year. The death toll from such attacks could be 150 or higher, he said. The United Nations says 92,000 have died in the civil war so far.

    “Suffice it to say that decision has been made about providing additional direct support to the [opposition Supreme Military Council] to strengthen their effectiveness,” Rhodes said. “This is more a situation where we’re just not going to be able to lay out an inventory of what exactly falls under the scope of that assistance other than to communicate that we have made that decision.”

    Sending Americans troops to wade into the Middle Eastern conflict is off the table right now but administration officials say the U.S. will soon augment the “scope and scale” of its military aid to the largely jihadist opponents of Syria’s brutal president Bashar Assad.

    The Obama administration says it hasn’t decided if the U.S. will support a proposed “no-fly” zone over Syria. Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) are both pressing for a no-fly zone.

    It is suspected that the Syrian opposition will not last much longer absent external assistance. Earlier this month, in Syria the town of Qusair was taken by forces loyal to the Assad regime. Qusair is strategically important because it links the capital city of Damascus to the Mediterranean Sea on which ports and a Russian naval base are located.

    As Charles Krauthammer noted, the capture of Qusair with the assistance of the pro-Iranian terrorist group Hezbollah frees up Assad’s resources, allowing him to “advance on rebel-dominated areas in central and northern Syria, including Aleppo.”

    “For the rebels, it’s a devastating loss of territory, morale and their supply corridor to Lebanon,” Krauthammer writes. “No one knows if this reversal of fortune will be the last, but everyone knows that Assad now has the upper hand.”

    Obama’s decision comes a month after Secretary of State John Kerry surreptitiously gave Egypt $1.3 billion in U.S. military aid, rewarding that country’s Islamofascist dictatorship for its increasingly vicious assaults on foreign workers, religious minorities, and civil society.

    ..............................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://frontpagemag.com/2013/matthew...he-next-libya/
    B. Steadman

  • #2
    Could Syria ignite World War 3? That's the terrifying question as the hatred between two Muslim ideologies sucks in the world's superpowers

    • Syrian conflict could engulf region in struggle between Sunni and Shia
    • Already claimed 93,000 lives and made 1.6million people refugees
    • UK, France and U.S. taken different side to China and Russia


    The Daily Mail

    Michael Burleigh
    6/13/2013

    Excerpt:

    The crisis in Syria may appear to be no more or less than a civil war in a country many people would struggle to place on a map.

    But it’s much more than that: it is rapidly becoming a sectarian struggle for power that is bleeding across the Middle East, with the potential to engulf the entire region in a deadly power struggle between two bitterly opposed Muslim ideologies, Sunni and Shia.

    Already, the war inside Syria has resulted in 93,000 dead and 1.6 million refugees, with millions more displaced internally. And those figures are escalating rapidly amid reports of appalling atrocities on both sides.

    The conflict started in 2011 with peaceful protests against the authoritarian regime of Bashar al-Assad, the seemingly mild successor to his father Hafez, who between 1970 and 2000 ruled Syria with a rod of iron.

    Hafez’s response to dissent from the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood was to wipe out a town of 20,000 people.

    Fearing that Syria faced the kind of protests that had toppled the rulers of Tunisia, Egypt and Libya during the ‘Arab Spring’, Bashar al-Assad’s security forces used tanks and gunfire to crush the demonstrations. But it only stoked the fires.

    The opposition developed into an armed insurgency, and now Syria has been engulfed in a civil war which has degenerated into a vicious sectarian conflict.

    On one side are those who follow President Assad, who belongs to the Alawites — a splinter sect from Shia Islam.

    On the other are a loose affiliation of insurgents drawn from the majority Sunni population, some of whom have close links to the Sunni jihadists of Al Qaeda.

    The level of savagery is appalling. This week, up to 60 Shia Muslims were reported to have been slaughtered in an attack by opposition fighters in the eastern Syrian city of Hatla.

    A gloating cameraman who filmed the aftermath said: ‘This is the Shia carcass, this is their end.’

    Sadly, it is an all too familiar story in a religious conflict that dates back to the 7th century.

    After the death of the Prophet Mohammed in 632AD, there were four candidates vying to succeed him.

    One group, which would become the Shia (or Shi’ite) sect, favoured the claims of the Prophet’s grandson Ali, but he was passed over three times before eventually taking on the mantle, only to then be assassinated.

    An irrevocable split between the Shia — which is run by a clerical hierarchy — and the group that became the Sunnis came after a battle in 680, when Ali’s grandson was killed.

    Today, in Syria and across the Middle East, the divide is a gulf in which theology plays an important role.

