ITB - Leno: 'Very Dangerous to White House If Journalists Start Asking Real Questions

[bsteadman]

Leno: 'Very Dangerous to White House If Journalists Suddenly Start Asking Real Questions'

NewsBusters
Noel Sheppard
11/30/2012

Excerpt:

Jay Leno continued pressuring Barack Obama Thursday night.

During his opening monologue on NBC's Tonight Show, the host said, "This is very dangerous to the White House if journalists should suddenly start asking real questions” (video ...[embedded in article] with transcribed highlights and commentary):

“This week, CBS News became the first news organization besides Fox to ask President Obama ‘Who changed the Benghazi talking points?’” Leno teased.

“See, this is very dangerous to the White House if journalists should suddenly start asking real questions.”

Indeed it is, Jay. Indeed it is.

Just imagine how dangerous it would have been to Obama if so-called "journalists" would have asked him real questions in 2007 when he first threw his hat into the ring.

Or in 2008. Or 2009. Et cetera. Et cetera.

View the complete post, including video, at:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...#ixzz2Di8QB1t6

[bsteadman]

Free Republic is running a thread titled, 'Leno: 'Very Dangerous to White House If Journalists Suddenly Start Asking Real Questions', which was started 11/30/2012 by 'Kenny'

The thread references the 11/30/2012 NewsBusters article - http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sh...suddenly-start

View the complete Free Republic thread at:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2964442/posts


The following is an excerpt from COMMENT #27, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

... the Hawaii state registrar legally confirmed to AZ SOS Ken Bennett that Obama’s Hawaii birth certificate is not legally valid so Hawaii can’t verify any birth facts for Obama.


The following is an excerpt from COMMENT #37, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

... Bennett never even read the law that governed what Onaka said. How Bennett chooses to understand Onaka’s communication makes no difference to what Onaka actually verified. What matters is the law that Onaka was required to follow. It says that if he CAN verify a submitted fact he has to. And Onaka did not verify ANY of the things that Bennett submitted: that Barack Hussein Obama II, male, was born on Aug 4, 1961 in Honolulu, HI on the island of Oahu to Stanley Ann Dunham and Barack Hussein Obama.

Besides the actual birth facts submitted, Onaka would not verify that the image posted on the White House website is a “true and accurate representation of the original record on file”. Later, for KS SOS Kris Kobach, Onaka would not verify that the “information contained in” the White House image “matches the information contained” in the original record. By Hawaii law, that has to mean that it isn’t/doesn’t.

The fact that Bennett IGNORED what Onaka actually verified can be attributed to the power of the media, which also chose to ignore the law that governed what Onaka put on that piece of paper and reported that Onaka had verified the exact OPPOSITE of what Onaka legally verified. As long as the media was going to lie about it and make Bennett look like a fool if he followed the truth, Bennett was going to follow the media’s lie rather than the truth. Kobach did the same thing - aided by the mob that threatened the family of the man contesting Obama’s eligibility, who then withdrew his objection and provided the excuse for Kobach to let the mob trump the rule of law. All these guys (all state SOS’s) were informed of HI’s law and what Onaka actually verified, by attorney Larry Klayman, before they approved Obama’s name on the state ballot.

And that’s where this whole country sits, in a nutshell. We’ve already got it legally confirmed that Obama has no legally-determined birth facts saying he was born in Hawaii and thus cannot (without a legal procedure to determine his true birth facts) qualify by Jan 20th as required by the 20th Amendment - indeed, never did qualify on Jan 20, 2009 as required and so has been an unConstitutional acting POTUS for the past 4 years - but because the media will lie about it and our “leaders” are all afraid of the media, and our courts say it’s nobody else’s business, we are hanging here in a lawless state of limbo.

And that should scare the crap out of EVERYBODY.


The following is an excerpt from COMMENT #40, by 'butterdezillion' in the thread:

... Bennett never read the law before he claimed that what he received from Onaka was good enough for him. In fact, while he was still trying to get a response from HI he publicly stated that Obama would go on the ballot as long as Onaka sent ANYTHING back. And that’s exactly what happened. Onaka sent back legal confirmation that the HI BC is not legally valid and HI can thus not verify any birth facts for Obama.... and Obama’s name still went on the ballot.

Go figure.

After that, Attorney Larry Klayman informed Bennett and all the other state SOS’s that Onaka had confirmed a legally non-valid record. And every one of them allowed Obama on the ballot anyway. The counsel for Nebraska SOS John Gale said that anything from the DNC would get somebody on the ballot - even if the DNC people were sitting in jail for submitting a fraudulent, perjurious OCON - because the law doesn’t state that the OCON has to be LAWFUL (non-fraudulent and non-perjurious).

IOW, unless the word “lawful” is used in every place that a document is mentioned in the law, fakes are permissible.

I should purposely speed, get pulled over, and present an obviously-fake “driver’s license” under the name of Mickey Mouse. And then use the legal logic of this state lawyer to say that since the law doesn’t say it has to be a LAWFUL driver’s license (I’ll have to check out if that is the case, and if the law says that a driver has to have a LAWFUL driver’s license with them when they drive), they have to act as though I am really Mickey Mouse. Of course, when they try to press charges for failure to pay a fine, it will be Mickey Mouse who has to appear in court, and they’ll have a hard time finding Mickey Mouse at the address on that driver’s license...

Might be better just to ask the police what would happen. See if they use the same legal interpretations as that state lawyer uses - and if not, why not.