    The main pillars of the current Assad regime are the army, the intelligence services and the Ba’athists, the local version of the national party Saddam Hussein led in Iraq.

    Assad’s backbone is stiffened by the influence of his mother and uncles, who want to crush the Syrian rebels.

    Many wealthy businessmen in the capital Damascus also support the Assads, as do Christians who fear the rapid establishment of an Islamist state if he falls.

    ................................................

    View the complete article at:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...=feeds-newsxml
    B. Steadman

    Comment


    • #3
      (1) Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Could Syria ignite World War 3? two Muslim ideologies suck in the world's superpowers', which was started 6/14/2013 by 'Tennessee Nana'

      The thread references a 6/13/2013 Daily Mail article written by Michael Burleigh - http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...perpowers.html

      View the complete Free Republic thread at:

      http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3031138/posts

      Excerpt:

      The crisis in Syria ...a deadly power struggle between two bitterly opposed Muslim ideologies, Sunni and Shia.

      Already, the war inside Syria has resulted in 93,000 dead and 1.6 million refugees, with millions more displaced internally

      SNIP

      On one side are those who follow President Assad, who belongs to the Alawites — a splinter sect from Shia Islam.

      On the other are ...insurgents drawn from the majority Sunni population, some of whom have close links to the Sunni jihadists of Al Qaeda.

      SNIP

      The main pillars of the current Assad regime are the army, the intelligence services and the Ba’athists, the local version of the national party Saddam Hussein led in Iraq.

      Many wealthy businessmen in the capital Damascus also support the Assads, as do Christians who fear the rapid establishment of an Islamist state if he falls.

      SNIP

      Christians make up 10 per cent of the Syrian population, while another 10 per cent are Kurds, who are Sunnis and present in much larger numbers in Turkey, Iran and Iraq, too.

      SNIP

      Assad is supported by Iran (the main Shia power in the Middle East) and its militant Lebanese ally, the terrorist group Hezbollah.

      The latter is Iran’s main weapon in any fight with Israel.

      As a result, Assad is advised (and protected) by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, and there are also between 5,000 and 8,000 seasoned Hezbollah fighters inside Syria.

      SNIP

      The rebels have also benefited from the ferocious will-to-die of an Islamist group called Jabhat al-Nusra, which is allied with Al Qaeda in Iraq.

      Many more rebels are Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood persuasion.

      They are supported with guns and money from Sunni states such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia.

      SNIP

      What happens in Syria affects Israel, .. And what affects Israel also involves the U.S., its staunch ally.




      To: Tennessee Nana

      Most wars are started by arrogance, stupidity and incompetence, qualities our Dear Leader has in World Class abundance, so starting a World War is well within his capabilities.

      4 posted on Friday, June 14, 2013 1:48:31 AM by rdcbn




      To: Tennessee Nana

      We have no business taking either side. They are both rotten. This is yet another conflict Obama is dragging us into to drag the country down.

      38 posted on Friday, June 14, 2013 4:13:32 AM by Nepeta




      To: munin

      Or more likely in my mind it is the other way around, in the last few years, the CIA has become under new management, and the new boss -not like the old boss

      As I've said many times, CIA, as well as its predecessor OSS, is a creation of the financial oligarchy. It's top level management are recommended by Presidential advisors who are are always intimately tied in with the financial oligarchy. The names are not drawn out of a hat.

      The new boss is exactly like the old boss, and all the Presidents since before Wilson, who have all been anywhere from financial oligarchy stooges to those simply heavily influenced by the oligarchy and surrounded by it's minions as advisors. Plans to put the current occupant on a possible path to residence would have started when he was introduced into the Pritzker local fiefdom of the oligarchy by Valerie Jarrett. The Pritzker fiefdom has the fingerprints of a number of oligarchy-type relationships: offshore banking (Castle Bank for one), Meyer Lansky, CIA, Harvard Law, TransUnion credit reporting agency (globalism key strategy is consumer reliance on debt). Interestingly, TransUnion has a few folks in management that also have HSBC (original opium trade bank) and Booz Allen on their resume.

      The President of the US does not speak to anyone at CIA except the top-level management. So he would only be aware of what they told him, which gives CIA, in effect, complete latitude to do as they want to on behalf of the financial oligarchy, without the President having the need to know. This gives the President not only plausible deniability but it actually frees his conscience up from worrying about CIA escapades because he really only knows what they tell him ("want to know").

      CIA has long associations with outside groups like the Ford Foundation, and many others, that are all key elements of the financial oligarchy. These relationships were essential, for example, in delivering NIE's (national intelligence estimates, the President's CIA briefing) which reported that a worldwide AIDS epidemic was a national security threat to the United States. This idea was researched and discussed at length in think tanks and foundations, but they could not directly plop their writings on the President's desk in the Oval Office, since those foundations and think tanks ARE NOT part of the US government. But with all the meetings, yackity-yack and intellectual overlap between "experts" and the CIA, the CIA was able to "become aware" of the problem and slap together an unclassfied NIE for President Clinton at the end of his reign. This document, being an NIE, officially "created the crisis", providing justification for Bush II to sign Executive Orders to "counter the threat".

      It's ludicrous to think that Al-Qada is telling CIA what to do when CIA is doing the bidding of most of the financial oligarchy that indirectly controls most of the world's wealth (via Boards of Directors being selected from amongst like-minded people trained under the oligarchs' university system), when Al-Qada gang members are paid three hots and a cot and some walkin' around money by their paymaster to rape and pillage populations into accepting the Bank of International Settlements banking regime.

      Muslim Brotherhood is the creation of MI6, the sister organization to CIA. The US/UK financial oligarchy has for a century had the strategy of creating chaos in the middle east, frequent upheaval, constant struggle, puppet regimes, etc., to facilitate their business dealings. Interestingly, I've found some hypotheses that when Valerie Jarret was growing up in Iran, her father was a CIA asset used to help ferret out Mosaddegh loyalists. While it was very dismissively denied, it certainly would explain a lot.

      Western NGOs, notably Soros's network (CIA affiliated, globalist-backed when necessary, such as for induced financial panics), have partnered with CIA/State on revolutions for decades in Eastern Europe and now the Middle East. Soros job openings in the middle east over the past few years, USAID efforts over that time, etc., have shown the organizational efforts have been underway for years.

      Al-Qada terror network is called in when rebellion fighting gets too intense for paid demonstrators. News coverage is coordinated by globalism (boards of directors ensure this), which includes Al-Jazeera, apparently well-known in the middle east to be a Western front operation.

      39 posted on Friday, June 14, 2013 4:25:07 AM by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
      Last edited by bsteadman; 06-14-2013, 03:30 PM.
      B. Steadman

      Comment


      • #4
        White House says Syria used chemical weapons, crossing Obama's red line

        The Hill

        Julian Pecquet
        6/13/2013

        Excerpt: - 06/13/13 09:36 PM ET

        The White House said Thursday it would send military assistance to the Syrian opposition after concluding that Bashar Assad has crossed President Obama's so-called red line on chemical weapons.

        Deputy National Security Advisor for Strategic Communications Ben Rhodes told reporters the president has ruled out putting U.S. boots on the ground however and remains unconvinced that a no-fly zone to protect rebel-held areas is workable.

        Rhodes did not make it clear what types of military assistance would be provided and did not use the word "weapons" when asked directly whether arms would be delivered to rebel groups.

        “The president has made a decision providing more support for the opposition,” Rhodes said. He added that this would involve providing direct support to the Syrian opposition.

        "I cannot detail for you all the types of that support for a variety of reasons, but again suffice to say, this is going to be different in both scope and scale in terms of what we are providing to the [opposition] than what we were providing before.”

        Rhodes did not announce a no-fly zone over Syria, but said it had not been ruled out.

        “We have not made any decisions to pursue a military operation such as a no fly zone,” he said.

        U.S. officials told The Wall Street Journal late Thursday that a plan to arm rebels also calls for a limited no-fly zone that would stretch up to 25 miles into Syria and be enforced from Jordan.

        ................................................

        View the complete article at:

        http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affa...emical-weapons
        B. Steadman

        Comment


        • #5
          (2) Continued - Free Republic thread:

          To: Olog-hai

          The CIA having the goal of establishing an Islamic caliphate would be highly unlikely; therefore, since the goals of al-Qa’eda are being advanced,

          Hah, (lol) I used to think caliphate. No, when you look at the history of UK/US business/CIA/military in the mideast, you realize those little Kings are vassals. It's literally and figuratively a sandbox for the CIA to play in and do the bidding of the financial oligarchy.

          Revolution after revolution after revolution, expressly for the purpose of keeping the area under autocratic rule, getting used to free stuff, becoming dependent on the state, etc. Keep them fighting each other. Keep selling them military equipment, hotels, airports, office towers, investments in the West, Treasury bonds, Bechtel services, bridges, dams, Caterpillar tractors, Toyota pickups, MANPADs, etc., etc., etc.

          If we only keep sending them dollars and they never invest them or spend them, we have a trade imbalance problem like the British did buying things with silver in China (they substituted opium for silver to fix their problem).

          The oligarchy gets them to invest in Western markets and Western sovereign debt, as well as spend on Western goods and services. The oligarchy minions in USAID funnel tax dollars over there to buy stuff from oligarchy corps. This encourages them to "arm up" with a lot of military hardware from oligarchy defense businesses and build large standing armies that can be "set off" with the right espionage and diplomatic effort.

          The oligarchy plans and implements all wars for the past century, and they do not want the USA, their own HQ and all their nice estates, to be trashed, unless they will make an enormous amount of money from it, or be able to bring the US under a global or regional government, and I don't think the US is ready for that.

          The Saudis were put in place by Standard Oil and have been American vassals ever since. The Muslim Brotherhood was the creation of MI6. They're the ones mostly talking about caliphate, so I know this is just talk to motivate the young guys being recruited for service in jihad groups. It's all bluster with absolutely zero capability to militarily do anything to the US. The jihadis are just used to strike fear into Western populations by doing attacks now and then. This is then used to tighten up on gun owership in the US and make the police state seem "safe" and acceptable in Western nations, as well as justify setting up domesting spying operations against those who defy globalism's various agendas.

          Muslims have been encouraged to migrate to the US, but this is simply to provide domestic chaos, which perpetually justifies the police state.

          41 posted on Friday, June 14, 2013 5:45:28 AM by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
          B. Steadman

          Comment


          • #6
            Jordan wargames: Patriot batteries, F-16s and 4,500 US troops near Syrian border

            RT

            6/10/2013

            Excerpt:

            Multinational military exercise 'Eager Lion' has been launched in Jordan amid condemnation from neighboring Syria and its ally Russia. The US brings Patriot missile batteries to the Syrian border, which could remain deployed afterwards.

            The exercises will last for 12 days, bringing together about 8,000 personnel from 19 countries, mostly Arabic, but also including the US and Europe. The maneuvers will also involve some 3,000 Jordanian and 500 British troops.

            'Eager Lion' – which is being conducted only 120km from the Jordan-Syria border – is aimed at training personnel for the possibility of the Syrian civil war spilling into neighboring countries.

            Russia has raised concerns over the deployment of US Patriot missile batteries and F-16 fighter jets to Jordan: “We have more than once stated our opinion on this – foreign weapons are being pumped into an explosive region,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Aleksandr Lukashevich said last week.

            “This is happening very close to Syria, where for more than two years the flames of a devastating conflict are burning that Russia and its American partners are trying to stop by proposing to hold an international peace conference as soon as possible,” Lukashevich said.

            The organizers of 'Eager Lion' say that the troops involved will also train for the possibility of a chemical attack, as Syria’s neighbors fear that Damascus may lose control of its chemical weapons arsenal, which could then fall into the wrong hands.

            "We all have chemical training from any activity, so we continue to build those objectives into any exercise that we do,” said US Major General Robert Catalanotti, the Director of Exercises and Training.

            Last week the US military revealed it may indefinitely leave behind the Patriot batteries and F-16s deployed in Jordan due to the threat of the violence in Syria crossing into Jordanian territory.

            Jordanian Army Major General Awni el-Edwan, Operation Chief of Staff, told reporters on Sunday that no US troops, Patriot missile complexes or F-16s would remain in Jordan after the exercises conclude: "The drills have nothing to do with any objective related to what is happening in Syria."

            “No forces will stay after the exercise unless there is a request by the Jordanian government to keep the Patriots and F-16 jets, this is a political decision," General el-Edwan said, adding that Amman has no intention to “attack anybody.”

            US Major General Robert Catalanotti echoed el-Edwan's remarks, saying that “If the government of Jordan decides to make that request that would have go back through Washington, DC, for decision, and they would have to plan the numbers to support that.”

            “But as of right now, in the exercise, I am not working that issue at all, I'm simply using those instruments here for our objectives in the exercise,” Catalanotti said.

            .................................................

            View the complete article at:

            http://rt.com/news/jordan-multinatio...exercises-459/
            B. Steadman

            Comment


            • #7
              Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'US troops on Syria border as Obama arms rebels', which was started 6/14/2013 by 'mykroar'

              The thread references a 6/14/2013 article in the Times Middle East - http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/w...cle3791863.ece

              View the complete Free Republic thread at:

              http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3031468/posts

              Excerpt:

              Three hundred US Marines have been deployed to northern Jordan to pave the way for the West to arm Syrian rebels.

              A Patriot anti-aircraft missile system, designed to protect Jordanian territory from attack by Assad missiles, has also been moved into the area.
              B. Steadman

              Comment

              Working...
              X